skip to main content
10.1145/3383812.3383831acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicigpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Resolving Interference in Time of Flight Range Sensors via Sparse Recovery Algorithm

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

A popular imaging technique called Time of Flight (ToF) camera provides a depth information in real time. Several applications like augmented reality (AR) applications, machine automation in factories, hand gesture controls, in military for autonomous navigation and object localization in robotics, ego motion estimation etc. are good source of ToF depth camera. These applications demand good accuracy to provide required services. ToF fulfill this demand of accuracy, however, faces problem like multipath interference (MPI). The MPI phenomena hampers the accuracy of depth map recovery and it can be up to several centimeters. In this paper, we solved the MPI problem by exploiting the sparsity of the received signal. We proposed an approach of sparse regularization technique based on compressed sensing framework with some modification such as applying positive and proximity constraint. This sparse recovery algorithm applied is robust for the MPI with two path. We demonstrate and validate the simulation results of our proposed algorithm for MPI removal.

References

  1. Falie, D., and V. Buzuloiu.:Further investigations on ToF cameras distance errors and their corrections.In Circuits and Systems for Communications, 2008. ECCSC 2008. 4th European Conference on, pp. 197--200. IEEE, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dorrington, Adrian A., John P. Godbaz, Michael J. Cree, Andrew D. Payne, and Lee V. Streeter.: Separating true range measurements from multi-path and scattering interference in commercial range cameras. In Three-Dimensional Imaging, Interaction, and Measurement, vol. 7864, p. 786404.International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Godbaz, John Peter, Michael J. Cree, and Adrian A. Dorrington.: Undue influence: Mitigating range-intensity coupling in AMCW 'flash'lidar using scene texture.In Image and Vision Computing New Zealand, 2009. IVCNZ'09. 24th International Conference, pp. 304--309. IEEE, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Godbaz, John P., Michael J. Cree, and Adrian A. Dorrington.: Closed-form inverses for the mixed pixel/multipath interference problem in amcw lidar. In Computational Imaging X, vol. 8296, p. 829618. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kirmani, Ahmed, Arrigo Benedetti, and Philip A. Chou.:Spumic Simultaneous phase unwrapping and multipath interference cancellation in time-of-flight cameras using spectral methods.In Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 1--6. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhandari, Ayush, Micha Feigin, Shahram Izadi, Christoph Rhemann, Mirko Schmidt, and Ramesh Raskar: Resolving multipath interference in Kinect:An inverse problem approach. In SENSORS, 2014 IEEE, pp. 614--617. IEEE, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Freedman, Daniel, Yoni Smolin, Eyal Krupka, Ido Leichter, and Mirko Schmidt.:SRA: Fast removal of general multipath for ToF sensors.In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 234--249. Springer, Cham, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Patil, Swati Suresh, and V. S. Inamdar: Multipath mitigation in Time of Flight 3D sensor based on direct and global seperation technique. In Computing, Analytics and Security Trends (CAST), International Conference on, pp. 632--636. IEEE, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhandari, Ayush, Achuta Kadambi, Refael Whyte, Christopher Barsi, Micha Feigin, Adrian Dorrington, and Ramesh Raskar: Resolving multipath interference in time-of-flight imaging via modulation frequency diversity and sparse regularization.Optics letters 39, no.6 (2014): 1705--1708.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Mure-Dubois and H. Huegli. "Real time scattering compensation for time-of-flight camera", In Proceedings of the ICVS Workshop on Camera Calibration Methods for Computer Vision Systems, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Mure-Dubois and H. H ¨ ugly, "Optimized scattering compensation for time-of-flight camera," in Optics East 2007. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 67620H-67620H, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuchs, S., "Multipath interference compensation in time-of-flight camera images," in Proceedings of the 2010--20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp.3583--3586, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Jimenez, D. Pizarro, M. Mazo, and S. Palazuelos, "Modeling and correction of multipath interference in time of flight cameras," in the Elsevier Journal of Image and Vision Computing, vol. (32)(1), pp. 1--13, (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Fuchs, M. Suppa, and O. Hellwich, "Compensation for multipath in tof camera measurements supported by photometric calibration and environment integration," in Computer Vision Systems, Springer, pp. 31--41, (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Foix, S.; Alenya, G.; Torras, C. Lock-in time-of-flight (ToF) cameras: A survey. IEEE Sens. J. 2011, 11, 1917--1926.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. BRUCKSTEIN, A. M., ELAD, M., AND ZIBULEVSKY, M. 2008. On the uniqueness of nonnegative sparse solutions to underdetermined systems of equations. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on 54, 11, 4813--4820.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Resolving Interference in Time of Flight Range Sensors via Sparse Recovery Algorithm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIGP '20: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing
      February 2020
      172 pages
      ISBN:9781450377201
      DOI:10.1145/3383812

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 March 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader