skip to main content
10.1145/3386723.3387836acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Normality Test to Detect the Congestion in MANET by Using OLSR Protocol

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) considers as simple network that use the wireless communication between difference wireless devices named as nodes. MANET has many challenges in its functions due to absence of fixed infrastructure and autoconfiguration. Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) is proactive MANET routing protocol dedicated to the large network density. However it can be affected by the congestion that decrease its performance by losing packets, taking more delay to receive packets and also minimize the throughput of the protocol. In this paper, we propose new method reckons on Normality Test that applied in statistic domain to detect the congestion in OLSR protocol without any modification in the algorithm and without any other additional control messages. To detect the congestion in OLSR we use Shapiro_Wilk (W) method to analyze the results of Throughput following two scenarios that leads to the congestion.

References

  1. Dimitris Kanellopoulos, « Congestion control for MANETs: An overview », ICT Express 5, p. 77--83, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. T. Clausen et P. Jacquet, « Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) », 03-janv-2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Christian Lochert, Björn Scheuermann, et Martin Mauve, « A survey on congestion control for mobile ad hoc networks », Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing, vol. 7, no 5, p. 655--676, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Geetika Maheshwari, Mahesh Gour, et Umesh Kumar Chourasia, « A Survey on Congestion Control in MANET », international Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, vol. 5, no 2, p. 998--1001, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. S. SHAPIRO et M. B. WILK, « An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples) », Biometrika, vol. 52, no 3 and 4, p. 591, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Khuzairi Mohd Zaini, Adib M. Monzer Habbal, Fazli Azzali, Suhaidi Hassan, et Mohamad Rizal, « An Interaction between Congestion-Control Based Transport Protocols and Manet Routing Protocols », Journal of Computer Science, vol. 8, no 4, p. 468--473, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Vadivel et Murali Bhaskaran, « Adaptive reliable and congestion control routing protocol for MANET », Wireless Netw, vol. 23, no 3, p. 819--829, avr. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M.D. Sirajuddin, Ch. Rupa, et A. Prasad, « Advanced Congestion Control Techniques for MANET », Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 433, p. 271--279, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. GAVIN HOLLAND et NITIN VAIDYA, « Analysis of TCP Performance over Mobile Ad Hoc Networks », Wireless Networks, no 8, p. 275--288, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Karthikeyan Sundaresan, Vaidyanathan Anantharaman, Hung-Yun Hsieh, et Raghupathy Sivakumar, « ATP: A Reliable Transport Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks », IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, vol. 4, no 6, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Makoto Ikeda, Elis Kulla, Masahiro Hiyama, Leonard Barolli, Rozeta Miho, et Makoto Takizawa, « Congestion Control for Mul i-flow Traffic in Wireless Mobile Ad-hoc Networks », Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mamata Rath, Umesh Prasad Rout, Niharika Pujari, Surendra Kumar Nanda, et Sambhu Prasad Panda, « Congestion Control Mechanism for RealTime Traffic in Mobile Adhoc Networks », Computer Communication, Networking and Internet Security, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Xiaoqin Chen, Haley M. Jones, et A.D.S. Jayalath, « Congestion-Aware Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks », IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Xinhao Yang, Long Ge, et Zhiquan Wang, « F-ECN: A Loss Discrimination Based on Fuzzy Logic Control », Sixth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Soundararajan, S et R.S. Bhuvaneswaran, « Multipath Load Balancing & Rate Based Congestion Control for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANET) », Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications, Bangkok, Thailand, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Kopparty, S.V. Krishnamurthy, M. Faloutsos, et S.K. Tripathi, « Split TCP for mobile ad hoc networks », Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Thode HJ, Testing for normality. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. NSNAM homepage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Normality Test to Detect the Congestion in MANET by Using OLSR Protocol

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          NISS '20: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Networking, Information Systems & Security
          March 2020
          528 pages
          ISBN:9781450376341
          DOI:10.1145/3386723

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 May 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader