skip to main content
10.1145/3379247.3379289acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccdeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Multi-Level Evaluation Index System and Quantitative Evaluation Model for Multi Domain Consistency in Parallel and Distributed Simulation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Consistency assessment is an important measure to ensure that distributed modeling and simulation results are correct and credible, and is crucial for maintaining the global consistency of Parallel and Distributed Simulation Systems (PDSS). Based on the hierarchical framework of PDSS, this paper proposes a multi-level evaluation index system combining the qualitative and quantitative evaluation, static and dynamic evaluation, covering the resource platform layer, simulation model layer, simulation service layer, user cognition layer, etc. Based on this, a consistency evaluation model of PDSS is proposed, which includes three parts: the assignment method of weight, the evaluation index system of consistency and the quantitative evaluation standard of consistency. The research in this paper provides feedback and guidance for the consistency maintenance and improvement of PDSSs.

References

  1. UU Rahman, O Hakeem, M Raheem. 2015. Nutshell: Cloud simulation and current trends. In Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart City (Chengdu, China, December 19-21, 2015). IEEE, New York, NY, 77--86. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartCity.2015.51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D'Angelo Gabriele, Marzolla Moreno. 2014. New trends in parallel and distributed simulation: From many-cores to Cloud Computing. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2014, (49), 320--335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Shi Xiangning, Fan Linjun, Ling Yunxiang. 2015. Dynamic and Quantitative Method of Analyzing Clock Inconsistency Factors among Distributed Nodes. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2015, 40(2), 519--530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jung, J J. 2009. Consensus-based evaluation framework for PDSStributed information retrieval systems. Knowledge and Information Systems. 2009, 18(2), 199--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Koruca HI, Ozdemir G, Aydemir E, et al. 2010. The simulation-based performance measurement in an evaluation module. Expert Systems with Applications. 2010, 37, 8211--8220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hogo M A. 2010. Evaluation of e-learning systems based on fuzzy clustering models and statistical tools. Expert Systems with Applications. 2010, 37, 6891--6903.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ZHAO Hui-Qun, SUN Jing. 2010. A Methodological Study of Evaluating the Dependability of SOA Software System. Chinese journal of computers. 2010, 33(11), 2202--2209. (in Chinese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sun Shixiang. 2005. Research on Credibility Evaluation of Modeling and Simulation in Complex Large System. Doctoral Thesis. Changsha, China: National University of Defense Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Valadares Arthur, Gabrielova Eugenia, Lopes, C V. 2016. On designing and testing PDSStributed virtual environments. Concurrency Computation. 2016, 28(12), 3291--3312. (in Chinese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Linjun Fan, Jun Tang, Yunxiang Ling, et al. 2014. Dynamic and quantitative method of analyzing service consistency evolution based on extended hierarchical finite state automata. The Scientific World Journal. 2014(2014), 793271, 11pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Linjun Fan, Yunxiang Ling, et al. 2014. Quantitative evaluation of model consistency evolution in compositional service-oriented simulation using a connected hyper-digraph. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE C (Computers & Electronics). 2014, 15(1), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. FAN Lin-Jun, LING Yun-Xiang, WANG Tao, YAN Hou-Yi. 2013. Exploring Hierarchical Consistency Based on Generalized Time-Space Field in Distributed Simulation Application. Journal of Software. 2013, 24(2), 317--330. (in Chinese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Multi-Level Evaluation Index System and Quantitative Evaluation Model for Multi Domain Consistency in Parallel and Distributed Simulation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCDE '20: Proceedings of 2020 6th International Conference on Computing and Data Engineering
      January 2020
      279 pages
      ISBN:9781450376730
      DOI:10.1145/3379247

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 March 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader