skip to main content
10.1145/3391614.3393652acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimxConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Unpacking Editorial Agreements in Collaborative Video Production

Published: 17 June 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Video production is a collaborative process involving creative, artistic and technical elements that require a multitude of specialised skill sets. This open-ended work is often marked by uncertainty and interpretive flexibility in terms of what the product is and should be. At the same time, most current video production tools are designed for single users. There is a growing interest, both in industry and academia, to design features that support key collaborative processes in editing, such as commenting on videos. We add to current research by unpacking specific forms of collaboration, in particular the social mechanisms and strategies employed to reduce interpretive flexibility and uncertainty in achieving agreements between editors and other collaborators. The findings contribute to the emerging design interest by identifying general design paths for how to support collaboration in video editing through scaffolding, iconic referencing, and suggestive editing.

References

[1]
Susan J Ashford, Katleen De Stobbeleir, and Mrudula Nujella. 2016. To seek or not to seek: Is that the only question? Recent developments in feedback-seeking literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 3 (2016), 213–239.
[2]
Tom Bartindale, Guy Schofield, Clara Crivellaro, and Peter Wright. 2016. Tryfilm: Situated support for interactive media productions. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1412–1422.
[3]
Susanne Bødker and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2011. The human–artifact model: An activity theoretical approach to artifact ecologies. Human–Computer Interaction 26, 4 (2011), 315–371.
[4]
Juan Casares, A Chris Long, Brad A Myers, Rishi Bhatnagar, Scott M Stevens, Laura Dabbish, Dan Yocum, and Albert Corbett. 2002. Simplifying video editing using metadata. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. 157–166.
[5]
Soon Hau Chua, Toni-Jan Keith Palma Monserrat, Dongwook Yoon, Juho Kim, and Shengdong Zhao. 2017. Korero: Facilitating complex referencing of visual materials in asynchronous discussion interface. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW(2017), 34.
[6]
Harry M Collins. 1981. Stages in the empirical programme of relativism.
[7]
Paul Dourish. 2001. Process descriptions as organisational accounting devices: the dual use of workflow technologies. In Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, 52–60.
[8]
Paul Dourish and Victoria Bellotti. 1992. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In CSCW, Vol. 92. 107–114.
[9]
Arvid Engström, Oskar Juhlin, Mark Perry, and Mathias Broth. 2010. Temporal hybridity: footage with instant replay in real time. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1495–1504.
[10]
Elihu M Gerson and Susan Leigh Star. 1986. Analyzing due process in the workplace. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 4, 3 (1986), 257–270.
[11]
Frode Guribye and Lars Nyre. 2017. The Changing Ecology of Tools for Live News Reporting. Journalism Practice 11, 10 (2017), 1216–1230.
[12]
Spencer H Harrison and Elizabeth D Rouse. 2015. An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Academy of Management Journal 58, 2 (2015), 375–404.
[13]
Cisco Visual Networking Index. 2017. Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2016–2021 white paper. Cisco: San Jose, CA, USA(2017).
[14]
Iris Jennes and Wendy Van den Broeck. 2017. The Social Construction of Targeted Television Advertising: The Importance of Social Arrangements in the Development of Targeted Television Advertising in Flanders. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video. ACM, 41–50.
[15]
Oskar Juhlin, Arvid Engström, and Elin Önnevall. 2014. Long tail TV revisited: from ordinary camera phone use to pro-am video production. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1325–1334.
[16]
Oskar Juhlin, Goranka Zoric, Arvid Engström, and Erika Reponen. 2014. Video interaction: a research agenda.
[17]
Joy Kim, Mira Dontcheva, Wilmot Li, Michael S Bernstein, and Daniela Steinsapir. 2015. Motif: Supporting novice creativity through expert patterns. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1211–1220.
[18]
David Kirk, Abigail Sellen, Richard Harper, and Ken Wood. 2007. Understanding videowork. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 61–70.
[19]
Klaus Krippendorff. 2018. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
[20]
Kurt Luther, Jari-Lee Tolentino, Wei Wu, Amy Pavel, Brian P Bailey, Maneesh Agrawala, Björn Hartmann, and Steven P Dow. 2015. Structuring, aggregating, and evaluating crowdsourced design critique. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 473–485.
[21]
Jennifer Marlow, Scott Carter, Nathaniel Good, and Jung-Wei Chen. 2016. Beyond talking heads: multimedia artifact creation, use, and sharing in distributed meetings. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1703–1715.
[22]
Neil Mercer. 1994. Neo-Vygotskian theory and classroom education. Language, literacy and learning in educational practice (1994), 92–110.
[23]
Dean Mobbs, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Hakwan C Lau, Eric Featherstone, Ray J Dolan, and Chris D Frith. 2006. The Kuleshov Effect: the influence of contextual framing on emotional attributions. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience 1, 2 (2006), 95–106.
[24]
Cuong Nguyen, Stephen DiVerdi, Aaron Hertzmann, and Feng Liu. 2017. CollaVR: collaborative in-headset review for VR video. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 267–277.
[25]
Gregory B Northcraft, Aaron M Schmidt, and Susan J Ashford. 2011. Feedback and the rationing of time and effort among competing tasks.Journal of Applied Psychology 96, 5 (2011), 1076.
[26]
Boris Novikov and Oleg Proskurnin. 2003. Towards collaborative video authoring. In East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems. Springer, 370–384.
[27]
Jasper O’Leary, Holger Winnemöller, Wilmot Li, Mira Dontcheva, and Morgan Dixon. 2018. Charrette: Supporting In-Person Discussions around Iterations in User Interface Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.
[28]
Amy Pavel, Dan B Goldman, Björn Hartmann, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2016. VidCrit: video-based asynchronous video review. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 517–528.
[29]
Charles Sanders Peirce. 1902. Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. Philosophical writings of Peirce(1902), 100.
[30]
Mark Perry, Mathias Broth, Arvid Engström, and Oskar Juhlin. 2019. Visual Narrative and Temporal Relevance: Segueing Instant Replay into Live Broadcast TV. Symbolic interaction 42, 1 (2019), 98–126.
[31]
Mark Perry, Oskar Juhlin, Mattias Esbjörnsson, and Arvid Engström. 2009. Lean collaboration through video gestures: co-ordinating the production of live televised sport. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2279–2288.
[32]
Julien Phalip, Ernest A Edmonds, and David Jean. 2009. Supporting remote creative collaboration in film scoring. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition. ACM, 211–220.
[33]
Julien Phalip, Matthew Morphett, and Ernest Edmonds. 2007. Alleviating communication challenges in film scoring: an interaction design approach. In Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces. ACM, 9–16.
[34]
Trevor J Pinch and Wiebe E Bijker. 1984. The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social studies of science 14, 3 (1984), 399–441.
[35]
Michael Quinn Patton. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods.
[36]
Daniela Retelny and Pamela Hinds. 2016. Embedding Intentions in Drawings: How Architects Craft and Curate Drawings to Achieve Their Goals. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1310–1322. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819932
[37]
Kjeld Schmidt and Liam Bannon. 1992. Taking CSCW seriously. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1, 1-2 (1992), 7–40.
[38]
Lucy Suchman. 1993. Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered. In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 13–17 September 1993, Milan, Italy ECSCW’93. Springer, 1–14.
[39]
Naimdjon Takhirov and Fabien Duchateau. 2011. A cloud-based and social authoring tool for video. In ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. 65–68.
[40]
Lucia Terrenghi, Torsten Fritsche, and Andreas Butz. 2008. Designing environments for collaborative video editing. (2008).
[41]
David Wood, Jerome S Bruner, and Gail Ross. 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry 17, 2 (1976), 89–100.
[42]
Alvin Yuan, Kurt Luther, Markus Krause, Sophie Isabel Vennix, Steven P Dow, and Bjorn Hartmann. 2016. Almost an expert: The effects of rubrics and expertise on perceived value of crowdsourced design critiques. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1005–1017.
[43]
Jamie Zigelbaum, Michael S Horn, Orit Shaer, and Robert JK Jacob. 2007. The tangible video editor: collaborative video editing with active tokens. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction. ACM, 43–46.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IMX '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences
June 2020
211 pages
ISBN:9781450379762
DOI:10.1145/3391614
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 June 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Collaborative Video Production
  2. Editorial Agreement
  3. Feedback
  4. Interpretive Flexibility
  5. Video Editing
  6. Video Review

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Norges Forskningsråd

Conference

IMX '20

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 245 submissions, 28%

Upcoming Conference

IMX '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media