skip to main content
10.1145/3377817.3377827acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Factors That Influence the Audit Committee's Effectiveness In Malaysia Listed Companies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, the aims is to describe the effectiveness of audit committee, and also to identify the importance of audit committee required by Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (MCCG). The objective of the research reports is to examine the impact of three selected independent variables (audit committee's experience and expertise, role of audit committee, and size of audit committee) on the audit committee's effectiveness. Thorough the research, questionnaires were distributed to 50 listed companies in Bursa Malaysia. Along these lines, just 100 arrangements of polls are utilized for information investigation because of exceptions and incompletes of study. The information gathered from respondents were broke down by applying in the Pearson Correlation and Multiple Regression Analysis. The discoveries demonstrated that all the three autonomous factors have critical association with ward variable. This study showed a positive result for all three independent variables, so which is mean that the importance of audit committee's existence in relation to the credibility and transparency of financial statement. Nevertheless, further investigation and research on factors that may influence the audit committee's effectiveness should be conducted other than the audit committee's experience and expertise, role of audit committee and size of audit committee.

References

  1. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Morin, R. A., & Jarrell, S. L. (2000). Driving shareholder value: value-building techniques for creating shareholder wealth. McGraw Hill Professional.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Trotman, A. J., & Trotman, K. T. (2013). Internal audit's role in GHG emissions and energy reporting: Evidence from audit committees, senior accountants, and internal auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), 199--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Duska, R. F., Duska, B. S., & Kury, K. W. (2018). Accounting ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.Soh, D. S., & Martinov-Bennie, N. (2011). The internal audit function: Perceptions of internal audit roles, effectiveness and evaluation. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(7), 605--622.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brennan, N. M., & Kirwan, C. E. (2015). Audit committees: practices, practitioners and praxis of governance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(4), 466--493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Sharma, V. D., & Kuang, C. (2014). Voluntary Audit Committee Characteristics, Incentives, and Aggressive Earnings Management: Evidence from N ew Z ealand. International Journal of Auditing, 18(1), 76--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Thiruvadi, S., & Huang, H. W. (2011). Audit committee gender differences and earnings management. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 26(7), 483--498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Li, J., Mangena, M., & Pike, R. (2012). The effect of audit committee characteristics on intellectual capital disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 44(2), 98--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Agoglia, C. P., Doupnik, T. S., & Tsakumis, G. T. (2011). Principles-based versus rules-based accounting standards: The influence of standard precision and audit committee strength on financial reporting decisions. The Accounting Review, 86(3), 747--767.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Engel, E., Hayes, R. M., & Wang, X. (2010). Audit committee compensation and the demand for monitoring of the financial reporting process. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1-2), 136--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sharma, V. D., & Iselin, E. R. (2012). The association between audit committee multiple-directorships, tenure, and financial misstatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(3), 149--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Baccouche, S., Hadriche, M., & Omri, A. (2013). The impact of audit committee multiple-directorships on earnings management: evidence from France. Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(5), 1333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Othman, R., Ishak, I. F., Arif, S. M. M., & Aris, N. A. (2014). Influence of audit committee characteristics on voluntary ethics disclosure. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 330--342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hamdan, A. M., Sarea, A. M., & Reyad, S. M. R. (2013).The impact of audit committee characteristics on the performance: Evidence from Jordan. International Management Review, 9(1), 32--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheah, S. S., Kuan, T. C., Chew, S. C., Low, X. Y., & Poon, Z. H. (2016). Audit Committee Characteristics and Firm Performance of Public Listed Companies in Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, UTAR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Amar, A. B. (2014). The effect of independence audit committee on earnings management: The case in French. International Journal of Academic Research inGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 4(1), 96--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., McNamara, R., & Nagel, S. (2012). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting & Finance, 52(4), 971--1000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. DeZoort, F. T. (1998). An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members' oversight judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(1), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Hundal, S. (2013). Independence, Expertise and Experience of Audit Committees: Some Aspects of Indiation Corporate Sector. American International Journal of Social Science, 2(5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Badolato, P. G., Donelson, D. C., & Ege, M. (2014). Audit committee financial expertise and earnings management: The role of status. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 208--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Alzeban, A., & Sawan, N. (2015). The impact of audit committee characteristics on the implementation of internal audit recommendations. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 24, 61--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Saat, N. A. M., Karbhari, Y., Xiao, J. Z., & Heravi, S. (2012). Factors affecting independent audit committee members' effectiveness-The case of listed firms on Bursa Malaysia. World Review of Business Research, 2(3), 132--147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Abdullah, S. N., Ismail, K., & Izah, K. N. (1999). Audit commitee effectiveness among Malaysian listed companies. Malaysian Management Journal, 3(2), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Factors That Influence the Audit Committee's Effectiveness In Malaysia Listed Companies

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        EBIMCS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
        August 2019
        175 pages
        ISBN:9781450366496
        DOI:10.1145/3377817

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 March 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        EBIMCS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate31of142submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate143of708submissions,20%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader