skip to main content
10.1145/3386164.3389105acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiscsicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Integrated Round Trip Path Dual Registers (RTPDR) Fault Detection

Published:06 June 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The numerous application of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) in every facet of today's world demands prompt detection and classification of faults. In this paper, an integrated round trip path dual registers (RTPDR) is presented which combines Round Trip Paths (RTP) and Dual Registers (DR) for detection and classification of node failure, node reboot and link failure diagnosis. Round trip path is adopted for nodes grouping and threshold monitoring. Detection and classification of faults are done by comparison of dual registers using each path traversed by a packet from the source node. Two different registers are kept and updated respectively depending on the path traversed by a packet to detect anomalous behaviors. The results from simulation in MATLAB demonstrates the proposed technique achieves better detection latency, false alarm rate and false positive rate when compared with existing protocols.

References

  1. Aznoli, F., & Navimipour, N. J. (2016). Deployment strategies in the wireless sensor networks: Systematic literature review, classification, and current trends. Wireless Personal Communications, pp. 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee, I., Chanak, P., Rahaman, H., & Samanta, T. (2014). Effective fault detection and routing scheme for wireless sensor networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 40(2), 291--306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chanak, P., Banerjee, I., & Sherratt, R. S. (2016). Mobile sink based fault diagnosis scheme for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Systems and Software, 119, 45--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chen, I. R., Speer, A. P., & Eltoweissy, M. (2011). Adaptive fault-tolerant QoS control algorithms for maximizing system lifetime of query-based wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 8(2), 161--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chessa, S., & Santi, P. (2002). Crash faults identification in wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 25(14), 1273--1282.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chouikhi, S., El Korbi, I., Ghamri-Doudane, Y., & Saidane, L. A. (2015). A survey on fault tolerance in small and large scale wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 69, 22--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dargie, W., & Poellabauer, C. (2010). Fundamentals of wireless sensor networks: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Duche, R. N., & Sarwade, N. P. (2012). Sensor node failure or malfunctioning detection in wireless sensor network. ACEEE Int. J. Commun, 3(1), 57--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Duche, R., & Sawade, N. (2016). Energy efficient fault tolerant sensor node failure detection in WSNS. International Journal of Engineering and Technology of Innovation, 6(3), 190--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hsin, C., & Liu, M. (2006). Self-monitoring of wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 29(4), 462--476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kuncoro, C. B. D. (2015). Miniature and low-power wireless sensor node platform: state of the art and current trends. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, 1(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, M. H., & Choi, Y. H. (2008). Fault detection of wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 31(14), 3469--3475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Panda, M., & Khilar, P. M. (2012, December). Distributed soft fault detection algorithm in wireless sensor networks using statistical test. In 2012 2nd IEEE International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (pp. 195--198). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Rehena, Z., Das, D., Roy, S., & Mukherjee, N. (2013, February). Handling area fault in multiple-sink wireless sensor networks. In Advance Computing Conference (IACC), 2013 IEEE 3rd International (pp. 458--464). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Shaikh, R. B., & Sayed, A. H. (2015). Sensor Node Failure Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. International Journal of Emerging Technology in Computer Science & Electronics (IJETCSE), 14(12), 72--74Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Shao, S., Guo, S., & Qiu, X. (2017). Distributed fault detection based on credibility and cooperation for WSNs in smart grids. Sensors, 17(5), 983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sohraby, K., Minoli, D., & Znati, T. (2007). Wireless sensor networks: technology, protocols, and applications. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Swain, R. R., Khilar, P. M., & Bhoi, S. K. (2018). Heterogeneous fault diagnosis for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 69, 15--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Zafar, A., Wajid, B., & Akram, B. A. (2015, December). A hybrid fault diagnosis architecture for wireless sensor networks. In Open Source Systems & Technologies (ICOSST), 2015 International Conference on (pp. 7--15). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Zhang, Z., Mehmood, A., Shu, L., Huo, Z., Zhang, Y., & Mukherjee, M. (2018). A survey on fault diagnosis in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 6, 11349--11364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Zhen, F., JingQi, F., & Wei, S. (2016, May). The gateway anomaly detection and diagnosis in WSNs. In 2016 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) (pp. 2401-2406). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Zidi, S., Moulahi, T., & Alaya, B. (2018). Fault detection in wireless sensor networks through SVM classifier. IEEE Sensors Journal, 18(1), 340--347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Zonouz, A. E., Xing, L., Vokkarane, V. M., & Sun, Y. L. (2014, January). A time-dependent link failure model for wireless sensor networks. In 2014 Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (pp. 1--7). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Integrated Round Trip Path Dual Registers (RTPDR) Fault Detection

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ISCSIC 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Control
      September 2019
      397 pages
      ISBN:9781450376617
      DOI:10.1145/3386164

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 June 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ISCSIC 2019 Paper Acceptance Rate77of152submissions,51%Overall Acceptance Rate192of401submissions,48%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader