skip to main content
10.1145/3388818.3389160acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesivspConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Disaster Assessment from Satellite Imagery by Analysing Topographical Features Using Deep Learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the application of deep learning techniques in the task of assessing disaster impact from satellite imagery. Identifying the regions impacted by a disaster is critical for effective mobilization of relief efforts. Satellite images, with their vast coverage of ground surface, are a valuable resource that can be leveraged for this purpose. However, the task of analysing a satellite image to detect regions impacted by disaster is challenging. In recent years, the increasing availability of satellite images of a place presents an opportunity to utilize deep learning on these images to provide a preliminary insight on the impact of a disaster after its occurrence. We particularly focus on water related disasters like floods and hurricanes. To identify the impacted regions, we employ Convolutional Neural Networks to semantically segment topographical features like roads on pre and post-disaster satellite images and find the regions with maximal change. However, this approach is less applicable on rural landscapes due to the sparse distribution of topographical features like roads. To address such cases of imagery from rural areas, we propose a bitemporal image classification approach to compare pre and post disaster scenes and directly identify if the regions are impacted or not. On testing against a ground truth satellite image from DigitalGlobe with labeled regions depicting the impacts of Hurricane Harvey, the flooded road extraction approach achieved an accuracy of 0.845 with a F1-Score of 0.675. Similarly, the bitemporal image classification approach registered an accuracy of 0.94 when tested against a rural landscape impacted by South Asian Monsoon Flooding of 2017.

References

  1. Orchid. 2015. ORCHID researchers provide Nepal earthquake response. Retrieved from: http://www.orchid.ac.uk/presses/orchid-researchers-provide-nepal-earthquake-response/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Voigt, S., Giulio, F. T., et al. 2016. Global trends in satellite-based emergency mapping. Science. 353. 247--252. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8728Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Voigt, S., Kemper, T., Riedlinger, T.,Kiefl, R., Scholte, K. and Mehl, H. 2007. Satellite Image Analysis for Disaster and Crisis-Management Support. IEEE T. Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 45. 1520--1528. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.895830Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Trekin, A., Novikov, G., Potapov, G., Ignatiev, V. and Burnaev, E. 2018. Satellite Imagery Analysis for Operational Damage Assessment in Emergency Situations. arXiv:1803.00397. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.00397Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gueguen, L. and Hamid, R. 2015. Large-Scale Damage Detection Using Satellite Imagery. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Boston, MA, USA, June 07-12, 2017). IEEE. 1321--1328. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298737Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Matikainen, L., Juha, H., Kaartinen, H., et al. 2004. Automatic detection of changes from laser scanner and aerial image data for updating building maps, Matrix, 35, 434--439.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Vu, T. T., Matsuoka, M. and Yamazaki, F. 2004. LIDAR-based Change Detection of Buildings in Dense Urban Areas. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Anchorage, AK, USA, September 20-24, 2004). IEEE. 2--6. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2004.1370438Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nogueira, K., Fadel, S., Dourado, I., Werneck, R., et al. 2017. Exploiting ConvNet Diversity for Flooding Identification. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters. 15. 1446--1450. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2018.2845549Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao, Q. D. and Choe, Y. 2018. Building Damage Annotation on Post-Hurricane Satellite Imagery Based on Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv: 1807.01688. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.01688Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Binti, A., Siti, N. K. and Aoki, Y. 2017. Disaster detection from aerial imagery with convolutional neural network. International Electronics Symposium on Knowledge Creation and Intelligent Computing (Surabaya, Indonesia, September 26-27, 2017;. 239--245. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/KCIC.2017.8228593Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooner, A. J., Shao, Y. and Campbell, J. B. 2016. Detection of Urban Damage Using Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Algorithms: Revisiting the 2010 Haiti Earthquake. Remote Sensing. 8, 868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8100868Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Doshi, J., Basu, S. and Pang, G. 2018. From Satellite Imagery to Disaster Insights. arXiv: 1812.07033. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.07033Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Doshi, J. 2018. Residual inception skip network for binary segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (Salt Lake City, UT, USA, June 18-22, 2018). IEEE. 216-219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2018.00037Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. and Brox, T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. arXiv: 1505.04597. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04597Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Demir, I., Koperski, K., Lindenbaum, D., et al. 2018. DeepGlobe 2018: A Challenge to Parse the Earth through Satellite Images. arXiv:1805.06561. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.06561Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. DeepGlobe Open Data Program. Retrieved from: https://www.digitalglobe.com/ecosystem/open-dataGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Schelhamer, E., Long, J. and Darrel, T. 2016. Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 39. 640--651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. and Sun, J. 2015. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. arXiv:1512.03385. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Xie, S., Girshick, R., Dollar, P., Tu, D. and He, K. Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networks. arXiv:1611.05431. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.05431Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Bukenya, F., Yuhaniz, S., Hashim, S. Z. M. and Kalema, A. K. 2012. Detecting floods using an object based change detection approach. International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, July 3-5, 2012). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCE.2012.6271149Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Disaster Assessment from Satellite Imagery by Analysing Topographical Features Using Deep Learning

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IVSP '20: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Image, Video and Signal Processing
          March 2020
          168 pages
          ISBN:9781450376952
          DOI:10.1145/3388818

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          © 2020 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 May 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader