skip to main content
10.1145/3388176.3388209acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Systematization of Digital Twins: Ontology and Conceptual Framework

Published: 20 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The development and progress in information and communication technologies will transform traditional products into smart products and allow to offer novel smart services [1]. Herein, the digital twin (DT) concept is regarded as a key technology to create value with smart services [2]. Although the research and applications of DTs emerge continuously many concerns are to be scrutinized [3]. The lack of a shared conceptual framework for DTs with an unambiguous terminology [4] complicates cross-functional discussions. Therefore, a systematization of the main dimensions of DTs is proposed in the form of an ontology and a conceptual framework thereof derived. The research questions addressed in this paper are a) «Which dimensions are used to classify and structure DTs in academic literature?», b) «What are the fundamental differences or specifications within these dimensions?» and c) «How do these different specifications relate to each other?» The focus of the research is on the objective to find classification systematics that are a) representing the entire spectrum of DTs, b) universally valid in all DT related domains and c) applicable in research and practice. A systematic literature review on the relevant aspects of DTs was conducted and the findings iteratively advanced within workshop sessions with academic experts. DTs are considered as integrators of physical and digital worlds as well as internal and external value creation. Further, the creation of DTs requires per definition the use of digital data. Hence, the proposed ontology and conceptual framework for DTs include the following main dimensions to consider for every DT: Data resources, external value creation and internal value creation. The main subdimensions of the data resources are the data sources to obtain the data, the data categories and the data formats. The main subdimension of the external value creation are the attributes of the services as the basis of the value propositions, the level of smartness of the connected products and the actors on the different levels of the ecosystem. The main subdimensions of the internal value creation are the lifecycle phases of products, the product management levels and the different generations of both. The proposed ontology and conceptual framework support researchers and practitioners in positioning and structuring their intended DT activities and communicating them to internal and external stakeholders. The holistic view on the data resource dimension further allows to easily deduct the needed data for certain applications or deduct possible applications from already available data.

References

[1]
Dawid, H., Decker, R., Hermann, T., Jahnke, H., Klat, W., König, R., & Stummer, C. (2016). Management science in the era of smart consumer products: challenges and research perspectives. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 25(1), 203--230.
[2]
Barbieri, C., West, S., Rapaccini, M. & Meierhofer, J. (2019). Are practitioners and literature aligned about digital twin? 26th EurOMA Conference Operations Adding Value to Society. Conference Paper.
[3]
Zheng, Y., Yang, S., & Cheng, H. (2018). An application framework of digital twin and its case study. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(3), 1141--1153.
[4]
Schleich, B., Anwer, N., Mathieu, L., & Wartzack, S. (2017). Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 141--144.
[5]
Porter, M. W. & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review 92: 64--88.
[6]
Porter, M. W. & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015). How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review 93: 97--114.
[7]
Wuenderlich, N. V., Heinonen, K., Ostrom, A. L., Patricio, L., Sousa, R., Voss, C., & Lemmink, J. G. A. M. (2015). "Futurizing" smart service: implications for service researchers and managers. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(6/7), 442--447.
[8]
Grieves, M. (2014). Digital twin: Manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication, White Paper.
[9]
Tao, F., Zhang, M. & Nee, A.Y.C. (2019). Digital twin driven smart manufacturing. First Edition. United Kingdom, London Wall: Elsevier Inc.
[10]
E. Glaessgen & D. Stargel (2012): "The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and U.S. Air Force vehicles," in Proc. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct. Struct. Dyn. Mater. Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1818
[11]
Detzner, A., & Eigner, M. (2018). A digital twin for root cause analysis and product quality monitoring. Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, 1547-1558.
[12]
Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2016). Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, 85--113.
[13]
Landahl, J., Panarotto, M., Johannesson, H. Isaksson, O. & Lööf, J. (2018). Towards Adopting Digital Twins to Support Design Reuse during Platform Concept Development. NordDesign 2018 August 14-17, 2018 Linköping, Sweden.
[14]
Qi, Q., Tao, F., Zuo, Y., & Zhao, D. (2018). Digital Twin Service towards Smart Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 72, 237--242.
[15]
Shangguan, D., Chen, L., & Ding, J. (2019). A Hierarchical Digital Twin Model Framework for Dynamic Cyber-Physical System Design. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering - ICMRE'19.
[16]
Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Zhang, H., & Sui, F. (2017). Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(9-12), 3563--3576.
[17]
Tao, F., Sui, F., Liu, A., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Song, B., Guo, Z., Lu, S.C., & Nee, A.Y. (2019). Digital twin-driven product design framework.
[18]
Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A.Y. (2019). Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15, 2405-2415.
[19]
Uhlenkamp, J.-F., Hribernik, K., Wellsandt, S., & Thoben, K.-D. (2019). Digital Twin Applications: A first systemization of their dimensions. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC).
[20]
Panetta, K., (2018). Gartner Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2019. Published online October 15, 2018. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/gartner-top-10-strategic-technology-trends-for-2019/ Accessed 12 August 2019.
[21]
Rais, A. (2019). Growth of the digital twin market. Published online August 2, 2019. https://www.maschinenmarkt.international/growth-of-the-digital-twin-market-a-851571/ Accessed 12 August 2019.
[22]
Voell, C., Chatterjee, P., Rauch, A., & Golovatchev, J. (2018). How Digital Twins Enable the Next Level of PLM -- A Guide for the Concept and the Implementation in the Internet of Everything Era. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 238--249.
[23]
Lee, J., Kao, H.-A., & Yang, S. (2014). Service Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment. Procedia CIRP, 16, 3--8.
[24]
Rosen, R., von Wichert, G., Lo, G., & Bettenhausen, K. D. (2015). About The Importance of Autonomy and Digital Twins for the Future of Manufacturing. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 567--572.
[25]
Nyffenegger, F., Hänggi, R., & Reisch, A. (2018). A Reference Model for PLM in the Area of Digitization. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 358--366.
[26]
Tomiyama, T., Lutters, E., Stark, R., & Abramovici, M. (2019). Development capabilities for smart products. CIRP Annals, 68(2), 727--750.
[27]
Meierhofer, J. & West, S. (2019). Service value creation using a digital twin. Conference Paper. 2019 Naples Forum on Service. Italy.
[28]
Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R. & Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the Giant: On the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Literature Search Process, ECIS, 2206--2217.
[29]
Cooper, H.M. (1988). Organizing Knowledge Syntheses: A Taxonomy of Literature Reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1: 104--126.
[30]
Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J. and Wang, L. (2006). Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science, Biomedical Digital Libraries, Vol. 3 No. 7.
[31]
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338--342.
[32]
Elsevier (2019). About Scopus, https://blog.scopus.com/about (Accessed: 09.08.2017).
[33]
Rymaszewska, A., Helo, P. & Gunasekaran, A. (2017), "IoT powered servitization of manufacturing -- an exploratory case study", International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, Vol. 192, pp. 92--105.
[34]
Holler, M., Uebernickel, F. & Brenner, W. (2016): Digital Twin Concepts in Manufacturing Industries - A Literature Review and Avenues for Further Research. 2016. - 18th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (IJIE). -Seoul, Korea.
[35]
Dreyer, S., Olivotti, D., Lebek, B., & Breitner, M.H. (2017). Towards a Smart Services Enabling Information Architecture for Installed Base Management in Manufacturing. Wirtschaftsinformatik.
[36]
Damjanovic-Behrendt, V., & Behrendt, W. (2019). An open source approach to the design and implementation of Digital Twins for Smart Manufacturing. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 32(4-5), 366--384.
[37]
Malakuti, S., Goldschmidt, T., & Koziolek, H. (2018). A Catalogue of Architectural Decisions for Designing IIoT Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 103--111.
[38]
Wuest, T., Hribernik, K., & Thoben, K.-D. (2015). Accessing servitisation potential of PLM data by applying the product avatar concept. Production Planning & Control, 26(14-15), 1198--1218.
[39]
Fuchs, R. & Barth, L. (2018). Wie Smart Connected Products Kunden emotionalisieren. In: Rueger, et al. (2018): Emotionalisierung im digitalen Marketing: Erfolgreiche Methoden für die Marketingpraxis, 89--103.
[40]
Longo, F., Nicoletti, L. & Padovano, A. (2019): Ubiquitous knowledge empowers the Smart Factory: The impacts of a Service-oriented Digital Twin on enterprises' performance, Annual Reviews in Control, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.01.001
[41]
Zhang, H., Zhang, G., & Yan, Q. (2018). Digital twin-driven cyber-physical production system towards smart shop-floor. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.
[42]
Patel, P., Ali, M. I., & Sheth, A. (2018). From Raw Data to Smart Manufacturing: AI and Semantic Web of Things for Industry 4.0. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 33(4), 79--86.
[43]
Nakajima, S. (1988), "Introduction to Total Productive Maintenance", Cambridge, MA, Productivity Press.
[44]
Leflar, J. (1999). TPM at Hewlett-Packard. 10th Total Productive Maintenance Conference, Las Vegas, NV, Productivity, Inc.
[45]
VDMA - Mechanical Engineering Industry Association, DIN 8743 information available under https://www.vdma.org/en/v2viewer/-/v2article/render/27106441
[46]
Bange, U. K. (2019): Overall Service Effectiveness - Eine Adaption des OEE-Modells auf die Digitalisierung von After-Sales/Service. Retrieved from: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/overall-service-effectiveness-eine-adaption-des-auf-udo-k-bange/
[47]
Novikov, D. (2016). Cybernetics. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control.
[48]
Beer, S. (1972): Brain of the Firm; Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, London, Herder and Herder, USA.
[49]
Ashby, W.R. (1956): An introduction to Cybernetics. Wiley, New York.
[50]
Hartmann, D., Herz, M., & Wever, U. (2018). Model Order Reduction a Key Technology for Digital Twins. Reduced-Order Modeling (ROM) for Simulation and Optimization, 167--179.
[51]
Wagner, C., Grothoff, J., Epple, U., Drath, R., Malakuti, S., Gruner, S. & Zimermann, P. (2017). The role of the Industry 4.0 asset administration shell and the digital twin during the life cycle of a plant. 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA).
[52]
Malakuti, S., & Grüner, S. (2018). Architectural aspects of digital twins in IIoT systems. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Software Architecture Companion Proceedings - ECSA '18.
[53]
Guo, N. & Jia, C. (2017). Interpretation of Cyber-Physical Systems. Whitepaper. Information Technology & Standardization, 2017;(4): 36--47.
[54]
Zheng, P., Lin, T.-J., Chen, C.-H., & Xu, X. (2018). A systematic design approach for service innovation of smart product-service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 657--667.
[55]
West, S., Gaiardelli, P., Resta, B., Kujawski, D. (2018): Co-creation of value in Product-Service Systems through transforming data into knowledge, IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, iss. 11, pp. 1323--1328
[56]
Canedo, A. (2016). Industrial IoT lifecycle via digital twins. Proceedings of the Eleventh IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis - CODES '16.
[57]
Boschert, S., Rosen, R. (2016): Digital twin - the simulation aspect. In Mechatronic Futures: Challenges and Solutions for Mechatronic Systems and Their Designers, 59--74.
[58]
Tao, F., & Zhang, M. (2017). Digital Twin Shop-Floor: A New Shop-Floor Paradigm Towards Smart Manufacturing. IEEE Access, 5, 20418--20427.
[59]
Abramovici, M., Göbel, J. C., & Dang, H. B. (2016). Semantic data management for the development and continuous reconfiguration of smart products and systems. CIRP Annals, 65(1), 185--188.
[60]
Negri, E., Fumagalli, L., & Macchi, M. (2017). A Review of the Roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based Production Systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 939--948.
[61]
Stark, R., Fresemann, C., & Lindow, K. (2019). Development and operation of Digital Twins for technical systems and services. CIRP Annals, 68(1), 129--132.
[62]
Tharma, R., Winter, R., & Eigner, M. (2018). An approach for the implementation of the digital twin in the automotive wiring harness field. Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference.
[63]
Baines, T. and Lightfoot, H. (2013) Made to Serve: How Manufacturers Can Compete through Servitization and Product Service Systems. Wiley.
[64]
Vandermerwe, S., & Rada, J. (1988). Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services. European Management Journal, 6(4), 314--324.
[65]
West, T. D., & Pyster, A. (2015). Untangling the Digital Thread: The Challenge and Promise of Model-Based Engineering in Defense Acquisition. INSIGHT, 18(2), 45--55.
[66]
Terzi, S., Bouras, A., Dutta, D., Garetti, M. & Kiritsis, D. (2010). Product Lifecycle Management -- From Its History To Its New Role, International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management 4(4), pp. 360--389.
[67]
Cerrone, A., Hochhalter, J., Heber, G., & Ingraffea, A. (2014). On the effects of modeling as-manufactured geometry: Toward Digital Twin. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2014. ArticleID 439278
[68]
Söderberg, R., Wärmefjord, K., Carlson, J. S. & Lindkvist, L. (2017). Toward a Digital Twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production. CIRP Annals, 66 (1), 137--140.
[69]
Kung, C. H., & Solvberg, A. (1986): Activity Modeling and Behavior Modeling, In: Ollie, T., Sol, H. & Verrjin-Stuart, A.: Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1 working conference on comparative review of information systems design methodologies: improving the practice. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 145--171.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Towards Linked Data for Ecosystems of Digital TwinsProceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems10.1145/3652620.3688245(332-337)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Ontologies in digital twins: A systematic literature reviewFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2023.12.013153(442-456)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2024)Resilient and Value Creating Wine Ecosystem: An NFT-Driven Agricultural Digital Twin Case Study with #NFGrapevineSmart Services Summit10.1007/978-3-031-60313-6_7(87-99)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Systematization of Digital Twins: Ontology and Conceptual Framework

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICISS '20: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Science and Systems
      March 2020
      238 pages
      ISBN:9781450377256
      DOI:10.1145/3388176
      © 2020 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      In-Cooperation

      • University of Salford: University of Salford
      • Cardiff University: Cardiff University
      • Kingston University: Kingston University

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 20 April 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Digital Twin
      2. conceptual framework
      3. ontology
      4. systematization

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ICISS 2020

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)197
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25
      Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Towards Linked Data for Ecosystems of Digital TwinsProceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems10.1145/3652620.3688245(332-337)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
      • (2024)Ontologies in digital twins: A systematic literature reviewFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2023.12.013153(442-456)Online publication date: Apr-2024
      • (2024)Resilient and Value Creating Wine Ecosystem: An NFT-Driven Agricultural Digital Twin Case Study with #NFGrapevineSmart Services Summit10.1007/978-3-031-60313-6_7(87-99)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2024
      • (2023)IoT Blockchains for Digital TwinsOpportunities and Challenges of Industrial IoT in 5G and 6G Networks10.4018/978-1-7998-9266-3.ch011(244-260)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2023
      • (2023)IoT Blockchains for Digital TwinsRole of 6G Wireless Networks in AI and Blockchain-Based Applications10.4018/978-1-6684-5376-6.ch003(57-79)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2023
      • (2023)Value Creation with Digital Twins: Application-Oriented Conceptual Framework and Case StudyApplied Sciences10.3390/app1306351113:6(3511)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2023
      • (2023)Towards a Data-Driven Product Management – Concepts, Advantages, and Future Research2023 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)10.1109/ICTMOD59086.2023.10438135(1-6)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2023
      • (2023)Properties and Characteristics of Digital Twins: Review of Industrial DefinitionsSN Computer Science10.1007/s42979-023-01937-44:5Online publication date: 9-Jun-2023
      • (2023)Data and Data Management in the Context of Digital TwinsThe Digital Twin10.1007/978-3-031-21343-4_10(253-278)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2023
      • (2022)Can we benefit from game engines to develop digital twins for planning the deployment of photovoltaics?Energy Informatics10.1186/s42162-022-00222-75:S4Online publication date: 21-Dec-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media