skip to main content
10.1145/3386762.3386764acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesieeaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Techno-economic Comparison of Technologies for Biogas Upgrading

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Biomethane from biogas is an alternative energy currently gained attention to be used as substitution for vehicle fossil fuels. Despite its outstanding properties in terms of flexibility in application and environmental friendliness when compared with other alternative energy, the main obstacle to the development of commercial biomethane production is the uncertain value of investment. This research reveals the pros and cons in terms of specific energy used in production of biomethane from biogas, specific production cost and the current investment cost of biogas upgrading techniques including pressurized water scrubbing, chemical scrubbing, cryogenic separation, pressure swing adsorption and membrane separation. It was found that the specific energy used in the production of biomethane from biogas varies in the range of 0.05 - 0.62 kWh/m3 biogas. Increasing production capacity, the investment cost decreases while the energy consumptions for all production techniques increases, except for cryogenic separation which remain constant. Comparison of the specific production cost and the price of fossil fuels shows that to make the production of biomethane from biogas economically worthwhile, a development for more efficient technology to reduce production costs is of paramount importance.

References

  1. Murphy, J. D., and Power, N. 2009. Technical and economic analysis of biogas production in Ireland utilising three different crop rotations. Appl. Energy. 86(1), 25--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Patterson, T., Dinsdale, R., and Esteves, S. 2008. Review of energy balances and emissions associated with biomass-based transport fuels relevant to the United Kingdom context. ENERG FUEL, 22(5), 3506--3512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Smyth, B. M., Murphy, J. D., and O'Brien, C. M. 2009. What is the energy balance of grass biomethane in Ireland and other temperate northern European climates?. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 13(9), 2349--2360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ryckebosch, E., Drouillon, M., and Vervaeren, H. 2011. Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass Bioenerg. 35(5), 1633--1645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Green, D. W., and Perry, R. H. 2008. Perry's chemical engineers' hand book (8th ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill Companies Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Petersson, A., and WeLLInGer, A. 2009. Biogas upgrading technologies--developments and innovations. IEA bioenergy, 20, 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Masebinu, S. O., Aboyade, A., and Muzenda, E. 2014. Enrichment of biogas for use as vehicular fuel: a review of the upgrading techniques. IJRCMCE. 1(1), 2349--1442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Muñoz, R., Meier, L., Diaz, I., and Jeison, D. 2015. A review on the state-of-the-art of physical/chemical and biological technologies for biogas upgrading. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio. 14(4), 727--759.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Yousef, A. M., Eldrainy, Y. A., El-Maghlany, W. M., and Attia, A. 2017. Biogas upgrading process via low-temperature CO2 liquefaction and separation. J Nat. Gas Sci. and Eng. 45, 812--824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Jonsson and J. Westman, "Cryogenic Biogas Upgrading Using Plate Heat Exchangers," Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sahota, S., Shah, G., Ghosh, P., Kapoor, R., Sengupta, S., Singh, P., ... and Thakur, I. S. 2018. Review of trends in biogas upgradation technologies and future perspectives. Bioresource Technol. Reports, 1, 79--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. F. Bauer, C. Hulteberg, T. Persson and D. Tamm, "Biogas upgrading - Review of commercial technologies," Svenskt Gastekniskt Center (SGC) AB, Malmö, Sweden, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Andriani, D., Wresta, A., Atmaja, T. D., and Saepudin, A. 2014. A review on optimization production and upgrading biogas through CO2 removal using various techniques. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 172(4), 1909--1928.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Barbera, E., Menegon, S., Banzato, D., D'Alpaos, C. and Bertucco, A. 2019. From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context. Renew. Energ. 135, 663--673.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Patterson, T., Esteves, S., Dinsdale, R. and Guwy, A. 2011. An evaluation of the policy and techno-economic factors affecting the potential for biogas upgrading for transport fuel use in the UK. Energ. Policy, 39(3), 1806--1816.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Valenti, G., Arcidiacono, A., and Ruiz, J. A. N. 2016. Assessment of membrane plants for biogas upgrading to biomethane at zero methane emission. Biomass and Bioenerg. 85, 35--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Rotunno, P., Lanzini, A. and Leone, P. 2017. Energy and economic analysis of a water scrubbing based biogas upgrading process for biomethane injection into the gas grid or use as transportation fuel. Renew. Energ. 102, 417--432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sun, Q., Li, H., Yan, J., Liu, L., Yu, Z. and Yu, X. 2015. Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 51, 521--532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Paolini, V., Torre, M., Giacopini, W., Pastori, M., Segreto, M., Tomassetti, L., ... and Guerriero, E. 2019. CO2/CH4 separation by hot potassium carbonate absorption for biogas upgrading. Int. Greenh. Gas Con. 83, 186--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. De Hullu, J., Maassen, J. I. W., Van Meel, P. A., Shazad, S., Vaessen, J. M. P., Bini, L., and Reijenga, J. C. 2008. Comparing different biogas upgrading techniques. Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Diesel price, liter, 14 Oct 2019, visited website on 14 Oct 2019 https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/diesel_prices/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IEEA '20: Proceedings of the 2020 The 9th International Conference on Informatics, Environment, Energy and Applications
    March 2020
    138 pages
    ISBN:9781450376891
    DOI:10.1145/3386762

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 May 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader