skip to main content
10.1145/3383313.3411532acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

RecSys 2020 Challenge Workshop: Engagement Prediction on Twitter’s Home Timeline

Published:22 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The workshop features presentations of accepted contributions to the RecSys Challenge 2020, organized by Politecnico di Bari, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, TU Wien, University of Colorado, Boulder, and Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, and sponsored by Twitter. The challenge focuses on a real-world task of Tweet engagement prediction in a dynamic environment. The goal is to predict the probability for different types of engagement (Like, Reply, Retweet, and Retweet with comment) of a target user for a set of Tweets, based on heterogeneous input data. To this end, Twitter has released a large public dataset of ~160M public Tweets, obtained by subsampling within ~2 weeks, that contains engagement features, user features, and Tweet features. A peculiarity of this challenge is related to the recent regulations on data protection and privacy. The challenge data set was compliant: if a user deleted a Tweet, or their data from Twitter, the dataset was promptly updated. Moreover, each change in the dataset implied new evaluations of all submissions and the update of the leaderboard metrics.

The challenge was well received with 1,131 registered users. In the final phase, 20 teams were competing for the winning position. These teams had an average size of approximately 4 participants and developed an overall number of 127 different methods.

References

  1. Fabian Abel, Yashar Deldjoo, Mehdi Elahi, and Daniel Kohlsdorf. 2017. RecSys Challenge 2017: Offline and Online Evaluation. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Como, Italy) (RecSys ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 372–373. https://doi.org/10.1145/3109859.3109954Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Vito Walter Anelli, Andrea Calì, Tommaso Di Noia, Matteo Palmonari, and Azzurra Ragone. 2016. Exposing Open Street Map in the Linked Data Cloud. In Trends in Applied Knowledge-Based Systems and Data Science - 29th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, IEA/AIE 2016, Morioka, Japan, August 2-4, 2016, Proceedings(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9799), Hamido Fujita, Moonis Ali, Ali Selamat, Jun Sasaki, and Masaki Kurematsu (Eds.). Springer, 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42007-3_29Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Vito Walter Anelli and Tommaso Di Noia. 2019. 2nd Workshop on Knowledge-aware and Conversational Recommender Systems - KaRS. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2019, Beijing, China, November 3-7, 2019, Wenwu Zhu, Dacheng Tao, Xueqi Cheng, Peng Cui, Elke A. Rundensteiner, David Carmel, Qi He, and Jeffrey Xu Yu (Eds.). ACM, 3001–3002. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357384.3358805Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Vito Walter Anelli, Tommaso Di Noia, Eugenio Di Sciascio, Azzurra Ragone, and Joseph Trotta. 2019. Local Popularity and Time in top-N Recommendation. In Advances in Information Retrieval - 41st European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2019, Cologne, Germany, April 14-18, 2019, Proceedings, Part I(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11437), Leif Azzopardi, Benno Stein, Norbert Fuhr, Philipp Mayr, Claudia Hauff, and Djoerd Hiemstra(Eds.). Springer, 861–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15712-8_63Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Luca Belli, Sofia Ira Ktena, Alykhan Tejani, Alexandre Lung-Yut-Fon, Frank Portman, Xiao Zhu, Yuanpu Xie, Akshay Gupta, Michael Bronstein, Amra Delić, 2020. Privacy-Preserving Recommender Systems Challenge on Twitter’s Home Timeline. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13715(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ching-Wei Chen, Paul Lamere, Markus Schedl, and Hamed Zamani. 2018. Recsys Challenge 2018: Automatic Music Playlist Continuation. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) (RecSys ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 527–528. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240323.3240342Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 785–794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Amra Delic, Judith Masthoff, Julia Neidhardt, and Hannes Werthner. 2018. How to Use Social Relationships in Group Recommenders: Empirical Evidence. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, UMAP 2018, Singapore, July 08-11, 2018, Tanja Mitrovic, Jie Zhang, Li Chen, and David Chin(Eds.). ACM, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209219.3209226Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. arxiv:1810.04805 [cs.CL]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chuong B Do, Quoc V Le, and Chuan-Sheng Foo. 2009. Proximal regularization for online and batch learning. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning. 257–264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Guolin Ke, Qi Meng, Thomas Finley, Taifeng Wang, Wei Chen, Weidong Ma, Qiwei Ye, and Tie-Yan Liu. 2017. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 3146–3154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Peter Knees, Yashar Deldjoo, Farshad Bakhshandegan Moghaddam, Jens Adamczak, Gerard-Paul Leyson, and Philipp Monreal. 2019. RecSys Challenge 2019: Session-Based Hotel Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Copenhagen, Denmark) (RecSys ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 570–571. https://doi.org/10.1145/3298689.3346974Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Federico Monti, Michael Bronstein, and Xavier Bresson. 2017. Geometric matrix completion with recurrent multi-graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems(Long Beach, California, USA) (NIPS’17). Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 3700–3710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Liudmila Prokhorenkova, Gleb Gusev, Aleksandr Vorobev, Anna Veronika Dorogush, and Andrey Gulin. 2018. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 6638–6648.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pablo Sánchez and Alejandro Bellogín. 2018. Time-Aware Novelty Metrics for Recommender Systems. In Advances in Information Retrieval - 40th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2018, Grenoble, France, March 26-29, 2018, Proceedings(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10772), Gabriella Pasi, Benjamin Piwowarski, Leif Azzopardi, and Allan Hanbury (Eds.). Springer, 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_27Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Victor Sanh, Lysandre Debut, Julien Chaumond, and Thomas Wolf. 2019. DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01108(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gábor Takács and Domonkos Tikk. 2012. Alternating least squares for personalized ranking. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM conference on Recommender systems. 83–90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sergio Torrijos, Alejandro Bellogín, and Pablo Sánchez. 2020. Discovering Related Users in Location-based Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, UMAP 2020, Genoa, Italy, July 12-18, 2020, Tsvi Kuflik, Ilaria Torre, Robin Burke, and Cristina Gena (Eds.). ACM, 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340631.3394882Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    RecSys '20: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
    September 2020
    796 pages
    ISBN:9781450375832
    DOI:10.1145/3383313

    Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 September 2020

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

    Upcoming Conference

    RecSys '24
    18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
    October 14 - 18, 2024
    Bari , Italy

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format