skip to main content
10.1145/3379156.3391350acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Impact of evoked reward expectation on ocular information during a controlled card game

Published: 02 June 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The possibility of assessing reward expectations was examined using the environment of a poker game which was controlled by the experimenters. Subjects were asked to express their degree of expectation of obtaining a reward from their bets at two stages of each hand. In the results, pupils dilated according to the extent of a subject’s reward expectation. In particular, as mean pupil sizes for the 2nd round of betting increased with the subject’s expectation of a reward during the game, there were significant differences between the three grades of expectations. Also, pupil sizes correlated with the change in expectation between the two rounds of each hand. Other indices such as saccade frequency and microsaccade frequency also responded to the expectation of a reward. These results provide evidence that metrics of oculo-motors can be an index of the level of reward expectation in the environment of a controlled card game.

References

[1]
Jackson Beatty. 1982. Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin 91, 2 (1982), 276–292.
[2]
Yoshinobu Ebisawa and Mitsuhiro Sugiura. 1998. Influences of Target and Fixation Point Conditions on Characteristics of Visually Guided Voluntary Saccade. The Journal of the Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers 52, 11 (1998), 1730–1737.
[3]
Ralf Engbert. 2006. Microsaccades: a microcosm for research on oculomotor control, attention, and visual perception. Progress in Brain Research 154 (2006), 177–192.
[4]
Ralf Engbert, Petra Sinn, Konstantin Mergenthaler, and Hans Trukenbrod. 2015. Microsaccade Toolbox 0.9. http://read.psych.uni-potsdam.de.
[5]
Eric Granholm and Stuart R. Steinhauer. 2004. Pupillometric measures of cognitive and emotional processes. Inernational Journal of Psychophysiology 52 (2004), 1–6.
[6]
Christoph Klein and Ulrich Ettinger (Eds.). 2019. Eye Movement Research –An Introduction to its Scientific Foundations and Applications. Springer Nature, Switzerland AG.
[7]
Krzysztof Krejtz, Andrew T. Duchowski, Anna Niedzielska, Cezary Biele, and Izabela Krejtz. 2018. Eye tracking cognitive load using pupil diameter and microsaccades with fixed gaze. PloS One 13(2018), 1–23.
[8]
J. Kuhlmann and M. Böttcher (Eds.). 1999. Pupillography: Principles, Methods and Applications. W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag, Munchen, Germany.
[9]
Kenji Matsumoto, Madoka Matsumoto, and Hiroshi Abe. 2006. Goal-based action selection and utility-based action bias. Neural Networks 19, 8 (2006), 1315–1320.
[10]
Minoru Nakayama. 2018. Ocular reactions in response to impressions of emotion-evoking pictures. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA 2018). ACM, New York, USA, 42(1–5).
[11]
Minoru Nakayama and Yoshiya Hayakawa. 2019. Relationships between Oculo-motor Measures as Task-evoked Mental Workloads during a Manipulation Task. In 23rd International Conference Information Visualisation (IV). 170–174.
[12]
Minoru Nakayama and Makoto Katsukura. 2011. Development of a system usability assessment procedure using oculo-motors for input operation. Universal Access in Information Society 10, 1 (2011), 51–68.
[13]
Yoshimi Ohgami, Yasunori Kotani, Tetsuji Tsukamoto, Kazufumi Omura, Yusuke Inoue, Yasutsugu Aihara, and Minoru Nakayama. 2006. Effects of monetary reward and punishment on stimulus-preceding negativity. Psychophysiology 43, 3 (2006), 227–236.
[14]
Vsevolod Peysakhovich, Mickaël Causse, Sébastien Scannella, and Frédéric Dehais. 2015. Frequency analysis of a task-evoked pupillary response: Luminance-independent measure of mental effort. International Journal of Psychophysiology 97 (2015), 30–37.
[15]
Martina Poletti and Michele Rucci. 2016. A compact field guide to the study of microsaccades: Challenges and functions. Vision Research 118(2016), 83–97.
[16]
Edmund T. Rolls and Gustavo Deco. 2002. Computational Neuroscience of Vision. Oxford University Press, Oxford UK.
[17]
James B. Rowe, Doris Eckstein, Todd Braver, and Adreinne M. Owen. 2008. How Does Reward Expectation Influence Cognition in the Human Brain?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20, 11 (2008), 1980–1992.
[18]
Anil K. Seth, Tony J. Prescott, and Joanna J. Bryson. 2012. Modelling Natural Action Selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
[19]
Kohei Shoda and Minoru Nakayama. 2019. Measuring reward expectation during a controlled Poker game using pupillary change. In International Pupil Colloquium 2019.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Impact of reward expectation on pupillary change during an adaptive two player card gameProceedings of the 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications10.1145/3649902.3655649(1-2)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
  • (2022)Using Mean Pupil Diameter Change to Analyze Behavioral Performance in Multitasking Training Game2022 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871751(1090-1093)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ETRA '20 Short Papers: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
June 2020
305 pages
ISBN:9781450371346
DOI:10.1145/3379156
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 June 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Eye movement
  2. Microsaccade
  3. Pupil response
  4. Reward expectation

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

ETRA '20

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 137 submissions, 50%

Upcoming Conference

ETRA '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Impact of reward expectation on pupillary change during an adaptive two player card gameProceedings of the 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications10.1145/3649902.3655649(1-2)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
  • (2022)Using Mean Pupil Diameter Change to Analyze Behavioral Performance in Multitasking Training Game2022 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871751(1090-1093)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media