skip to main content
10.1145/3384657.3384780acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Accelerating Skill Acquisition of Two-Handed Drumming using Pneumatic Artificial Muscles

Published:06 June 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

While computers excel at augmenting user's cognitive abilities, only recently we started utilizing their full potential to enhance our physical abilities. More and more wearable force-feedback devices have been developed based on exoskeletons, electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) or pneumatic actuators. The latter, pneumatic-based artificial muscles, are of particular interest since they strike an interesting balance: lighter than exoskeletons and more precise than EMS. However, the promise of using artificial muscles to actually support skill acquisition and training users is still lacking empirical validation.

In this paper, we unveil how pneumatic artificial muscles impact skill acquisition, using two-handed drumming as an example use case. To understand this, we conducted a user study comparing participants' drumming performance after training with the audio or with our artificial-muscle setup. Our haptic system is comprised of four pneumatic muscles and is capable of actuating the user's forearm to drum accurately up to 80 bpm. We show that pneumatic muscles improve participants' correct recall of drumming patterns significantly when compared to auditory training.

References

  1. Massimo Cenciarini and Aaron M Dollar. 2011. Biomechanical considerations in the design of lower limb exoskeletons. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Frank Daerden and Dirk Lefeber. 2002. Pneumatic artificial muscles: actuators for robotics and automation. European journal of mechanical and environmental engineering 47, 1 (2002), 11--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Swagata Das, Yusuke Kishishita, Toshio Tsuji, Cassie Lowell, Kazunori Ogawa, and Yuichi Kurita. 2018. ForceHand glove: a wearable force-feedback glove with pneumatic artificial muscles (PAMs). IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3, 3 (2018), 2416--2423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. David Feygin, Madeleine Keehner, and R Tendick. 2002. Haptic guidance: Experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill. In Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002. IEEE, 40--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Katsuya Fujii, Sophia S Russo, Pattie Maes, and Jun Rekimoto. 2015. MoveMe: 3D haptic support for a musical instrument. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. ACM, 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shinya Fujii, Kazutoshi Kudo, Tatsuyuki Ohtsuki, and Shingo Oda. 2009. Tapping performance and underlying wrist muscle activity of non-drummers, drummers, and the world's fastest drummer. Neuroscience letters 459, 2 (2009), 69--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Shinya Fujii, Kazutoshi Kudo, Masahiro Shinya, Tatsuyuki Ohtsuki, and Shingo Oda. 2009. Wrist muscle activity during rapid unimanual tapping with a drumstick in drummers and nondrummers. Motor Control 13, 3 (2009), 237--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Shinya Fujii and Shingo Oda. 2006. Tapping speed asymmetry in drummers for single-hand tapping with a stick. Perceptual and motor skills 103, 1 (2006), 265--272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashraf S Gorgey. 2018. Robotic exoskeletons: The current pros and cons. World journal of orthopedics 9, 9 (2018), 112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Takashi Goto, Swagata Das, Yuichi Kurita, and Kai Kunze. 2018. Artificial Motion Guidance: an Intuitive Device based on Pneumatic Gel Muscle (PGM). In The 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology Adjunct Proceedings. ACM, 182--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Xiaochi Gu, Yifei Zhang, Weize Sun, Yuanzhe Bian, Dao Zhou, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2016. Dexmo: An Inexpensive and Lightweight Mechanical Exoskeleton for Motion Capture and Force Feedback in VR. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1991-1995. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858487Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mark A Guadagnoli and Timothy D Lee. 2004. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of motor behavior 36, 2 (2004), 212--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yasuhisa Hasegawa, Yasuyuki Mikami, Kosuke Watanabe, and Yoshiyuki Sankai. 2008. Five-fingered assistive hand with mechanical compliance of human finger. In 2008 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 718--724.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ai Higuchi, Junichiro Shiraishi, Yuichi Kurita, Evgeniia Shchelkanova, Yosuke Ikeda, and Tomohiro Shibata. 2019. Gait Evaluation on Parkinson's Disease Patients Using Spontaneous Stimulus Induced by UPS-PD. In 2019 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII). IEEE, 412--416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Simon Holland, Anders J Bouwer, Mathew Dalgelish, and Topi M Hurtig. 2010. Feeling the beat where it counts: fostering multi-limb rhythm skills with the haptic drum kit. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction. ACM, 21--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Yusuke Kishishita, Swagata Das, Antonio Vega Ramirez, Chetan Thakur, Ramin Tadayon, and Yuichi Kurita. 2019. Muscleblazer: Force-Feedback Suit for Immersive Experience. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 1813--1818.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. John W Krakauer and Reza Shadmehr. 2006. Consolidation of motor memory. Trends in neurosciences 29, 1 (2006), 58--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Simon P Landry and François Champoux. 2017. Musicians react faster and are better multisensory integrators. Brain and cognition 111 (2017), 156--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaebong Lee and Seungmoon Choi. 2010. Effects of haptic guidance and disturbance on motor learning: Potential advantage of haptic disturbance. In 2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium. IEEE, 335--342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ting Liu and Jody L Jensen. 