skip to main content
10.1145/3378065.3378130acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiciipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

LOS and NLOS Signal Classification based on Advanced Particle Swarm Optimization for Acoustic Self-Calibrating Indoor Localization

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The demand for indoor positioning is exploding. For indoor positioning, TPSN ranging model with specific frequency band is often used based on android platform or others. Time of arrival (TOA) is often used as an important part to achieve efficient localization. The signal wav files classification of line of sight (LOS) and non-line of sight (NLOS) will be involved. Support Vector Machine (SVM) is often used to complete classification in most positioning systems and the effect is not so good. At this moment, in order to improve the performance of this system, the Shrinkage Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization (SEPSO) is introduced to improve the effect. Compared with traditional PSO, it introduces contraction coefficient to cope with the problem of few samples and non-linear system better than before. It also combines the non-linear decreasing inertia weight of asynchronous linear learning method with original algorithm to improve the ability of jumping out of local minimum area. Considering the actual use of those platforms, it improves the feature extraction algorithm and uses SEPSO to upgrade the performance of SVM from three aspects: training sample re-selection, parameter optimization and optimal preservation strategy (elitist strategy) of each generation population.

References

  1. Lei Zhang, DanJie Huang, XinHeng Wang, Christian Schindelhauer and Zhi Wang. 2017. Acoustic NLOS Identification Using Acoustic Channel Characteristics for Smartphone Indoor Localization. Sensors.17,727(2017). DOI=https://sci-hub.shop/10.3390/s17040727Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lin Feng, Zhang Lei, Li GuiNan and Wang Zhi. 2017. Acoustic Self-Calibrating Indoor Localization System via Smartphones. Journal of Computer Research and Development. 54, 12 (2017), 2741--2751. DOI= https://crad.ict.ac.cn/CN/10.7544/issn1000--1239.2017.20160727Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wen XiangJi. 2016. Research on Indoor Positioning System with Acoustic Signal based on Smartphones. Master Thesis. Zhejiang University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaikai Liu, Xinxin Liu and Xiaolin Li. 2016. Guoguo: Enabling Fine-grained Smartphone Localization via Acoustic Anchors. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.2016,15,1144--1156. DOI= https://sci-hub.shop/10.1109/tmc.2015.2451628Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fang WenHao. 2016. Node Self-localization and Passive Acoustic Source Target Positioning Based on Microphones of Smartphones. Master Thesis. Zhejiang University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang DanJie. 2017. Research on Acoustic-based Indoor Localization under NLOS Environment for Mobile Devices. Master Thesis. Zhejiang University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin Feng. 2018. Research and Implementation on Acoustic Self-Calibrating Indoor Localization System via Smartphones. Master Thesis. Zhejiang University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang WenHao, Xing ZhanYuan, Wen XiangJi, et al.2016. Passive acoustic source target positioning method based on smart phone platform TDOA estimation and system implementation. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument. 37, 4(2016), 952--960Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang XiaoChuan, Shi Feng, Yu Lei and Li Yang. 2011. MATLAB neural network case analysis of 43. Beihang University Press, ACM, Beijing, 119--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu Mingzhu, Li Xiaoqina and Chen Hongheng.2019. Research on Speech and Emotional Recognition Algorithm Based on Support Vector Machine. Journal of Harbin University of Science and Technology.24,4(2019). DOI= http://hlgxb.hrbust.edu.cn/oa/darticle.aspx?type=view&id=20190420Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ratnaweera A and Halgamuge SK, Watson HC. 2004. Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.2004,8(3), 240--255. DOI= https://sci-hub.shop/10.1109/TEVC.2004.826071Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chatterjee A and Siarry P. 2006. Nonlinear Inertai weight variation for dynamic adaptation in particle swarm optimization. Computers & Operations Research. 2006, 33(3):859--87. DOI=https://sci-hub.shop/10.1007/978--3-642--21515-5_10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shi YH and Eberhart R. 1998. A modified particle swarm optimizer. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. Anchorage, AK, USA.1998, 69--73. DOI=https://sci-hub.shop/10.1109/ICEC.1998.699146Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. LOS and NLOS Signal Classification based on Advanced Particle Swarm Optimization for Acoustic Self-Calibrating Indoor Localization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIIP '19: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing
      November 2019
      528 pages
      ISBN:9781450361910
      DOI:10.1145/3378065

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 April 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate87of367submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader