ABSTRACT
Biomethane from biogas is an alternative energy currently gained attention to be used as substitution for vehicle fossil fuels. Despite its outstanding properties in terms of flexibility in application and environmental friendliness when compared with other alternative energy, the main obstacle to the development of commercial biomethane production is the uncertain value of investment. This research reveals the pros and cons in terms of specific energy used in production of biomethane from biogas, specific production cost and the current investment cost of biogas upgrading techniques including pressurized water scrubbing, chemical scrubbing, cryogenic separation, pressure swing adsorption and membrane separation. It was found that the specific energy used in the production of biomethane from biogas varies in the range of 0.05 - 0.62 kWh/m3 biogas. Increasing production capacity, the investment cost decreases while the energy consumptions for all production techniques increases, except for cryogenic separation which remain constant. Comparison of the specific production cost and the price of fossil fuels shows that to make the production of biomethane from biogas economically worthwhile, a development for more efficient technology to reduce production costs is of paramount importance.
- Murphy, J. D., and Power, N. 2009. Technical and economic analysis of biogas production in Ireland utilising three different crop rotations. Appl. Energy. 86(1), 25--36.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Patterson, T., Dinsdale, R., and Esteves, S. 2008. Review of energy balances and emissions associated with biomass-based transport fuels relevant to the United Kingdom context. ENERG FUEL, 22(5), 3506--3512.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smyth, B. M., Murphy, J. D., and O'Brien, C. M. 2009. What is the energy balance of grass biomethane in Ireland and other temperate northern European climates?. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 13(9), 2349--2360.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ryckebosch, E., Drouillon, M., and Vervaeren, H. 2011. Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass Bioenerg. 35(5), 1633--1645.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Green, D. W., and Perry, R. H. 2008. Perry's chemical engineers' hand book (8th ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill Companies Inc.Google Scholar
- Petersson, A., and WeLLInGer, A. 2009. Biogas upgrading technologies--developments and innovations. IEA bioenergy, 20, 1--19.Google Scholar
- Masebinu, S. O., Aboyade, A., and Muzenda, E. 2014. Enrichment of biogas for use as vehicular fuel: a review of the upgrading techniques. IJRCMCE. 1(1), 2349--1442.Google Scholar
- Muñoz, R., Meier, L., Diaz, I., and Jeison, D. 2015. A review on the state-of-the-art of physical/chemical and biological technologies for biogas upgrading. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio. 14(4), 727--759.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yousef, A. M., Eldrainy, Y. A., El-Maghlany, W. M., and Attia, A. 2017. Biogas upgrading process via low-temperature CO2 liquefaction and separation. J Nat. Gas Sci. and Eng. 45, 812--824.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Jonsson and J. Westman, "Cryogenic Biogas Upgrading Using Plate Heat Exchangers," Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden, 2011.Google Scholar
- Sahota, S., Shah, G., Ghosh, P., Kapoor, R., Sengupta, S., Singh, P., ... and Thakur, I. S. 2018. Review of trends in biogas upgradation technologies and future perspectives. Bioresource Technol. Reports, 1, 79--88.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Bauer, C. Hulteberg, T. Persson and D. Tamm, "Biogas upgrading - Review of commercial technologies," Svenskt Gastekniskt Center (SGC) AB, Malmö, Sweden, 2013.Google Scholar
- Andriani, D., Wresta, A., Atmaja, T. D., and Saepudin, A. 2014. A review on optimization production and upgrading biogas through CO2 removal using various techniques. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 172(4), 1909--1928.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barbera, E., Menegon, S., Banzato, D., D'Alpaos, C. and Bertucco, A. 2019. From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context. Renew. Energ. 135, 663--673.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Patterson, T., Esteves, S., Dinsdale, R. and Guwy, A. 2011. An evaluation of the policy and techno-economic factors affecting the potential for biogas upgrading for transport fuel use in the UK. Energ. Policy, 39(3), 1806--1816.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Valenti, G., Arcidiacono, A., and Ruiz, J. A. N. 2016. Assessment of membrane plants for biogas upgrading to biomethane at zero methane emission. Biomass and Bioenerg. 85, 35--47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rotunno, P., Lanzini, A. and Leone, P. 2017. Energy and economic analysis of a water scrubbing based biogas upgrading process for biomethane injection into the gas grid or use as transportation fuel. Renew. Energ. 102, 417--432.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sun, Q., Li, H., Yan, J., Liu, L., Yu, Z. and Yu, X. 2015. Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 51, 521--532.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paolini, V., Torre, M., Giacopini, W., Pastori, M., Segreto, M., Tomassetti, L., ... and Guerriero, E. 2019. CO2/CH4 separation by hot potassium carbonate absorption for biogas upgrading. Int. Greenh. Gas Con. 83, 186--194.Google ScholarCross Ref
- De Hullu, J., Maassen, J. I. W., Van Meel, P. A., Shazad, S., Vaessen, J. M. P., Bini, L., and Reijenga, J. C. 2008. Comparing different biogas upgrading techniques. Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Diesel price, liter, 14 Oct 2019, visited website on 14 Oct 2019 https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/diesel_prices/Google Scholar
Recommendations
The Effects of Different Anaerobic Fermentation Temperature on Biogas Fermentation of Swine Manure
CDCIEM '11: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Computer Distributed Control and Intelligent Environmental MonitoringBiogas yields and methane productivity were studied at different temperatures (15 æ, 20 æ, 25 æ, 30 æ and 35 æ) by the way of anaerobic fermentation experiment which takes wine manure as biogas fermentation raw material, and take the sediment from rural ...
Feasibility of Using Hypersaline Lake Sediment as Inoculum for Biogas Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Saline Wastewater
ICBBB '18: Proceedings of the 2018 8th International Conference on Bioscience, Biochemistry and BioinformaticsAnaerobic digestion processes have been widely used for biogas production from various substrates, however, without much attention to the saline effluents containing organic compounds. This study aims to investigate the use of hypersaline lake sediment ...
Introduction to a Large-Scale Biogas Plant in a Dairy Farm
ICDMA '10: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Digital Manufacturing & Automation - Volume 01This article describes a large-scale biogas plant in a dairy farm located in the Tongzhou District of Beijing. It is has a treatment capacity of 30t manure and 30t wastewater per day, a total of 60t/d with a residence time of 20 days. Input material ...
Comments