2009. Effectiveness of auditory and visual sensory feedback for children when learning a continuous motor task. Perceptual and motor skills 109, 3 (2009), 804--816.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pedro Lopes and Patrick Baudisch. 2013. Muscle-propelled force feedback: bringing force feedback to mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2577--2580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Pedro Lopes and Patrick Baudisch. 2017. Immense Power in a Tiny Package: Wearables Based on Electrical Muscle Stimulation. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 3 (2017), 12--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Pedro Lopes, Patrik Jonell, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Affordance++: allowing objects to communicate dynamic use. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2515--2524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Pedro Lopes, Sijing You, Lung-Pan Cheng, Sebastian Marwecki, and Patrick Baudisch. 2017. Providing haptics to walls & heavy objects in virtual reality by means of electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1471--1482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Pedro Lopes, Sijing You, Alexandra Ion, and Patrick Baudisch. 2018. Adding force feedback to mixed reality experiences and games using electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Laura Marchal-Crespo, Stephanie McHughen, Steven C Cramer, and David J Reinkensmeyer. 2010. The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task. Experimental brain research 201, 2 (2010), 209--220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Laura Marchal-Crespo, Peter Wolf, Nicolas Gerig, Georg Rauter, Lukas Jaeger, Heike Vallery, and Robert Riener. 2015. The role of skill level and motor task characteristics on the effectiveness of robotic training: first results. In 2015 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR). IEEE, 151--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Gary E. McPherson. 2000. Commitment and Practice: Key Ingredients for Achievement during the Early Stages of Learning a Musical Instrument. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 147 (2000), 122--127. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319399Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Dan Morris, Hong Tan, Federico Barbagli, Timothy Chang, and Kenneth Salisbury. 2007. Haptic feedback enhances force skill learning. In Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07). IEEE, 21--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kazunori Ogawa, Tomohiro Ikeda, and Yuichi Kurita. 2018. Unplugged Powered Suit for Superhuman Tennis. In 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics. IEEE, 361--364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kazunori Ogawa, Chetan Thakur, Tomohiro Ikeda, Toshio Tsuji, and Yuichi Kurita. 2017. Development of a pneumatic artificial muscle driven by low pressure and its application to the unplugged powered suit. Advanced Robotics 31, 21 (2017), 1135--1143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Richard Parncutt and Gary McPherson. 2002. The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Wataru Sakoda, Toshio Tsuji, and Yuichi Kurita. 2018. VR Training System of Step Timing for Baseball Batter Using Force Stimulus. In International AsiaHaptics conference. Springer, 321--326.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Alan W Salmoni, Richard A Schmidt, and Charles B Walter. 1984. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychological bulletin 95, 3 (1984), 355.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Richard A Schmidt, Douglas E Young, Stephan Swinnen, and Diane C Shapiro. 1989. Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15, 2 (1989), 352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. George Lawrence Stone. 2013. Stick control: for the snare drummer. Alfred Music.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Nobuhiro Takahashi, Hayato Takahashi, and Hideki Koike. 2019. Soft Exoskeleton Glove Enabling Force Feedback for Human-Like Finger Posture Control with 20 Degrees of Freedom. In 2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC). IEEE, 217--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Emi Tamaki, Takashi Miyaki, and Jun Rekimoto. 2011. Possessed Hand: techniques for controlling human hands using electrical muscles stimuli. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 543--552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Chetan Thakur, Kazunori Ogawa, Toshio Tsuji, and Yuichi Kurita. 2018. Soft wearable augmented walking suit with pneumatic gel muscles and stance phase detection system to assist gait. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3, 4 (2018), 4257--4264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Bertrand Tondu. 2012. Modelling of the McKibben artificial muscle: A review. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 23, 3 (2012), 225--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Eric van Breda, Stijn Verwulgen, Wim Saeys, Katja Wuyts, Thomas Peeters, and Steven Truijen. 2017. Vibrotactile feedback as a tool to improve motor learning and sports performance: a systematic review. BMJ open sport & exercise medicine 3, 1 (2017), e000216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Masataka Yamamoto, Yusuke Kishishita, Koji Shimatani, and Yuichi Kurita. 2019. Development of New Soft Wearable Balance Exercise Device Using Pneumatic Gel Muscles. Applied Sciences 9, 15 (2019), 3108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Adam B Zoss, Hami Kazerooni, and Andrew Chu. 2006. Biomechanical design of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). IEEE/ASME Transactions on mechatronics 11, 2 (2006), 128--138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Accelerating Skill Acquisition of Two-Handed Drumming using Pneumatic Artificial Muscles

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            AHs '20: Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference
            March 2020
            296 pages
            ISBN:9781450376037
            DOI:10.1145/3384657

            Copyright © 2020 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 6 June 2020

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader