skip to main content
10.1145/3394486.3412859acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Simulating the Impact of Hospital Capacity and Social Isolation to Minimize the Propagation of Infectious Diseases

Published:20 August 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Infectious diseases can spread from an infected person to a susceptible person through direct or indirect physical contact, consequently controlling such types of spread is difficult. However, a proper decision at the initial stage can help control the disease's propagation before it turns into a pandemic. Social distancing and hospital capacity are considered among the most critical parameters to manage these types of conditions. In this paper, we used artificial agent-based simulation modeling to identify the importance of social distancing and hospitals' capacity in terms of the number of beds to shorten the length of an outbreak and reduce the total number of infections and deaths during an epidemic. After simulating the model based on different scenarios in a small artificial society, we learned that shorter social isolation activation delay has a higher impact on reducing the catastrophe. Increasing the hospital's treatment capacity, i.e., the number of isolation beds in the hospitals can become handy when social isolation cannot be activated shortly. The model can be considered a prototype to take proper steps based on the simulations on different parameter settings towards the control of an epidemic.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3394486.3412859.mkv

mkv

54.5 MB

References

  1. Jürgen Hackl and Thibaut Dubernet. 2019. Epidemic Spreading in Urban Areas Using Agent-Based Transportation Models. Future Internet 11, 4 (2019), 92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11040092.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. William Ogilvy Kermack and Anderson Gray McKendrick. 1927. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character 115, 772 (August 1927), 700--721. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0118Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Elizabeth Sebastian and Priyanka Victor. 2018. An Approach to SIR Epi-demic Model using Markovian Retrial Queues. cm 2, 1 (2018), 89--96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26524/jcm31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jong-Shenq Guo, Amy Ai Ling Poh, and Masahiko Shimojo. 2019. The spread-ing speed of an SIR epidemic model with nonlocal dispersal. ASY (2019), 1--12. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3233/asy-191584Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Luciano Misici and Filippo Santarelli. 2013. Epidemic Propagation: An Automaton Model as the Continuous SIR Model. AM 04, 10 (2013), 84--89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2013.410a3011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Min Zhu, Xiaofei Guo, and Zhigui Lin. 2017. The risk index for an SIR epidemic model and spatial spreading of the infectious disease. MBE 14, 5/6 (2017), 1565--1583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2017081Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Peter R. Odell. 1983. Book review: Bailey, N.T.J. 1975: The mathematical theory of infectious diseases and its application. London: Griffin. Progress in Human Geography 7, 3 (1983), 442--444. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/030913258300700313Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Grabowski and R. Kosiński. 2008. The SIRS Model of Epidemic Spreading in Virtual Society. Acta Phys. Pol. A 114, 3 (September 2008), 589--596. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12693/aphyspola.114.589Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Alison Gray, Xuerong Mao, Daqing Jiang, and Yanan Zhao. 2015. The threshold of a stochastic SIRS epidemic model in a population with varying size. DCDS-B20, 4 (2015), 1277--1295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1277Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Enrique Frias-Martinez, Graham Williamson, and Vanessa Frias-Martinez. 2011.An Agent-Based Model of Epidemic Spread Using Human Mobility and Social Network Information. (2011). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/passat/socialcom.2011.142Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Alberto d'Onofrio. 2005. On pulse vaccination strategy in the SIR epidemic model with vertical transmission. Applied Mathematics Letters 18, 7 (2005), 729--732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2004.05.012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Xinzhu Meng and Lansun Chen. 2008. The dynamics of a new SIR epidemic model concerning pulse vaccination strategy. Applied Mathematics and Computation 197, 2 (2008), 582--597. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2007.07.083Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Russell Connell, Peter Dawson, and Alex Dawson. 2009. Comparison of an Agent-Based Model of Disease Propagation with the Generalised SIR Epidemic Model. DSTO-TR-23 (2009), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Özgür Özmen, James J Nutaro, Laura L Pullum, and Arvind Ramanathan.2016. Analyzing the impact of modeling choices and assumptions in compartmental epidemiological models. SIMULATION 92, 5 (2016), 459--472. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549716640877Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Meike Will, Jürgen Groeneveld, Karin Frank, and Birgit Müller. 2020. Combining social network analysis and agent-based modelling to explore dynamics of human interaction: A review. SESMO 2, (March 2020), 16325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18174/sesmo.2020a16325Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Srinivasan Venkatramanan, Bryan Lewis, Jiangzhuo Chen, Dave Higdon, AnilVullikanti, and Madhav Marathe. 2018. Using data-driven agent-based models for forecasting emerging infectious diseases. 22, (January 2018), 43--49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2017.02.010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Duygu Balcan, Bruno Gonçalves, Hao Hu, José J. Ramasco, Vittoria Colizza, and Alessandro Vespignani. 2010. Modeling the spatial spread of infectious diseases: The Global Epidemic and Mobility computational model. Journal of Computational Science 1, 3 (2010), 132--145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2010.07.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Marco Ajelli, Bruno Gonçalves, Duygu Balcan, Vittoria Colizza, Hao Hu, José J Ramasco, Stefano Merler, and Alessandro Vespignani. 2010. Comparing large-scale computational approaches to epidemic modeling: Agent-based versus structured metapopulation models. BMC Infect Dis 10, 1 (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-190Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Waqar Jaffry and Jan Treur. 2008. Agent-Based And Population-BasedSimulation: A Comparative Case Study For Epidemics. (June 2008). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7148/2008-0123Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Michael J North, Nicholson T Collier, Jonathan Ozik, Eric R Tatara, Charles M Macal, Mark Bragen, and Pam Sydelko. 2013. Complex adaptive systems modeling with Repast Simphony. Complex Adapt Syst Model 1, 1 (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2194-3206-1-3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Simulating the Impact of Hospital Capacity and Social Isolation to Minimize the Propagation of Infectious Diseases

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            KDD '20: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
            August 2020
            3664 pages
            ISBN:9781450379984
            DOI:10.1145/3394486

            Copyright © 2020 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 August 2020

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

            Upcoming Conference

            KDD '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader