skip to main content
10.1145/3383845.3383860acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Content and Predictors of Government Stereotype in China: The Role of Medias and Social Attitudes

Published: 05 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

When thinking of or talking about "government", some words would come to people's minds, which stem from inadequate cognition of government. These words representing the public's stereotype toward government will cause a blockage in their interactions with government. Therefore, this research aimed to propose the content of government stereotype in China, and explore its predictors. Based on the results of a previous free-response study in 2013, we adopted checklist method and the stereotype differential technique in this research in 2015, finding that the content of government stereotype contained "distant", "not warm", "not dedicative", "not just" and "not clean". Regression analysis revealed that the medias for getting information could predict the government stereotype. Specifically, people who often focus on TV, CPC (the Communist Party of China) newspapers and journals, government websites and mainstream news websites like Xinhua and People.com.cn, had a more positive stereotype toward government. In addition, life satisfaction and perception of social justice also influenced government stereotype significantly. The implications of research on public management are discussed.

References

[1]
Hilton, J. L. and Von Hippel, J. L. 1996. Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology. 47, 1, 237--271.
[2]
Ufkes, E. G., Otten, S., van der Zee, K. I., Giebels, E., and Dovidio, J. F. 2011. The effect of stereotype content on anger versus contempt in "day-to-day" conflicts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 15, 1, 57--74.
[3]
Zhang, S., Wang, E., and Zhou, J. 2012. The motivation mechanism of collective action in different contexts. Acta psychologica sinica. 44, 4, 524--545.
[4]
Lodewijkx, H. F. M., Kersten, G. L. E., and Van Zomeren, M. 2008. Dual pathways to engage in 'silent marches' against violence: Moral outrage, moral cleansing and modes of identification. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 18, 3, 153--167.
[5]
Leach, C. W., Iyer, A., and Pedersen, A. 2007. Angry opposition to government redress: When the structurally advantaged perceive themselves as relatively deprived. British Journal of Social Psychology. 46, 1, 191--204.
[6]
Smith, H. J., Cronin, T., and Kessler, T. 2008. Anger, fear, or sadness: Faculty members' emotional reactions to collective pay disadvantage. Political Psychology. 29, 2, 221--246.
[7]
Fischer, A. H. and Roseman, I. J. 2007. Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social psychology. 93, 1, 103--115.
[8]
Ruan, X., Zhang, Q., Du, X., and Cui, Q. 2009. A review of study on stereotype threat effect. Advances in Psychological Science. 17, 4, 836--844.
[9]
Devine, P. G. and Baker, S. M. 1991. Measurement of racial stereotype subtyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 17, 1, 44--50.
[10]
Hu, Z., Liang, N., and Xu, W. 2004. A study on college students' occupational stereotype and its influencing factors. Psychological Science. 27, 3, 628--631.
[11]
Haddock, G. and Zanna, M. P. 1998. On the use of open-ended measures to assess attitude components. British Journal of Social Psychology. 37, 2, 129--149.
[12]
Katz, D. and Braly, K. 1993. Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 28, 3, 280--290.
[13]
Devine, P. G. and Elliot, A. J. 1995. Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 21, 11, 1139--1150.
[14]
Gardner, R. C. 1973. Ethnic stereotypes: The traditional approach, a new look. Canadian Psychologist Psychologie Canadienne. 14, 2, 133--148.
[15]
Gardner, R. C., Wonnacott, E. J., and Taylor, D. M. 1968. Ethnic stereotypes: A factor analytic investigation. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 22, 1, 35--44.
[16]
Jia, Q., Zhang, S., and Zhou, J. 2019. People's knowledge of government: Content, composition, structure, and function of government schemas in mainland China. Unpublished paper.
[17]
Chang, D. F. and Demyan, A. L. 2007. Teachers' stereotypes of Asian, Black, and White students. School Psychology Quarterly. 22, 2, 91--114.
[18]
Lupia, A. 2000. The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know. American Political Science Association. 94, 2, 178--178.
[19]
James, O. 2011. Performance Measures and democracy: Information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory. 21, 3, 399--418.
[20]
Li, B. and Li. D. 2013. The relationship between life satisfaction, public satisfaction with government and collective active. Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences). 33, 2, 90--95. (in Chinese)
[21]
Wang, Z. 2010. Citizens' Satisfaction with Government Performance in Six Asian-Pacific Giants. Japanese Journal of Political Science. 11, 1, 51--75.
[22]
Cook, K. S. 1986. Distributive Justice: A social psychological perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly. 31, 4, 677.
[23]
Folger, R. and Cropanzano, R. 1998. Organizational justice and human resource management. Sage Publications. 37, 3, 517--518.
[24]
Zhu, Z., Wu, S., Li, J., Shi, Z, and Wang, W. 2010. Teachers' belief in a just world and their satisfaction with life and government in 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake sites. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology. 18, 1, 79--81.
[25]
Liu, X., Chen, Z. and Zhao, Y. 2012. The procedural fairness prior to the monetary compensation: The determinants of the degree of farmers' satisfaction at levying their land. Management World. 2, 44--51.
[26]
Wu, H. Zhang, Y. and Liu, X. 2013. Asymmetry effect of "not + adjective" structure. Data of Culture and Education. 20, 26--27. (in Chinese)

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICCMB '20: Proceedings of the 2020 the 3rd International Conference on Computers in Management and Business
January 2020
303 pages
ISBN:9781450376778
DOI:10.1145/3383845
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • Univ. of Manchester: University of Manchester
  • The Hong Kong Polytechnic: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 April 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Government stereotype
  2. life satisfaction
  3. media
  4. social justice

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Key project of The National Social Science Fund of China
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China

Conference

ICCMB 2020

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 83
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media