research-article

Tile Rate Allocation for 360-Degree Tiled Adaptive Video Streaming

Authors:

Praveen Kumar Yadav,

Wei Tsang OoiAuthors Info & Claims

MM '20: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

Pages 3724 - 3733

https://doi.org/10.1145/3394171.3413550

Published: 12 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

360-degree video streaming commonly encodes and transmits the video as independently-decodable tiles to conserve bandwidth of regions out of the viewer's field of view (FoV). The bitrate of the tiles, however, can vary significantly across the tiles, complicating the choice of the representation to download for each tile in each segment to adapt to the bandwidth dynamics. In this paper, we model the tile rate allocation problem as a multiclass knapsack problem with a dynamic profit function that is a function of the FoV and the buffer occupancy. Experiments show that our approach can reduce bandwidth wastage by up to 41%, the number of stalls by up to 31%, stall durations by up to 26.5%, switches in quality by up to 20%, without sacrificing the quality of the tiles within the FoV, even when there are significant head movement and changes in FoV during streaming.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3394171.3413550.mp4)

360-degree video streaming commonly encodes and transmits the video as independently-decodable tiles to conserve bandwidth of regions out of the viewer?s field of view (FoV). The bitrate of the tiles, however, can vary significantly across the tiles, complicating the choice of the representation to download for each tile in each segment to adapt to the bandwidth dynamics. In this paper, we model the tile rate allocation problem as a multiclass knapsack problem with a dynamic profit function that is a function of the FoV and the buffer occupancy. Experiments show that our approach can reduce bandwidth wastage by up to 41%, the number of stalls by up to 31%, stall durations by up to 26.5%, switches in quality by up to 20%, without sacrificing the quality of the tiles within the FoV, even when there are significant head movement and changes in FoV during streaming.

Download
21.09 MB

References

[1]

ISO/IEC 23009--1:2014/Amd 2:2015. 2015. Spatial relationship description, generalized URL parameters and other extensions. Technical Report. ISO/IEC.

[2]

A Deniz Aladagli, Erhan Ekmekcioglu, Dmitri Jarnikov, and Ahmet Kondoz. 2017. Predicting head trajectories in 360° virtual reality videos. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on 3D Immersion (IC3D). IEEE, San Francisco, CA, 1--6.

[3]

Mathias Almquist, Viktor Almquist, Vengatanathan Krishnamoorthi, Niklas Carlsson, and Derek Eager. 2018. The prefetch aggressiveness tradeoff in 360° video streaming. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys '18). ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 258--269.

Digital Library

[4]

Abdelhak Bentaleb, Ali C Begen, and Roger Zimmermann. 2016. SDNDASH: Improving QoE of HTTP adaptive streaming using software defined networking. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '16). ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1296--1305.

Digital Library

[5]

Abdelhak Bentaleb, Ali C Begen, and Roger Zimmermann. 2018. QoE-aware bandwidth broker for HTTP adaptive streaming flows in an SDN-enabled HFC network. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Vol. 64, 2 (2018), 575--589.

[6]

Cyril Concolato, Jean Le Feuvre, Franck Denoual, Frédéric Mazé, Eric Nassor, Naël Ouedraogo, and Jonathan Taquet. 2018. Adaptive streaming of HEVC tiled videos using MPEG-DASH. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 28, 8 (2018), 1981--1992.

[7]

Xavier Corbillon, Francesca De Simone, and Gwendal Simon. 2017a. 360-degree video head movement dataset. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys '17). ACM, Taipei, Taiwan, 199--204.

Digital Library

[8]

Xavier Corbillon, Gwendal Simon, Alisa Devlic, and Jacob Chakareski. 2017b. Viewport-adaptive navigable 360-degree video delivery. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, Paris, France, 1--7.

[9]

Luca De Cicco, Vito Caldaralo, Vittorio Palmisano, and Saverio Mascolo. 2013. ELASTIC: A client-side controller for dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH). In 20th International Packet Video Workshop. IEEE, San Jose, CA, 1--8.

[10]

Luca De Cicco and Saverio Mascolo. 2014. An adaptive video streaming control system: Modeling, validation, and performance evaluation. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), Vol. 22, 2 (2014), 526--539.

Digital Library

[11]

Ran Dubin, Ofer Hadar, and Amit Dvir. 2013. The effect of client buffer and MBR consideration on DASH adaptation logic. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). IEEE, Shanghai, China, 2178--2183.

[12]

Omar Eltobgy, Omar Arafa, and Mohamed Hefeeda. 2020. Mobile Streaming of Live 360-Degree Videos. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (2020).

[13]

Ching-Ling Fan, Wen-Chih Lo, Yu-Tung Pai, and Cheng-Hsin Hsu. 2019. A survey on 360 video streaming: Acquisition, transmission, and display. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Vol. 52, 4 (2019), 1--36.

Digital Library

[14]

Wu-chi Feng, Thanh Dang, John Kassebaum, and Tim Bauman. 2008. Supporting region-of-interest cropping through constrained compression. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '08). ACM, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 745--748. https://doi.org/10.1145/1459359.1459476

[15]

DASH Industry Forum. 2014. Guidelines for implementation: DASH-AVC/264 test cases and vectors. Web page. http://dashif.org/guidelines/ Retrieved May 25, 2018 from

[16]

Stephen Hemminger. 2005. Network emulation with NetEm. In Proceedings of Australia's National Linux Conference. Canberra, Australia, 18--23.

[17]

Mohammad Hosseini and Viswanathan Swaminathan. 2016a. Adaptive 360 VR video streaming based on MPEG-DASH SRD. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM '16). IEEE, San Jose, California, USA, 407--408.

[18]

Mohammad Hosseini and Viswanathan Swaminathan. 2016b. Adaptive 360 VR video streaming: Divide and conquer. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM '16). IEEE, San Jose, California, USA, 107--110.

[19]

Shenghong Hu, Lingfen Sun, Chao Gui, Emmanuel Jammeh, and Is-Haka Mkwawa. 2014. Content-aware adaptation scheme for QoE optimized DASH applications. In 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM '14). IEEE, Austin, Texas, USA, 1336--1341.

[20]

Te-Yuan Huang, Ramesh Johari, Nick McKeown, Matthew Trunnell, and Mark Watson. 2015. A buffer-based approach to rate adaptation: Evidence from a large video streaming service. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 44, 4 (2015), 187--198.

Digital Library

[21]

Parikshit Juluri, Venkatesh Tamarapalli, and Deep Medhi. 2015. SARA: Segment aware rate adaptation algorithm for dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW). IEEE, London, UK, 1765--1770.

[22]

Kvazaar. 2018. Kvazaar. Web page. https://github.com/ultravideo/kvazaar

[23]

Jean Le Feuvre and Cyril Concolato. 2016. Tiled-based adaptive streaming using MPEG-DASH. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys '16). ACM, Klagenfurt, Austria, Article 41, bibinfonumpages3 pages.

Digital Library

[24]

Jean Le Feuvre and Cyril Concolato. 2018. GPAC. Web page. https://gpac.wp.imt.fr Retrieved April 2, 2019 from

[25]

Zhi Li, Xiaoqing Zhu, Joshua Gahm, Rong Pan, Hao Hu, Ali C Begen, and David Oran. 2014. Probe and adapt: Rate adaptation for HTTP video streaming at scale. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 32, 4 (2014), 719--733.

[26]

Wen-Chih Lo, Ching-Ling Fan, Jean Lee, Chun-Ying Huang, Kuan-Ta Chen, and Cheng-Hsin Hsu. 2017. 360 video viewing dataset in head-mounted virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys '17). ACM, Taipei, Taiwan, 211--216.

Digital Library

[27]

Hongzi Mao, Ravi Netravali, and Mohammad Alizadeh. 2017. Neural adaptive video streaming with Pensieve. In Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM '17). ACM, Los Angeles, California, USA, 197--210.

Digital Library

[28]

Britta Meixner, Jan Willem Kleinrouweler, and Pablo Cesar. 2018. 4G/LTE channel quality reference signal trace data set. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys '18). ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 387--392.

Digital Library

[29]

Konstantin Miller, Abdel-Karim Al-Tamimi, and Adam Wolisz. 2016. QoE-based low-delay live streaming using throughput predictions. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Application, Vol. 13, 1, Article 4 (Oct. 2016), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2990505

[30]

Ricky KP Mok, Xiapu Luo, Edmond WW Chan, and Rocky KC Chang. 2012. QDASH: A QoE-aware DASH system. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys '12). ACM, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 11--22.

Digital Library

[31]

Christopher Müller and Christian Timmerer. 2011. A VLC media player plugin enabling dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '11). ACM, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, 723--726.

Digital Library

[32]

Afshin Taghavi Nasrabadi, Anahita Mahzari, Joseph D Beshay, and Ravi Prakash. 2017. Adaptive 360-degree video streaming using scalable video coding. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '17). ACM, Mountain View, California, USA, 1689--1697.

Digital Library

[33]

Anh Nguyen, Zhisheng Yan, and Klara Nahrstedt. 2018. Your attention is unique: Detecting 360-degree video saliency in head-mounted display for head movement prediction. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '18). ACM, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 1190--1198.

Digital Library

[34]

Omar A Niamut, Emmanuel Thomas, Lucia D'Acunto, Cyril Concolato, Franck Denoual, and Seong Yong Lim. 2016. MPEG DASH SRD: Spatial relationship description. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys '16). ACM, Klagenfurt, Austria, 5.

Digital Library

[35]

Stefano Petrangeli, Viswanathan Swaminathan, Mohammad Hosseini, and Filip De Turck. 2017. An HTTP/2-based adaptive streaming framework for 360 virtual reality videos. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '17). ACM, Mountain View, California, USA, 306--314.

Digital Library

[36]

David Pisinger. 1995. A minimal algorithm for the multiple-choice knapsack problem. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 83, 2 (1995), 394--410.

[37]

Feng Qian, Bo Han, Qingyang Xiao, and Vijay Gopalakrishnan. 2018. Flare: Practical viewport-adaptive 360-degree video streaming for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '18). ACM, New Delhi, India, 99--114.

Digital Library

[38]

Feng Qian, Lusheng Ji, Bo Han, and Vijay Gopalakrishnan. 2016. Optimizing 360 video delivery over cellular networks. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on All Things Cellular: Operations, Applications and Challenges. ACM, London, United Kingdom, 1--6.

Digital Library

[39]

Ngo Quang Minh Khiem, Guntur Ravindra, Axel Carlier, and Wei Tsang Ooi. 2010. Supporting zoomable video streams with dynamic region-of-interest cropping. In Proceedings of the First Annual ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys '10). ACM, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 259--270. https://doi.org/10.1145/1730836.1730868

Digital Library

[40]

Benjamin Rainer, Stefan Lederer, Christopher Müller, and Christian Timmerer. 2012. A seamless Web integration of adaptive HTTP streaming. In Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '12). IEEE, Bucharest, Romania, 1519--1523.

[41]

Hideaki Shimazaki and Shigeru Shinomoto. 2007. A method for selecting the bin size of a time histogram. Neural computation, Vol. 19, 6 (2007), 1503--1527.

[42]

Prabhakant Sinha and Andris A Zoltners. 1979. The multiple-choice knapsack problem. Operations Research, Vol. 27, 3 (1979), 503--515.

Digital Library

[43]

Kevin Spiteri, Ramesh Sitaraman, and Daniel Sparacio. 2018. From theory to practice: Improving bitrate adaptation in the DASH reference player. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys '18). ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 123--137.

Digital Library

[44]

Kevin Spiteri, Rahul Urgaonkar, and Ramesh K Sitaraman. 2016. BOLA: Near-optimal bitrate adaptation for online videos. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM '16). IEEE, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1--9.

[45]

Kashyap Kammachi Sreedhar, Alireza Aminlou, Miska M Hannuksela, and Moncef Gabbouj. 2016. Viewport-adaptive encoding and streaming of 360-degree video for virtual reality applications. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM '16). IEEE, San Jose, California, USA, 583--586.

[46]

Liyang Sun, Fanyi Duanmu, Yong Liu, Yao Wang, Yinghua Ye, Hang Shi, and David Dai. 2018. Multi-path multi-tier 360-degree video streaming in 5G networks. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys '18). ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 162--173.

Digital Library

[47]

Afshin TaghaviNasrabadi, Anahita Mahzari, Joseph D Beshay, and Ravi Prakash. 2017. Adaptive 360-degree video streaming using layered video coding. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR '17). IEEE, Los Angeles, California, USA, 347--348.

[48]

Truong Cong Thang, Quang-Dung Ho, Jung Won Kang, and Anh T Pham. 2012. Adaptive streaming of audiovisual content using MPEG DASH. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vol. 58, 1 (2012), 78--85.

[49]

Hui Wang, Vu-Thanh Nguyen, Wei Tsang Ooi, and Mun Choon Chan. 2014. Mixing tile resolutions in tiled video: A perceptual quality assessment. In Proceedings of Network and Operating System Support on Digital Audio and Video Workshop (NOSSDAV '14). ACM, Singapore, Singapore, 25--30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2597176.2578267

[50]

XAUT. 2018. Formerly Xutomation. Web page. http://xautomation.sourceforge.net

[51]

Mengbai Xiao, Shuoqian Wang, Chao Zhou, Li Liu, Zhenhua Li, Yao Liu, and Songqing Chen. 2018. MiniView layout for bandwidth-efficient 360-degree video. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '18). ACM, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 914--922.

Digital Library

[52]

Mengbai Xiao, Chao Zhou, Yao Liu, and Songqing Chen. 2017. Optile: Toward optimal tiling in 360-degree video streaming. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '17). ACM, Mountain View, California, USA, 708--716.

Digital Library

[53]

Shichang Xu, Subhabrata Sen, Z Morley Mao, and Yunhan Jia. 2017. Dissecting VOD services for cellular: Performance, root causes and best practices. In Proceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference. ACM, London, United Kingdom, 220--234.

Digital Library

[54]

Praveen Kumar Yadav. 2020. A queueing theory approach to adaptive video streaming. Ph.D. Dissertation. School of Computing, National University of Singapore.

[55]

Praveen Kumar Yadav, Arash Shafiei, and Wei Tsang Ooi. 2017. QUETRA: A queuing theory approach to DASH rate adaptation. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '17). ACM, Mountain View, California, USA, 1130--1138.

Digital Library

[56]

Xiaoqi Yin, Abhishek Jindal, Vyas Sekar, and Bruno Sinopoli. 2015. A control-theoretic approach for dynamic adaptive video streaming over HTTP. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 45, 4 (2015), 325--338.

Digital Library

[57]

YouTube. 2018. YouTube: Recommended upload encoding settings. Web page. https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/1722171 Retrieved April 2, 2019 from

[58]

Alireza Zare, Alireza Aminlou, Miska M. Hannuksela, and Moncef Gabbouj. 2016. HEVC-compliant tile-based streaming of panoramic video for virtual reality applications. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '16). ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 601--605.

Digital Library

Cited By

Chaudhary STaneja ASingh ARoy PSikdar SMaity MBhattacharya ABagchi SZhang Y(2024)TileClipperProceedings of the 2024 USENIX Conference on Usenix Annual Technical Conference10.5555/3691992.3692051(967-984)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3691992.3692051
Tan XWang SXu XZheng QYang JChen S(2024)DACOD360: Deadline-Aware Content Delivery for 360-Degree Video Streaming Over MEC NetworksIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2023.332143926(4168-4182)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TMM.2023.3321439
Li ZZhong PHuang JGao FWang J(2024)Achieving QoE Fairness in Bitrate Allocation of 360° Video StreamingIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2023.327728626(1169-1178)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2023.3277286
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Tile Rate Allocation for 360-Degree Tiled Adaptive Video Streaming
1. Information systems
  1. Information systems applications
    1. Multimedia information systems
      1. Multimedia streaming

Recommendations

Tile Priorities in Adaptive 360-Degree Video Streaming
Smart Multimedia
Abstract
For video applications, tiled streaming is a popular way to deliver viewport dependent 360-degree video. Unfortunately, dynamic adaptation to network bandwidth fluctuations of such video streams is still a challenge. This paper proposes a method ...
A measurement study of YouTube 360° live video streaming
NOSSDAV '19: Proceedings of the 29th ACM Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video

360° live video streaming is becoming increasingly popular. While providing viewers with enriched experience, 360° live video streaming is challenging to achieve since it requires a significantly higher bandwidth and a powerful computation ...
Personalized 360-Degree Video Streaming: A Meta-Learning Approach
MM '22: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

Over the past decades, 360-degree videos have attracted wide interest for the immersive experience they bring to viewers. The rising of high-resolution 360-degree videos greatly challenges the traditional video streaming systems in limited network ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

MM '20: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

October 2020

4889 pages

ISBN:9781450379885

DOI:10.1145/3394171

General Chairs:
Chang Wen Chen
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
,
Rita Cucchiara
UNIMORE, Italy
,
Xian-Sheng Hua
Alibaba Group, China
,
Program Chairs:
Guo-Jun Qi
Futurewei Technologies, USA
,
Elisa Ricci
UNITN & Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Italy
,
Zhengyou Zhang
Tencent, China
,
Roger Zimmermann
National University of Singapore, Singapore

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 October 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

NExT++ research, supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under its IRC@SG Funding Initiative

Conference

MM '20

Sponsor:

SIGMM

MM '20: The 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

October 12 - 16, 2020

WA, Seattle, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,145 of 8,556 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

26
Total Citations
View Citations
583
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)47
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Chaudhary STaneja ASingh ARoy PSikdar SMaity MBhattacharya ABagchi SZhang Y(2024)TileClipperProceedings of the 2024 USENIX Conference on Usenix Annual Technical Conference10.5555/3691992.3692051(967-984)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3691992.3692051
Tan XWang SXu XZheng QYang JChen S(2024)DACOD360: Deadline-Aware Content Delivery for 360-Degree Video Streaming Over MEC NetworksIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2023.332143926(4168-4182)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TMM.2023.3321439
Li ZZhong PHuang JGao FWang J(2024)Achieving QoE Fairness in Bitrate Allocation of 360° Video StreamingIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2023.327728626(1169-1178)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2023.3277286
Zhu YHuang YQiao XTang JSu X(2024)HiVAT: Improving QoE for Hybrid Video Streaming Service With Adaptive TranscodingIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2024.339939823:12(11209-11226)Online publication date: Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2024.3399398
Wang YLi JLi ZShang SLiu Y(2024)Synergistic Temporal-Spatial User-Aware Viewport Prediction for Optimal Adaptive 360-Degree Video StreamingIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting10.1109/TBC.2024.337411970:2(453-467)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2024.3374119
Zhao YCai KZhang JChen ZChen Z(2024)Online tile dispatching framework with guarantees for 360-degree video streaming in wireless networksWireless Networks10.1007/s11276-024-03871-6Online publication date: 18-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-024-03871-6
Huang JLiu MLiu JGao FLi WWang J(2024)Tile-size aware bitrate allocation for adaptive 360$$^{\circ }$$ video streamingMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-024-19486-0Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19486-0
Guo PSu WZhang XChen HMa Z(2024)Modeling the non-uniform retinal perception for viewport-dependent streaming of immersive videoMultimedia Systems10.1007/s00530-024-01434-530:4Online publication date: 5-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-024-01434-5
Jiang KHu JFang CLi H(2023)Adaptive Anti-jitter Optimization for Immersive Streaming in Metaverse ScenariosProceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on High Performance Compilation, Computing and Communications10.1145/3606043.3606087(310-319)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3606043.3606087
Yaqoob AMuntean G(2023)Advanced Predictive Tile Selection Using Dynamic Tiling for Prioritized 360° Video VR StreamingACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/360314620:1(1-28)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603146
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten