skip to main content
10.1145/3386164.3389098acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiscsicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Procedural Animation of Aurora and its Optimization for Keyframe Animation

Published:06 June 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

There have been many studies regarding visual simulations that consider the characteristic movement of auroras. We have proposed a method of generating animation of auroras in the desired form and in the desired location visualized by the users. This study is based on the method proposed by Kojima et. al [5], in which shape control is performed comparatively easily through parameter adjustment. With this method, an artificial 2D distributed simulation of auroras, comprised of inflow points for charged particles flowing from space, has been produced. The curtain-shaped movement of auroras can be reproduced by applying a kinetic model using an electromagnetic field calculation and a fluid calculation within the simulation space. We can see that the reproduction of aurora-specific movement is dependent on the initial value of the current volume flowing from the various flow points. In this way, we attempted to control the shape of the desired aurora by controlling the current flow.

In this study, we extracted two frames from the live-captured aurora video, and, set the initial distribution and target distribution of the aurora by reproducing the respective aurora distributions in 3D. As the respective distributions feature flow limits of charged particles forming an aurora 100 km above the ground, and many aurora video images often capture the horizon, we set the camera position as the point of origin and calculated the world coordinates for the lowest section of the aurora. A genetic algorithm was used to optimize the current flows. We set the cost function as the difference between the electric potential of the target shape and the electric potential based on the simulation results for the coordinates of each flow point. In addition, the number of searched parameters were reduced, assuming that the current distribution flowing to each flow point changes along with the initial shape functionally by expanding this function in a Fourier series, General shape control made possible through optimization. In the future works, we aim to increase control accuracy and gain the ability to control complex shapes.

References

  1. Gerald J. Romick and A. E. Belon. 1967. The spatial variation of auroral luminosity-II determination of volume emission rate profiles. Planetary and Space Science 15, 11 (1967), 1695--1716.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Gladimir V. G. Baranoski, Jon G. Rokne, Peter Shirley, Trond S. Trondsen, and Rui Bastos. 2003. Simulating the aurora. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 14, 1 (2003), 43--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gladimir V. G. Baranoski, JustinWan, Jon G. Rokne, and Ian Bell. 2005. Simulating the dynamics of auroral phenomena. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 24, 1 (2005), 37--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Syun-Ichi Akasofu. 1964. The development of the auroral substorm. Planetary and Space Science 12, 4 (1964), 273--282.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Takafumi Kojima, Ryota Takeuchi, Tomokazu Ishikawa, Koji Mikami, Taichi Watanabe, Kakimoto Masanori, and Kunio Kondo. 2014. Visual Simulation of Aurora Taking into Account Dynamic Phenomena of Disconnections and Reconnections. Information Processing Society of Japan 55, 8 (aug 2014), 1886--1898.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Takashi Yamamoto. 2011. A numerical simulation for the omega band formation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 116, A2 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Takehiko Aso, Masaki Ejiri, Akira Urashima, Hiroshi Miyaoka, ke Steen, Urban Brändström, and Björn Gustavsson. 1998. First results of auroral tomography from ALIS-Japan multi-station observations in March, 1995. Earth, planets and space 50, 1 (1998), 81--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Procedural Animation of Aurora and its Optimization for Keyframe Animation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ISCSIC 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Control
        September 2019
        397 pages
        ISBN:9781450376617
        DOI:10.1145/3386164

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 June 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        ISCSIC 2019 Paper Acceptance Rate77of152submissions,51%Overall Acceptance Rate192of401submissions,48%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader