skip to main content
10.1145/3387902.3392626acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Artifacts Available

Application-specific network-on-chip design space exploration framework for neuromorphic processor

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Neuromorphic processors can support the design of various Spiking Neural Networks (SNN) to deal with different tasks, such as recognition and tracking. Neuromorphic processors use Network-on-Chip (NoC) to support communication between neurons in SNN. The different SNN has different communication traffic patterns. It will pose the different challenges of the NoC designing. A reasonable NoC architecture can improve the overall performance such as lower latency of the processor. Hence, it is critical to implement the exploration of NoC architecture design for neuromorphic processors.

This paper proposes a rapid NoC design space exploration (DSE) framework. As to our knowledge, it is the first work for the NoC DSE for the neuromorphic processor. The framework takes the spikes of the SNN application as input. It can support multiple optimization objectives for NoC design. Meanwhile, an optimized simulated annealing algorithm has been used to perform the DSE for the NoC design space. Then it outputs the final NoC design configuration. We apply this framework to 7 SNN applications to perform the NoC DSE. Compared with baseline NoC configuration, the NoC DSE framework can improve performance (Average Transport latency) by 54% to 93%. Compared with the Simulated Annealing (SA) algorithm, the Better-History SA (BHSA) algorithm speeds up the searching process by 1.5 to 8 times.

References

  1. Filipp Akopyan, Jun Sawada, Andrew Cassidy, Rodrigo Alvarez-Icaza, John Arthur, Paul Merolla, Nabil Imam, Yutaka Nakamura, Pallab Datta, Gi-Joon Nam, et al. 2015. Truenorth: Design and tool flow of a 65 mw 1 million neuron programmable neurosynaptic chip. IEEE transactions on computer-aided design of integrated circuits and systems 34, 10 (2015), 1537--1557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Edith Beigné, Fabien Clermidy, Pascal Vivet, Alain Clouard, and Marc Renaudin. 2005. An asynchronous NOC architecture providing low latency service and its multi-level design framework. In 11th IEEE International Symposium on Asynchronous Circuits and Systems. IEEE, 54--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Michael Beyeler, Kristofor D Carlson, Ting-Shuo Chou, Nikil Dutt, and Jeffrey L Krichmar. 2015. CARLsim 3: A user-friendly and highly optimized library for the creation of neurobiologically detailed spiking neural networks. In 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Mike Davies, Narayan Srinivasa, Tsung-Han Lin, Gautham Chinya, Yongqiang Cao, Sri Harsha Choday, Georgios Dimou, Prasad Joshi, Nabil Imam, Shweta Jain, et al. 2018. Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning. IEEE Micro 38, 1 (2018), 82--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Haowen Fang, Amar Shrestha, De Ma, and Qinru Qiu. 2018. Scalable noc-based neuromorphic hardware learning and inference. In 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Steve B Furber, David R Lester, Luis A Plana, Jim D Garside, Eustace Painkras, Steve Temple, and Andrew D Brown. 2012. Overview of the spinnaker system architecture. IEEE Trans. Comput. 62, 12 (2012), 2454--2467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Shasha Guo, Lei Wang, Shuquan Wang, Yu Deng, Zhijie Yang, Shiming Li, Zhige Xie, and Qiang Dou. 2019. A Systolic SNN Inference Accelerator and its Co-optimized Software Framework. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI. 63--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Eugene M Izhikevich. 2003. Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Transactions on neural networks 14, 6 (2003), 1569--1572. https://doi.org/document/1257420Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Z Jackson. 2016. Free Spoken Digit Dataset (fsdd). Technical Report. Technical report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nan Jiang, George Michelogiannakis, Daniel Becker, Brian Towles, and William J Dally. 2010. Booksim 2.0 user's guide. Standford University (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Michel A Kinsy, Michael Pellauer, and Srinivas Devadas. 2013. Heracles: a tool for fast RTL-based design space exploration of multicore processors. In Proceedings of the ACM/SIGDA international symposium on Field programmable gate arrays. 125--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Shashi Kumar, Axel Jantsch, J-P Soininen, Martti Forsell, Mikael Millberg, Johny Oberg, Kari Tiensyrja, and Ahmed Hemani. 2002. A network on chip architecture and design methodology. In Proceedings IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI. New Paradigms for VLSI Systems Design. ISVLSI 2002. IEEE, 117--124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Markos Kynigos, Javier Navaridas, Luis A Plana, and Steve Furber. 2018. Network-on-chip evaluation for a novel neural architecture. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers. 216--219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yann LeCun, Léon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio, and Patrick Haffner. 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86, 11 (1998), 2278--2324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Shiming Li, Shasha Guo, Limeng Zhang, Ziyang Kang, Shiying Wang, Wei Shi, Lei Wang, and Weixia Xu. 2020. SNEAP: A Fast and Efficient Toolchain for Mapping Large-Scale Spiking Neural Network onto NoC-based Neuromorphic Platform. In Proceedings of the 2020 on Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI. to be published.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Carver Mead. 1990. Neuromorphic electronic systems. Proc. IEEE 78, 10 (1990), 1629--1636.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Deep Medhi and Karthik Ramasamy. 2017. Network routing: algorithms, protocols, and architectures. Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Saber Moradi, Ning Qiao, Fabio Stefanini, and Giacomo Indiveri. 2017. A scalable multicore architecture with heterogeneous memory structures for dynamic neuromorphic asynchronous processors (DYNAPs). IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems 12, 1 (2017), 106--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Garrick Orchard, Ajinkya Jayawant, Gregory K Cohen, and Nitish Thakor. 2015. Converting static image datasets to spiking neuromorphic datasets using saccades. Frontiers in neuroscience 9 (2015), 437.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Partha Pratim Pande, Cristian Grecu, Michael Jones, Andre Ivanov, and Resve Saleh. 2005. Performance evaluation and design trade-offs for network-on-chip interconnect architectures. IEEE transactions on Computers 54, 8 (2005), 1025--1040.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jing Pei, Lei Deng, Sen Song, Mingguo Zhao, Youhui Zhang, Shuang Wu, Guanrui Wang, Zhe Zou, Zhenzhi Wu, Wei He, et al. 2019. Towards artificial general intelligence with hybrid Tianjic chip architecture. Nature 572, 7767 (2019), 106--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Johannes Schemmel, Andreas Grübl, Stephan Hartmann, Alexander Kononov, Christian Mayr, Karlheinz Meier, Sebastian Millner, Johannes Partzsch, Stefan Schiefer, Stefan Scholze, et al. 2012. Live demonstration: A scaled-down version of the brainscales wafer-scale neuromorphic system. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. IEEE, 702--702.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Benjamin Schrauwen, David Verstraeten, and Jan Van Campenhout. 2007. An overview of reservoir computing: theory, applications and implementations. In Proceedings of the 15th european symposium on artificial neural networks. p. 471--482 2007. 471--482.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Cristina Silvano, William Fornaciari, Gianluca Palermo, Vittorio Zaccaria, Fabrizio Castro, Marcos Martinez, Sara Bocchio, Roberto Zafalon, Prabhat Avasare, Geert Vanmeerbeeck, et al. 2011. Multicube: Multi-objective design space exploration of multi-core architectures. In VLSI 2010 Annual Symposium. Springer, 47--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Marcel Stimberg, Romain Brette, and Dan FM Goodman. 2019. Brian 2, an intuitive and efficient neural simulator. Elife 8 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Lei Wang, YuXing Tang, Yu Deng, Fangyan Qin, Qiang Dou, Guangda Zhang, and Feipeng Zhang. 2015. A Scalable and fast microprocessor design space exploration methodology. In 2015 IEEE 9th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip. IEEE, 33--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Qian Wang, Yingyezhe Jin, and Peng Li. 2015. General-purpose LSM learning processor architecture and theoretically guided design space exploration. In 2015 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS). IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Qian Wang, Yongtae Kim, and Peng Li. 2014. Architectural design exploration for neuromorphic processors with memristive synapses. In 14th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology. IEEE, 962--966.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Application-specific network-on-chip design space exploration framework for neuromorphic processor

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CF '20: Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers
        May 2020
        298 pages
        ISBN:9781450379564
        DOI:10.1145/3387902

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 May 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate240of680submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        CF '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader