skip to main content
10.1145/3379503.3403567acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Increasing User Experience and Trust in Automated Vehicles via an Ambient Light Display

Published:05 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today’s developments in the automotive industry are moving towards automated driving. At the highest levels, the driver becomes the passenger, which presents a new challenge for human-computer interaction. People not only have to trust in the automated system but are also confronted with increased complexity, as it is often not clear what the automated vehicle is about to do. An ambient light display is one way to give the driver a clearer picture of the car’s intentions and to keep complexity low. We have examined the impact on trust and user experience in more detail using two concepts for an ambient light display. One design provides information about detected potential conflicts in the current trajectory. The other design also highlights the future trajectory. We implemented both concepts as virtual light bars at the bottom of the screens. We evaluated them in a fixed-base driving simulator with 18 participants against each other and a baseline condition without additional information. Our scenario is a fully automated journey (SAE Level 5) through a German town. Although the two concepts do not differ much from each other, only the display showing both information – possible conflicts and future driving route – provided a clear added value for the users.

References

  1. Adobe. 2019. Adobe After Effects kaufen | Special Effects und Motion Graphics. Retrieved June 18, 2019 from https://www.adobe.com/de/products/aftereffects.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Adobe. 2019. Adobe Premiere Pro kaufen | Videobearbeitung und Videoproduktion. Retrieved June 18, 2019 from https://www.adobe.com/de/products/premiere.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthony L. Baker and Joseph R. Keebler. 2017. Factors Affecting Performance of Human-Automation Teams. In Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems, Pamela Savage-Knepshield and Jessie Chen (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41959-6_27Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Johnell O. Brooks, Richard R. Goodenough, Matthew C. Crisler, Nathan D. Klein, Rebecca L. Alley, Beatrice L. Koon, William C. Logan, Jennifer H. Ogle, Richard A. Tyrrell, and Rebekkah F. Wills. 2010. Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies. Accident Analysis & Prevention 42, 3 (2010), 788 – 796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J.K. Caird, W.J. Horrey, and C.J. Edwards. 2001. Effects of Conformal and Nonconformal Vision Enhancement Systems on Older-Driver Performance. Transportation Research Record 1759, 1 (2001), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.3141/1759-05Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Oliver Carsten and Marieke H Martens. 2019. How can humans understand their automated cars? HMI principles, problems and solutions. Cognition, Technology & Work 21, 1 (2019), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0484-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cyriel Diels and Jelte E Bos. 2016. Self-driving carsickness. Applied Ergonomics 53(2016), 374 – 382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Marc Dziennus, Johann Kelsch, and Anna Schieben. 2016. Ambient light based interaction concept for an integrative driver assistance system – a driving simulator study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2015 Annual Conference. 171–182. https://www.hfes-europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Dziennus2016.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. F. Ekman, M. Johansson, and J. Sochor. 2018. Creating Appropriate Trust in Automated Vehicle Systems: A Framework for HMI Design. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 48, 1 (2018), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2017.2776209Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Y. Forster, F. Naujoks, and A. Neukum. 2017. Increasing anthropomorphism and trust in automated driving functions by adding speech output. In 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (Los Angeles, CA). IEEE, 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2017.7995746Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Anna-Katharina Frison, Philipp Wintersberger, and Andreas Riener. 2019. Resurrecting the ghost in the shell: A need-centered development approach for optimizing user experience in highly automated vehicles. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 65 (2019), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Anna-Katharina Frison, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, Clemens Schartmüller, Linda Ng Boyle, Erika Miller, and Klemens Weigl. 2019. In UX We Trust: Investigation of Aesthetics and Usability of Driver-Vehicle Interfaces and Their Impact on the Perception of Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300374Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Tom M Gasser, Clemens Arzt, Mihiar Ayoubi, Arne Bartels, Lutz Bürkle, Jana Eier, Frank Flemisch, Dirk Häcker, Tobias Hesse, Werner Huber, 2013. Legal consequences of an increase in vehicle automation. Technical Report. Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen. https://bast.opus.hbz-nrw.de/opus45-bast/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/689/file/Legal_consequences_of_an_increase_in_vehicle_automation.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Science Media Center Germany GmbH. 2017. Mehr Sicherheit durch automatisiertes Fahren?Retrieved June 13, 2019 from https://www.sciencemediacenter.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Fact_Sheets_PDF/Sicherheit-Autonomes-Fahren_SMC-Factsheet_2017-11-06_aktualisiert.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Toni Granollers. 2018. Usability Evaluation with Heuristics, Beyond Nielsen’s List. In ACHI 2018: The Eleventh International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (Rome, Italy). IARIA, Wilmington, DE, USA, 60 – 65. https://www.thinkmind.org/articles/achi_2018_4_10_20055.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kevin Anthony Hoff and Masooda Bashir. 2015. Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors 57, 3 (2015), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jiun-Yin Jian, Ann M Bisantz, and Colin G Drury. 2000. Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4, 1 (2000), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. Johns, B. Mok, D. Sirkin, N. Gowda, C. Smith, W. Talamonti, and W. Ju. 2016. Exploring shared control in automated driving. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (Christchurch, New Zealand). IEEE, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451738Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Juffrizal Karjanto, Nidzamuddin [Md. Yusof], Chao Wang, Jacques Terken, Frank Delbressine, and Matthias Rauterberg. 2018. The effect of peripheral visual feedforward system in enhancing situation awareness and mitigating motion sickness in fully automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 58 (2018), 678 – 692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sari Kujala, Virpi Roto, Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, Evangelos Karapanos, and Arto Sinnelä. 2011. UX Curve: A method for evaluating long-term user experience. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (07 2011), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.06.005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Alexander Kunze, Stephen J. Summerskill, Russell Marshall, and Ashleigh J. Filtness. 2017. Enhancing Driving Safety and User Experience Through Unobtrusive and Function-Specific Feedback. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct(Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3131762Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Alexander Kunze, Stephen J. Summerskill, Russell Marshall, and Ashleigh J. Filtness. 2019. Conveying Uncertainties Using Peripheral Awareness Displays in the Context of Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344537Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Florian Laquai, Fabian Chowanetz, and Gerhard Rigoll. 2011. A large-scale LED array to support anticipatory driving. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. IEEE, 2087–2092. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2011.6083980Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Bettina Laugwitz, Theo Held, and Martin Schrepp. 2008. Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire. HCI and Usability for Education and Work. USAB 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5298(2008), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-540-89350-9_6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. John D Lee and Katrina A See. 2004. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human factors 46, 1 (2004), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Todd Litman. 2020. Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions: Implications for Transport Planning. Technical Report. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. http://www.vtpi.org/avip.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Andreas Löcken, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2016. AutoAmbiCar: Using Ambient Light to Inform Drivers About Intentions of Their Automated Cars. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’16 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3004323.3004329Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Andreas Löcken, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2016. Enlightening Drivers: A Survey on In-Vehicle Light Displays. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (Automotive’UI 16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005416Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. A. Löcken, P. Wintersberger, A. Frison, and A. Riener. 2019. Investigating User Requirements for Communication Between Automated Vehicles and Vulnerable Road Users. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, 879–884. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2019.8814027Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sascha Mahlke, Diana Rösler, Katharina Seifert, Josef F Krems, and Manfred Thüring. 2007. Evaluation of six night vision enhancement systems: Qualitative and quantitative support for intelligent image processing. Human Factors 49, 3 (2007), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007X200148Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Stephanie M. Merritt. 2011. Affective Processes in Human–Automation Interactions. Human Factors 53, 4 (2011), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811411912Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Stephanie M Merritt, Heather Heimbaugh, Jennifer LaChapell, and Deborah Lee. 2013. I trust it, but I don’t know why: Effects of implicit attitudes toward automation on trust in an automated system. Human factors 55, 3 (2013), 520–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812465081Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Christine Döttlinger, Christina Rödel, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. ChaseLight: Ambient LED Stripes to Control Driving Speed. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799279Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Bonnie M. Muir. 1994. Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics 37, 11 (1994), 1905–1922. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408964957Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Heiko Müller, Andreas Löcken, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2014. Sparkle: An Ambient Light Display for Dynamic off-Screen Points of Interest. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (Helsinki, Finland) (NordiCHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639205Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Raja Parasuraman and Victor Riley. 1997. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human factors 39, 2 (1997), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Bastian Pfleging, Maurice Rang, and Nora Broy. 2016. Investigating User Needs for Non-Driving-Related Activities during Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Rovaniemi, Finland) (MUM ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012709.3012735Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Matthias Pfromm, Stephan Cieler, and Ralph Bruder. 2013. Driver assistance via optical information with spatial reference. In 16th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC 2013). IEEE, 2006–2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2013.6728524Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Ryan Powell. 2019. Trusting Driverless Cars. Retrieved June 15, 2019 from https://design.google/library/trusting-driverless-cars/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Samantha Reig, Selena Norman, Cecilia G. Morales, Samadrita Das, Aaron Steinfeld, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2018. A Field Study of Pedestrians and Autonomous Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239064Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Andreas Riegler, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2019. Augmented Reality Windshield Displays and Their Potential to Enhance User Experience in Automated Driving. i-com 18, 2 (2019), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2018-0033Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. SAE. 2018. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles (J3016_201806). Retrieved June 13, 2019 from https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201806/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. T. L. Sanders, T. Wixon, K. E. Schafer, J. Y. C. Chen, and P. A. Hancock. 2014. The influence of modality and transparency on trust in human-robot interaction. In 2014 IEEE International Inter-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA). IEEE, 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogSIMA.2014.6816556Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Clemens Schartmüller, Andreas Riener, Philipp Wintersberger, and Anna-Katharina Frison. 2018. Workaholistic: On Balancing Typing- and Handover-Performance in Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Barcelona, Spain) (MobileHCI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229459Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Sandra Trösterer, Martin Wuchse, Christine Döttlinger, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. Light My Way: Visualizing Shared Gaze in the Car. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799258Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Fabian Utesch. 2014. Unscharfe Warnungen im Kraftfahrzeug. Eignet sich eine LED-Leiste als Anzeige für Fahrerassistenzsysteme?Ph.D. Dissertation. Technischen Universität Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig. https://publikationsserver.tu-braunschweig.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/dbbs_derivate_00035918/Diss_Utesch_Fabian.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Verband der Automobilindustrie e. V.2015. Automatisierung – Von Fahrerassistenzsystemen zum automatisierten Fahren. Technical Report. VDA. https://www.vda.de/de/services/Publikationen/automatisierung.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Philipp Wintersberger, Anna Katharina A.-K. Frison, Andreas Riener, and Tamara Von Sawitzky. 2019. Fostering user acceptance and trust in fully automated vehicles: Evaluating the potential of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 27, 1(2019), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00320Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Jens Zihsler, Philipp Hock, Marcel Walch, Kirill Dzuba, Denis Schwager, Patrick Szauer, and Enrico Rukzio. 2016. Carvatar: Increasing Trust in Highly-Automated Driving Through Social Cues. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’16 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3004323.3004354Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Increasing User Experience and Trust in Automated Vehicles via an Ambient Light Display
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '20: 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
      October 2020
      418 pages
      ISBN:9781450375160
      DOI:10.1145/3379503

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 October 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format