skip to main content
10.1145/3387168.3387240acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvispConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Phase Retrieval Method for Phase-shifting Interferometry with Machine Learning

Published:25 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Phase contrast imaging attracts attention in the biomedical field thanks to higher contrast than absorption contrast. However, the phase retrieval for phase-shifting interferometry (PSI) often involves the problems, e.g., the noise, stepping error and phase wrapping. In the conventional way, each issue had to be addressed individually. In this paper, we propose the machine learning based method, which uses the neural network and learns features in an end-to-end manner. The proposed method can resolve the noise, stepping error artifacts and phase wrapping, simultaneously. The results are shown by numerical simulation.

References

  1. A. L. Maas, A. Y. Hannun, and A. Y. Ng. 2013. Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. In ICML Workshop on Deep Learning for Audio, Speech and Language Processing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Momose, W. Yashiro, Y. Takeda, Y. Suzuki, and T. Hattori. 2006. Phase Tomography by X-ray Talbot Interferometry for Biological Imaging. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 45, 6A (2006), 5254--5262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. C. Dong, C. C. Loy, K. He, and X. Tang. 2014. Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networks. (2014), 1--14. arXiv:1501.00092Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Ledig, L. Theis, F. Huszar, J. Caballero, A. Cunningham, A. Acosta, Aitken, A. Tejani, J. Totz, Z. Wang, and W. Shi. 2016. Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network. (2016). arXiv:1609.04802Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Zhang, L. Zhong, H. Wang, J. Deng, J. Fan, and X. Lu. 2013. Phase shift extraction algorithm based on Euclidean matrix norm. Optics Letters 38, 9 (2013), 1506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba. 2014. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. (2014). arXiv:1412.6980Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. F. Pfeiffer, C. Kottler, O. Bunk, and C. David. 2007. Hard X-Ray Phase Tomography with Low-Brilliance Sources. Physical Review Letters 98, 10 (2007), 108105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. H. Y. H. Huang, L. Tian, Z. Zhang, Y. Liu, Z. Chen, and G. Barbastathis. 2012. Path-independent phase unwrapping using phase gradient and total-variation (TV) denoising. Optics Express 20, 13 (2012), 14075.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. Nagi, F. Ducatelle, G. A. Di Caro, D. Ciresan, U. Meier, A. Giusti, F. Nagi, J. Schmidhuber, and L. M. Gambardella. 2011. Max-pooling convolutional neural networks for vision-based hand gesture recognition. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications (ICSIPA). IEEE, 342--347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L. Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. 2009. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 248--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. Vargas, J. A. Quiroga, and T. Belenguer. 2011. Phase-shifting interferometry based on principal component analysis. Optics Letters 36, 8 (2011), 1326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. K. Zhang, W. Zuo, Y. Chen, D. Meng, and L. Zhang. 2016. Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoising. (2016). arXiv:1608.03981Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. K. Okada, A. Sato, and J. Tsujiuchi. 1991. Simultaneous calculation of phase distribution and scanning phase shift in phase shifting interferometry. Optics Communications 84, 3-4 (1991), 118--124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. L. Z. Cai, Q. Liu, and X. L. Yang. 2003. Phase-shift extraction and wavefront reconstruction in phase-shifting interferometry with arbitrary phase steps. Optics Letters 28, 19 (2003), 1808.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. A. Herráez, D. R. Burton, M. J. Lalor, and M. A. Gdeisat. 2002. Fast two-dimensional phase-unwrapping algorithm based on sorting by reliability following a noncontinuous path. Applied Optics 41, 35 (2002), 7437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Takeda, H. Ina, and S. Kobayashi. 1982. Fourier-transform method of fringe-pattern analysis for computer-based topography and interferometry. Journal of the Optical Society of America 72, 1 (1982), 156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox. 2015. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention -- MICCAI 2015. Springer International Publishing, 234--241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner. 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86, 11 (1998), 2278--2324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Y. Du, G. Feng, H. Li, J. Vargas, and S. Zhou. 2012. Spatial carrier phase-shifting algorithm based on principal component analysis method. Optics Express 20, 15 (2012), 16471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Z. Wang and B. Han. 2004. Advanced iterative algorithm for phase extraction of randomly phase-shifted interferograms. Optics Letters 29, 14 (2004), 1671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Phase Retrieval Method for Phase-shifting Interferometry with Machine Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICVISP 2019: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Vision, Image and Signal Processing
      August 2019
      584 pages
      ISBN:9781450376259
      DOI:10.1145/3387168

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 May 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ICVISP 2019 Paper Acceptance Rate126of277submissions,45%Overall Acceptance Rate186of424submissions,44%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader