skip to main content
10.1145/3377929.3390064acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Framework to select an improved radiographic image using Speed-constrained modified particle swarm optimization

Published:08 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Radiographic images suffer from contrast problems. Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) is a widely used local contrast enhancement algorithm that can solve this problem. There are no fixed values of CLAHE input parameters that always produce the best output images in terms of contrast enhancement for radiographic images, so to find the parameters that satisfy the optimal condition in a radiography image we use the Speed-constrained Modified Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization (SMPSO). Since the output is a set of solutions (called Pareto Set), in this paper we propose to use and compare a posteriori decision methods with a multi-objective approach, in order to select the solutions of the Pareto front that are aligned with the visual criteria of an expert. Three decision making methods were used (utility function-based, distance-based and a fuzzy method). In order to validate which decision methods gave better results, they were evaluated by a medical expert, concluding that methods based on utility functions and distance obtain better quality information. The Fuzzy method was discarded because it selects solutions with a lot of distortion.

References

  1. L. G. More, M. A. Brizuela, H. L. Ayala, D. P. Pinto-Roa, J. L. V. Noguera, "Parameter tuning of CLAHE based on multi-objective optimization to achieve different contrast levels in medical images", Image Processing (ICIP) 2015 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 4644--4648, 2015 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S.M. Pizer, E.P. Amburn, J.D. Austin, R. Cromartie, A. Geselowitz, T. Greer, B.T.H. Romeny, J.B. Zimmerman. "Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations", Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. 39 (1987) 355--368 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. X. Wang, B. S. Wong, and T. Chen Guan. "Image enhancement for radiography inspection", Proc. SPIE 5852, Third International Conference on Experimental Mechanics and Third Conference of the Asian Committee on Experimental Mechanics, (12 April 2005) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. J. Nebro, J. J. Durillo, J. Garcia-Nieto, C. A. C. Coello, F. Luna, E. Alba. "SMPSO: A new PSO-based metaheuristic for multi-objective optimization", Proc. IEEE Symp. Comput. Intell. Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, pp. 66--73, Mar./Apr. 2009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. W. Edwards and F. Barron, Smarts and smarter: Improved simple", Org. Behavior Human Decision Processes, vol. 60, pp. 306--325, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. K. Yoon and C. Hwang. "TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution)-a multiple attribute decision making, w: Multiple attribute decision making-methods and applications, a state-of-the-at survey," ed: Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. O. Parreiras, J. H. R. D. Maciel, and J. A. Vasconcelos. "The A Posteriori Decision in Multiobjective Optimization Problems With Smarts", Promethee II, and a Fuzzy Algorithm", IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 42, no. 4, april 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. G. Bradski, "Opencv," Dr. Dobb's Journal of Software Tools, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Durillo, A. Nebro, and E. Alba. "The jmetal framework for multi-objective optimization: Design and architecture," in Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2010 IEEE Congress on, pp. 1--8, July 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Roberts and P. Goodwin. "Weight approximations in multi-attribute decision models." Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 2002; 11:291--303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Framework to select an improved radiographic image using Speed-constrained modified particle swarm optimization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '20: Proceedings of the 2020 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
      July 2020
      1982 pages
      ISBN:9781450371278
      DOI:10.1145/3377929

      Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 July 2020

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader