skip to main content
10.1145/3386201.3386216acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfablearnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Getting it to Work: Exploring Student-Driven Problem Solving in Computational Making

Published:22 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents findings from a year-long after-school program that engages youth from local communities in computational making and community problem solving. Our goal is to understand how self-directed computational making activities contribute to shifts in students' self-efficacy and perception of themselves as people who can pursue careers in STEM. During the first, skill-building semester, our preliminary findings suggest that when youth have the opportunity to work through self-directed projects, they engage in a variety of strategies to set goals and work through challenges. We believe that this work contributes to a growing field-wide understanding of novice designers' problem scoping practices and their nuanced perceptions of challenge.

References

  1. Cynthia J Atman, Robin S Adams, Monica E Cardella, Jennifer Turns, Susan Mosborg, and Jason Saleem. 2007. Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of engineering education 96, 4 (2007), 359--379.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Angela Calabrese Barton and Edna Tan. 2018. A Longitudinal Study of Equity-Oriented STEM-Rich Making Among Youth From Historically Marginalized Communities. American Educational Research Journal 55, 4 (Aug 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jacquelynne S Eccles and Ming-Te Wang. 2016. What motivates females and males to pursue careers in mathematics and science? International Journal of Behavioral Development 40, 2 (2016), 100--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. TP Kruse. 2015. Youth social entrepreneurship advancing the field. Sundance Family Foundation.-Electronic data.-St. Paul (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Adam Maltese. 2018. MakEval: tools to evaluate maker programs with youth. (2018). http://www.adammaltese.com/content/makeval/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jennifer A Rode, Anne Weibert, Andrea Marshall, Konstantin Aal, Thomas von Rekowski, Houda El Mimouni, and Jennifer Booker. 2015. From computational thinking to computational making. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 239--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Vanessa Svihla and Richard Reeve. 2016. Facilitating problem framing in project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 10, 2 (2016), 10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sepehr Vakil. 2018. Ethics, Identity, and Political Vision: Toward a Justice-Centered Approach to Equity in Computer Science Education. Harvard Educational Review 88 (03 2018), 26--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shirin Vossoughi and Bronwyn Bevan. 2014. Making and tinkering: A review of the literature. National Research Council Committee on Out of School Time STEM (2014), 1--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Shirin Vossoughi, Paula K Hooper, and Meg Escudé. 2016. Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review 86, 2 (2016), 206--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. David Weintrop, Elham Beheshti, Michael Horn, Kai Orton, Kemi Jona, Laura Trouille, and Uri Wilensky. 2016. Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25, 1 (2016), 127--147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Getting it to Work: Exploring Student-Driven Problem Solving in Computational Making

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      FabLearn '20: Proceedings of the FabLearn 2020 - 9th Annual Conference on Maker Education
      April 2020
      139 pages
      ISBN:9781450375436
      DOI:10.1145/3386201

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 November 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate14of35submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader