skip to main content
10.1145/3396743.3396773acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmsieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling Regional Innovative System Performance in China Using A Dynamic Two-Stage SBM Model

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Innovative development has always been an important policy tool for accumulating effective intelligent property to the desirability of all policy makers in China, even more so now as the trade war has seriously threatened the Chinese economy. To understand the efficacy of regional innovative policies, we proposed the dynamic two-stage slacks-based measure (SBM) model with carry-over and intermediate variables, highlighting the importance of the status of invention patent, as granted patent and patent in force, to measure the overall innovative performance for the purposed of regional innovative development, which makes significant difference to previous studies on modelling setting. Using data of 30 provincial administration regions in China for the period of 2011-2017, the average regional innovative system performance is deemed as 0.5858 and we postulated that the difference of commercialization performance among three main areas should be pay attention, because the average performance of commercialization stage in the east area is obviously better than that the west and central areas. Based on this finding, we propose several policy suggestions as the provincial and central government who should be put more efforts on innovative competitiveness, as enhancing the quality and quantity of invention patents and the market-oriented to guild the direction for the R&D stage.

References

  1. Lin, T.Y., Chiu, S.H. 2018. Sustainable performance of low-carbon energy infrastructure investment on regional development: Evidence from China. Sustainability 10(12), 4657. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124657Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Tone, K. 2001. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130, 498--509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cook, W.D., Liang, L., Zhu, J. 2010. Measuring performance of two-stage network structure by DEA: A review and future perspective. Omega 38, 423--430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.12.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Galagedera, D.U.A., Roshdi, I., Fukuyama, H., Zhu, J. 2018. A new network DEA model for mutual fund performance appraisal: An application to U.S. equity mutual funds. Omega 77, 168--179. Http://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.06.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Iftikhar, Y., Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Wang, B. 2018. Energy and CO2 emissions efficiency of major economies: A network DEA approach. Energy 147, 197--207. Http://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Tone, K., Tsutsui, M. 2009. Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197(1), 243--252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Tone, K., Tsutsui, M. 2014. Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure. Omega 42. 124--131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.04.002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Seiford, L.M., Thrall, R.M. 1990. Recent developments in DEA: the mathematic programming approach to frontier analysis. J. Econom. 46, 7-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90045-UGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Zhang, B., Luo, Y., Chiu, Y.H. 2019. Efficiency evaluation of China's high-tech industry with multi-activity network data envelopment analysis approach. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 66, 2--9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.07.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Zhong, W., Yuan, W., Li, S.X., Huang, Z. 2011. The performance evaluation of regional R&D investment in China: An application of DEA based on the first official China economic census data. Omega 39, 447--455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.09.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Li, L.B., Liu, B.L., Liu, W.L., Chiu, Y.H. 2017. Efficiency evaluation of the regional high-tech industry in China: A new framework based on meta-frontier dynamic DEA analysis. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 60, 24--33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.02.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Xiong, X., Yang, G.L., Guan, Z.C. 2018. Assessing R&D efficiency using a two-stage dynamic DEA model: A case study of research institutes in the Chinese Academy of Sciences. J. Informetr. 12, 784--805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lu, W.M., Kweh, Q.L., Huang, C.L. 2014. Intellectual capital and national innovation systems performance. Knowledge-Based Syst. 71, 201--210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.08.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lu, W.M., Kweh, Q.L., Nourani, M., Huang, F.W. 2016. Evaluating the efficiency of dual-use technology development programs from the R&D and socio-economic perspectives. Omega 62, 82--92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kao, C. 2013. Dynamic data envelopment analysis: a relational analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 227, 325--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Li, Y., Shi, X., Yang, M., Liang, I. 2017. Variables selection in data envelopment analysis via Akaike's information. Ann. Oper. Res. 253, 453--476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2382-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Tone, K., Kweh, Q.L., Lu, W.M., Ting, I.W.K. 2019. Modeling investments in the dynamic network performance of insurance companies. Omega 88, 237--247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.09.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Golany, B., Roll, Y. 1989. An application procedure for DEA. Omega 17, 237--250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(89)90029-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Cooper, W.W., Li, S., Seiford, L., Tone, K., Thrall, R.M., Zhue, J. 2001. Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA: Some recent development. J. Prod. Anal. 15, 217--246. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011128409257Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Tone, K., Tsutsui, M. 2010. Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure. Omega 38, 145--156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.07.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Modeling Regional Innovative System Performance in China Using A Dynamic Two-Stage SBM Model

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        MSIE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering
        April 2020
        341 pages
        ISBN:9781450377065
        DOI:10.1145/3396743

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 May 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader