skip to main content
10.1145/3383923.3383958acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enhancing Computing Curriculum with Collaborative Engagement Model to Enrich Undergraduate Research Experience

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Attracting and engaging computer science students to enhance their thinking skills are challenging tasks. In the past 10 years, the Computing Program at the Macao Polytechnic Institute encouraged our undergraduate students in doing research work, striving to enhance their mathematical and algorithmic thinking skills as well as to engage them in their study. We are convinced that these experiences change students' perception of computer science and how they can be part of the innovation engine throughout their career in science and technology. This paper discusses the MPI Collaborative Undergraduate Research Engagement model which consists of three main building blocks: team work and interpersonal skills, domain knowledge building, and technical communications. Besides computer science, we believe that our model can also be applied to other disciplines.

References

  1. Halim MHA, Buniyamin N., Imazawa A., Naoe N. and Ito M. 2014. The role of Final Year Project and Capstone Project in undergraduate engineering education in Malaysia and Japan. In Proceedings 2014 IEEE 6th Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Smith, B. L. & MacGregor, J. T. 1992. What Is Collaborative Learning. In Goodsell, A. S. (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: a sourcebook for higher education. University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K., and Cripps Clark, J. 2008. Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the primary-secondary school transition. Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Nelson, K., Kift, S., and Clarke, J. (2012). A transition pedagogy for student engagement and first-year learning, success and retention. In I. Solomonides, A. Reid & P. Petocz (Eds.), Engaging with learning in higher education (pp. 117--144). Faringdon, United Kingdom: Libri.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zimbardi, K., and Myatt, P. 2014. Embedding undergraduate research experiences within the curriculum: A cross-disciplinary study of the key characteristics guiding implementation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 233--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Moran, E., and Gonyea T. 2003. The influence of academically-focused peer interaction on college students' development. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478773.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Umbach, P. and Wawrzynski M. 2005. Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153--84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Krause, K. and Coates H. 2008. Students' engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493--505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698892.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zepke, N., and Leach L. 2010. Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167--77. http:://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379680.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mahoney, J. L., and Cairns B. 1997. Do extracurricular activities protect against early school dropout? Developmental Psychology, 33(2), 241--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fredricks, J. A., and Eccles, J. S. 2006. Is extracurricular participation associated with beneficial outcomes? Concurrent and Longitudinal relations. Developmental Psychology, 42(4), 698--713.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bloomfield, C. J., and Barber, B. L. 2009. Brief report: Performing on the stage, the field, or both? Australian adolescent extracurricular activity participation and self-concept. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 733--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Tang Su-Kit, Tse R., and Lam C.U. 2019. A new method of visualizing the road traffic: differential timing method, Proc. SPIE 11179, Eleventh International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP 2019), 111792S (14 August 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2539700.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhong J., Tse R., Marfia G., and Pau G. 2019. Fashion popularity analysis based on online social network via deep learning, Proc. SPIE 11179, Eleventh International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP 2019), 1117938 (14 August 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2539771.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tang S. K., Tse R., Song I. M. 2019. The smart green tool for the government: The electronic vehicle identification in management of public bus services, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Volume Part F148155, 2019, Pages 254--258. 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV 2019; Melbourne; Australia; 3 April 2019 through 5 April 2019; Code 148155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tse, R., Zhang, L. F., Lei, P., and Pau, G. 2017. Social Network Based Crowd Sensing for Intelligent Transportation and Climate Applications. Mobile Networks and Applications, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Tang, S.K., and Lei, I.S. 2016. Green Smart City: Public Transport Management Using Bluetooth. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovation for Connected World and Smart Living (ICICS 2016)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Tse, R., Lei, P., Lam, C.T., and Pau, G. 2016. A Visualized Exploration in Urban Sensing of Air Quality with Vehicular Sensors. Advances in Engineering Research (AER), volume 116, pages 522--527, March 2017, ISSN: 2352-5401.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tse, R., and Xiao, Y. 2016. A portable Wireless Sensor Network system for real-time environmental monitoring. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE 17th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM) (pp. 1--6).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Wong, A.K.Y., Cheok, S.M. and Tang, S.K. 2016. A User-Friendly Voting and Quiz System for Classroom Use with Connected Devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics China (ICCE-China 2016). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Wong, A. K. Y. and Cheang, K. C. 2015. Fast Prototyping Internet of Things Using .NET Gadgeteer. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wong, A. K. Y., Wong C. Y. and Tang S. K. 2015. Empirical Analysis of the Performance of Sites with IPv6 and IPv4 Capacities. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE-China 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Luo P. and Tse R. 2014. Research Experience of Big Data Analytics: The Tools for Government - a Case using Social Network in Mining Preferences of Tourists, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pages 312--315, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tse and Xiao 2016. An environment monitor, Chinese patent (ZL 2016 2 0316990.4) - utility model patent, Publication date: Aug 24, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tse and Xiao 2018. Environment monitoring method and device based on environment monitoring instrument, Chinese patent (ZL 201610191927.7), Publication date: August 3, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tse, Wang, Im, and Tang. 2019. Method for identifying number of people based on thermal energy estimation, computer device and computer readable storage medium, Chinese patent (201910893587.6), Application Date: Sept 20, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Luo, Y.L., Lei, P., & Tse R. 2015. Evaluating Macao's Gaming Industry using Sentiment Analysis on Weibo Tweets. In Proceedings of the 2015 2nd International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia (pp. 139--144). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing Computing Curriculum with Collaborative Engagement Model to Enrich Undergraduate Research Experience

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEIT 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology
      February 2020
      268 pages
      ISBN:9781450375085
      DOI:10.1145/3383923

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 April 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader