skip to main content
10.1145/3383845.3383897acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Planning Supply with 'Opportunity Goods': Complementing Premium Parts with Select Discount Components

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we introduce the notion of an "opportunity good" as a discount production input that may prove of satisfactory quality upon inspection and otherwise can be returned to the supplier. While in a quality-sensitive setting it is never optimal to source only opportunity goods without ever running out of stock, it is often best to complement high-quality premium inputs by a significant fraction of goods that are of low but sufficiently high-variance quality, provided they can be returned at a reasonable fee. Such dual sourcing of components is currently being used in certain industries to produce sensitive equipment. In an EOQ framework, we examine the optimal production input split between opportunity goods and high-quality inputs.

References

  1. Keynes, J.M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Harcourt Brace, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow, K.J., Karlin, S. and Scarf, H. 1958. Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Inventory and Production. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Harris, F.W. 1913. How many parts to make at once. Factory, The Magazine of Management 10, 2 (Feb. 1913), 135-136, 152. [Reprinted in: Oper. Res. 38, 6 (Nov.-Dec. 1990), 947--950. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.38.6.947.]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Andriolo, A., Battini, D., Grubbström, R.W., Persona, A. and Sgarbossa, F. 2014. A century of evolution from Harris's basic lot size model: Survey and research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 155 (Sep. 2014), 16--38. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.01.013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Erlenkotter, D. 2014. Ford Whitman Harris's economic lot size model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 155 (Sep. 2014), 12--15. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Salameh, M.K. and Jaber, M.Y. 2000. Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 64, 1-3 (Mar. 2000), 59--64. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00044-4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Maddah, B. and Jaber, M.Y. 2008. Economic order quantity for items with imperfect quality: Revisited. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 112, 2 (Apr. 2008), 808--815. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.07.003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Khan, M., Jaber, M.Y., Guiffrida, A.L. and Zolfaghari, S. 2011. A review of extensions of a modified EOQ model for imperfect quality items. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 132, 1 (Jul. 2011), 1--12. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Papachristos, S. and Konstantaras, I. 2006. Economic ordering quantity models for items with imperfect quality. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 100, 1 (Mar. 2006), 148--154. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chang, H.-C. and Ho, C.-H. 2010. Exact closed-form solutions for "optimal inventory model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering." Omega 38, 3-4 (Jun.-Aug. 2010), 233--237. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.09.006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Eroglu, A. and Ozdemir, G. 2007. An economic order quantity model with defective items and shortages. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 106, 2 (Apr. 2007), 544--549. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.06.015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Skouri, K., Konstantaras, I., Lagodimos, A.G. and Papachristos, S. 2014. An EOQ model with backorders and rejection of defective supply batches. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 155 (Sep. 2014), 148--154. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.11.017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Taleizadeh, A.A., Khanbaglo, M.P.S. and Cárdenas-Barrón, L.E. 2016. An EOQ inventory model with partial backordering and reparation of imperfect products. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 182 (Dec. 2016), 418--434. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Wee, H.M., Yu, J. and Chen, M.C. 2007. Optimal inventory model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering. Omega 35, 1 (Feb. 2007), 7--11. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.01.019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Bertsekas, D.P. 1995. Nonlinear Programming. Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chao, M.T. and Strawderman, W.E. 1972. Negative moments of positive random variables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 67, 338 (Jun. 1972), 429--431. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10482404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Planning Supply with 'Opportunity Goods': Complementing Premium Parts with Select Discount Components

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCMB '20: Proceedings of the 2020 the 3rd International Conference on Computers in Management and Business
      January 2020
      303 pages
      ISBN:9781450376778
      DOI:10.1145/3383845

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 April 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader