skip to main content
10.1145/3387168.3387247acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvispConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improved algorithm for Phase Unwrapping with Continuous Submodular Minimization

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The phase unwrapping is the process of attempting to reconstruct the true phase from modulo 2π phase values. This procedure requires that we have an important congruent constraint i.e. rewrapping unwrapped image should be identical to the original wrapped image. This constraint condition causes a discrete optimization problem. However, many methods have ignored this constraint condition to solve a continuous minimization problem directly, making it difficult to solve the solution correctly. We recently presented new continuous minimum norm method that is based on the Lovász extension. Our method can reach the optimal solution with the congruent constraint condition. Note that in our work, we have taken the subgradient method for minimization, but it is time consuming. In this paper, we introduce the incremental subgradient method to the minimization procedure, which is faster than the subgradient method. To solve the phase unwrapping, first, we also use the Lovász extension to transform the phase unwrapping problem to equivalent continuous minimization problem which consists of the sum of large numbers of component functions. Then we take the incremental subgradient method to solve the minimization problem in which operate on a single component at each iteration, rather than on the entire cost function. On the other hand, we also introduce new minimal function to deal with high lever noise. Several simulations show, compared with the subgradient method, the new algorithm only takes one quarter of (or less) the numbers of iteration for the convergence.

References

  1. A. Nedić and D.P. Bertsekas, Incremental subgradient methods for nondifferentiable optimization, SIAM Journal on Optimization 56 (2001), no. 1, 109--138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bach, F. 2011. Learning with submodular functions: A convex optimization perspective. arXiv: 1111.6453 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bioucas-Dias, J. M., and Valadão, G. 2007. Phase unwrapping via graph cuts. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16(2007), 698--709.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Campbell, N. D. F., Vogiatzis, G., Hernández, C., and Cipolla, R. 2010. Automatic 3D object segmentation in multiple views using volumetric graph-cuts. Image and Vision Computing, 28(2010), 14--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dong, J., Chen, F., Zhou, D., Liu, T., Yu, Z., and Y. Wang. 2017. Phase unwrapping with graph cuts optimization and dual decomposition acceleration for 3D high-resolution MRI data. Magn Reson Med 77(2017), 1353--1358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Flynn, T. 1997. Two-dimensional phase unwrapping with minimum weighted discontinuity. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A. 14(1997), 2692--2701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ghiglia, D., and Pritt, M. 1998. Two-Dimensional Phase Unwrapping. Theory, Algorithms, and Software (New York: Wiley, 1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang, Howard Y. H., Tian, L., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Chen, Z., and Barbastathis, G. 2012. Path-independent phase unwrapping using phase gradient and total-variation(TV) denoising. Opt. Express. 20(2012), 14075--14089.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Itoh, K. 1982. Analysis of the phase unwrapping problem. Appl. Opt. 21(1982), 2470--2470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jezzard, P., and Balaban, R. S. 1995. Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B_0 field variations. Magnetic Resonance in medicine. 34(1995) 65--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kudo, H., Lian, S., Wada, K., Two-Dimensional Phase Unwrapping with Continuous Submodular Minimization. In Proc. the 2018 International Conference on Digital Medicine and Image Processing, 6--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Loecher, M., Schrauben, E., Johnson, K., and Wieben, O. 2016. Phase unwrapping in 4D MR Flow with a 4D single-step Laolacian Algorithm. Journal of Magneloechertic Resonance Imajing. 43(2016), 833--842.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lovász, L. 1983. Submodular functions and convexity. In Mathematical programming: The state of the art, A. Bachem, M. Grötschel, and B. Korte, eds., (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983), 235--257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal. D., and Malik, J. 2001. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. 2(2001), 416--423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Massonnet, D., and Feigl, K. L. 1998. Radar interferometry and its application to changes in the earth's surface. Rev. Geophys. 36(1998), 441--500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Pfeiffer, F., Weitkamp, T., Oliver, B., Christian, D. 2006. Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources. Nature Phys. 2(2006), 258--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Rosen, P. A., Hensley, S., Joughin, I. R., Li, F. K., Madsen, S. N., Rodriguez, E., and Goldstein, R. 2000. Synthetic aperture radar interferometry. Proc. IEEE. 88(2000), 333--382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Weitkamp, T., Diaz, A., David, C., Christian, D., Pfeiffer, F., Stampanoni, M., Cloetens, P., Ziegler, E. 2005. Quantitative X-ray phase imaging with a grating interferometer. Opt. Express. 13(2005), 6296--6304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ying L. Phase unwrapping. In: M Akay, editor. Wiley encyclopedia of biomedical engineering. 1st Ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Improved algorithm for Phase Unwrapping with Continuous Submodular Minimization

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICVISP 2019: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Vision, Image and Signal Processing
        August 2019
        584 pages
        ISBN:9781450376259
        DOI:10.1145/3387168

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 May 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        ICVISP 2019 Paper Acceptance Rate126of277submissions,45%Overall Acceptance Rate186of424submissions,44%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader