skip to main content
10.1145/3396743.3396766acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmsieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Service Quality Assessment of Theme Park

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Theme park is one of the most important assets in tourism industry. To maintain its existence, one of the most important things is by considering customer satisfaction. Since service quality is regarded vital due to its close connection with customer satisfaction, assessing it would be beneficial for service providers. The objective of this research is to assess the service quality of a theme park. The weighted SERVPERF combined with importance-performance analysis were used to accomplish the objective of the research. However, since the attributes in the SERVPERF are intended for assessing "general service", the attributes of THEMEQUAL--- which was developed in theme park setting---are utilized instead. To show the applicability of the proposed method, a case study was conducted to assess the service quality of a theme park located in Jakarta, Indonesia. Result shows that the performance of the object of the research is 3.009 (of 5.000), or in the "average" state. It means that improve-ment must be made to enhance the service quality.

References

  1. Themed Entertainment Association. 2018. Theme Index and Museum Index: The Global Attractions Attendance Report. Retrieved from: https://www.aecom.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Theme-Index-2018-4.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sylt, C. 2018. 'Experience economy' boosts theme park spending to a record $45 billion. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/csylt/2018/11/04/experience-economy-boosts-theme-park-spending-to-a-record-45-billion/#370e03f629e4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hunt, K. 2011. Asia's growing middle class fuels theme park booms. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-14928091Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions. 2012. Amusement park industry statistics. Retrieved from:https://www.iaapa.org/pressroom/Amusement_Park_%20Industry_Statistics.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Anisa, D. F. 2019. Indonesia prepares new strategy to meet 2019 tourist arrival target. Retrieved from: https://jakartaglobe.id/context/indonesia-misses-tourists-arrival-targets-set-up-new-strategy-to-capture-higher-targets-this-year/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Laporan Tahunan 2018 PT Pembangunan Jaya Ancol. 2019. Retrieved from: https://korporat.ancol.com/fm/app/public/files/Laporan%20Tahunan%202018.pdf. (in Bahasa Indonesia)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Formica, S. and Olsen, M. D. 1998. Trends in the amusement park industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 10, 7, 297--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Milman, A. 2001. The future of the theme park and attraction industry: A management perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 40, 2, 139--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Gilbert, G. R. and Veloutsou, C. 2006. A cross-industry comparison of customer satisfaction. Journal of Services Marketing, 20, 5, 298--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chow, I. H. S., Lau, V. P., Lo, T. W. C., Sha, Z., and Yun, H. 2007. Service quality in restaurant operations in China: Decision-and experiential-oriented perspectives," International Journal of Hospitality Management, 26, 3, 698--710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. 1988. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 1, 12--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cronin, Jr., J. J. and Taylor, S. A. 1992. Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56, 55--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Cronin, J. J. and Taylor, S. A. 1994. SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: reconciling performance based and perceptions-minus expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58, 125--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Teas, K. R. 1993. Consumer expectations and the measurement of perceived service quality. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 8, 33--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Buttle, F. 1996. SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda, European Journal of Marketing, 30, 8--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Carman, J. M. 1990. Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions, Journal of Retailing, 66, 33--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsang, N. F. K., Lee, L. Y. S., Wong, A., and Chong, R. 2012. THEMEQUAL---Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to theme park services: a case of Hong Kong Disneyland. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 29, 5, 416--429. DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2012.691391Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Martilla, J. and James, J. 1977. Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41, 1, 77--79. DOI= 10.2307/1250495Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ulkhaq, M. M., Wijayanti, W. R., Kusumawati, A., Aulia, F. S., Wijayanti, R. S., and Wiganingrum, R. 2017. Combining the eTransQual scale and importance- performance analysis to assess service quality of online shopping. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (Nagoya, Japan, April 21-23, 2017). ICIEA '17. IEEE, 146--150. DOI= http://10.1109/IEA.2017.7939196Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pramono, S. N. W., Ulkhaq, M. M., Trianto, R., Rasyida, D. R., Setyorini, N. A., Setiowati, P. R., and Jauhari, W. A. 2017. Integrating the analytic hierarchy process and importance-performance analysis into ISO 14001 framework for assessing campus sustainability. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1902, 020035. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5010652Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ulkhaq, M. M., Widodo, A. K., Widhiyaningrum, Yulianto, M. F. A., Gracia, M. O. 2019. An integrated M-S-QUAL and importance-performance analysis approach for assessing service quality of mobile commerce application. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2114, 060001. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5112472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ulkhaq, M. M., Rabbani, M., Rachmania, B. A., Wibowo, A. T., and Ardi, F. 2019. Integrating Importance- Performance Analysis into E-S-QUAL and E-RecS-QUAL scales for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 598, 1, 012002. DOI= http://10.1088/1757-899X/598/1/012002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Rasyida, D. R., Ulkhaq, M. M., Setiowati, P. R., and Setyorini, N.A. 2016. Assessing service quality: a combination of SERVPERF and importance-performance analysis. MATEC Web of Conferences, 68, 06003. DOI=http://10.1051/matecconf/20166806003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Booms, B. H. and Bitner, M. J. 1982. Marketing services by managing the environment. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 23, 1, 35--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Pikkemaat, B. and Schuckert, M. 2007. Success factors of theme parks---An exploratory study. Tourism, 55, 197--208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Parasuraman, A. Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. 1985. A conceptual model of service and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 43, 41--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Carman, J. M. 1990. Consumer perceptions of service quality: An assessment of SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing, 66, 1, 33--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Nunnally, J. C. 1994. Psychometric Theory, 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Fotiadis, A. K. and Vassiliadis, C. A. 2016. Service Quality at Theme Parks, Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 17, 178--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Chen, K. Y. 2014. Improving importance-performance analysis: the role of the zone of tolerance and competitor performance. The case of Taiwan's hot spring hotels. Tourism Management, 40, 260--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Ulkhaq, M. M., Putra, B. E., Arianie, G. P., Amalia, A. N., and Pramono, S.N. W. 2016. Applying CZSQ and CZIPA for assessing service quality of domestic low-cost carriers. Journal of Economic, Business and Management, 4, 538--545.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Ulkhaq, M. M. Prakoso, M. F. A., Sari, V. K., and Maduma, L. 2018. Evaluating hospital service quality: An application of CZSQ and CZIPA. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 9, 246--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Service Quality Assessment of Theme Park

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MSIE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering
      April 2020
      341 pages
      ISBN:9781450377065
      DOI:10.1145/3396743

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 May 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader