skip to main content
10.1145/3386164.3389087acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiscsicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Multi-Radar Track Fusion Methodology Based on Random Forest Regression

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 June 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces a multi-radar track fusion method based on random forest regression and provides an accurate and stable fusion track. The increasing number of aircraft will lead to congested routes, further leading to safety issues. Therefore, an effective track fusion method can accurately locate the aircraft, thereby ensuring the safety of the aircraft in the case of crowded routes. The basic idea of the method proposed in this paper is to select the radar data of a certain track of a certain day to train the model, and predict the position of the aircraft on the next day of the track through the trained model. As a traditional track fusion algorithm, the Kalman filtering has the problem of requiring accurate error estimation, insensitivity to noise, and long calculation time in the case of large data volume. The neural network method that compensates for these shortcomings also has the disadvantage of poor generalization ability in the case of a large amount of noise.

The random forest regression model proposed in this paper can overcome the shortcomings of over-fitting in neural network, so it can achieve better prediction results. And through the real data test, the average error is 40m, compared with the neural network method, the result is increased by 50%.

References

  1. Liaw, M. Wiener (2002). Classification and regression by random forest. R News, 2(3), 18--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, B. Syd (2016). System specifications for developing an Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) monitoring system. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 15, 40--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. Alexander, D. Zikic, J. Zhang, et al. Image Quality Transfer via Random Forest Regression: Applications in Diffusion MRI[C]//International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. H. Yang, B. Yang, X. Wu, et al. 2018. Research and Prospect of Intellectualized Air Traffic Management Technology. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 50(4), 12--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Ferrante. A Kalman filter-based radar track data fusion algorithm applied to a select ICBM case[C]// IEEE Radar Conference. IEEE, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J.R. Quinlan (1986). Induction of Decision Trees. Machine Learning. 1(1), 81--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Breiman (2001), Random Forests, Machine Learning. 45(1), 5--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M.K. Iqbal, B. Anwer, S.M. Abbas. Multi-Radar Track Fusion: Making lives easier[M]. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. N. El-Sheimy, K.W. Chiang, A. Noureldin (2006). The Utilization of Artificial Neural Networks for Multisensor System Integration in Navigation and Positioning Instruments[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 55(5), 1606--1615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. N. Yadaiah, L. Singh, R.S. Bapi, et al. MultisensorData Fusion Using Neural Networks[C]// IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network. IEEE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. O. Mutanga, E. Adam, M.A. Cho (2012). High density biomass estimation for wetland vegetation using WorldView-2 imagery and random forest regression algorithm. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 18(1), 399--406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P. Dubath, L. Rimoldini, M. Süveges, et al (2011). Random forest automated supervised classification of Hipparcos periodic variable stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 414(3), 2602--2617.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. P. Xu, F. Jelinek. Using Random Forests in the Structured Language Model.[C]// International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. MIT Press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P.F. Smith, S. Ganesh, P. Liu (2013). A comparison of random forest regression and multiple linear regression for prediction in neuroscience[J]. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 220(1), 85--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. R. Toledo, D. Gruyer, A. Lambert. A theoretical Analysis of the Extended Kalman Filter for Data Fusion in Vehicular Positioning[C]// International Conference on Its Telecommunications. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Adusumilli, D. Bhatt, H. Wang, et al (2013). A low-cost INS/GPS integration methodology based on random forest regression. Expert Systems with Applications. 40(11), 4653--4659.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Liu, S. Dissanayake, S. Patel, et al (2014). Learning accurate and interpretable models based on regularized random forests regression. BMC Systems Biology. 8(3 Supplement), S5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S.J. Julier, J.K. Uhlmann. New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems[C]// Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition VI. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. V. Svetnik (2003). Random Forest: A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. 43(6), 1947--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Multi-Radar Track Fusion Methodology Based on Random Forest Regression

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ISCSIC 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Control
          September 2019
          397 pages
          ISBN:9781450376617
          DOI:10.1145/3386164

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 June 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          ISCSIC 2019 Paper Acceptance Rate77of152submissions,51%Overall Acceptance Rate192of401submissions,48%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader