skip to main content
10.1145/3396743.3396783acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmsieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Load Distribution and Lifting Duration Effects on Upper Limb Strain for Manual Handling

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The effects of load distribution and lifting duration on muscular strain of upper limbs were examined in the study. Fifteen task conditions that consisted of 5 load distributions (1 balanced and 4 unbalanced patterns) and 3 lifting durations (1, 2 and 3 s/lift) were performed in the experiment. A total of 15 subjects were recruited. Electromyographic data were measured from 5 muscles of right upper limb. Hand forces were obtained at both handles, which were equipped with load cells. The results showed that the upper limb muscular strains increased when the load distribution of objects lifted was not balanced. The lifting durations had the significant effect on the biomechanical behavior of upper limbs. The risk of musculoskeletal disorders of upper limbs became higher when fast lifting was performed. The study results suggested that the center of mass should be located at the center of the load and the lifting duration should not be shorter to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injury to the operator.

References

  1. Harari, Y., Riemer, R., and Bechar, A. 2018. Factors determining workers' pace while conducting continuous sequential lifting, carrying, and lowering tasks. Applied Ergonomics, 67, 61--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Lin, C. J., Wang, S. J., and Chen, H. J. 2006. A field evaluation method for assessing whole body biomechanical joint stress in manual lifting tasks. Industrial Health, 44(4), 604--612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Meyers, B. M., and Keir, P. J. 2003. Trunk muscle response to lifting unbalanced loads with and without knowledge of centre of mass. Clinical Biomechanics, 18(8), 712--720.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Gilad, I., and Boughanim, D. 2002. Three-Dimensional Lifting Model For Non-Homogeneous Loads. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 8(4), 511--524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Chen, Y. L., and Ho, T. K. 2016. Psychophysically determining the maximum acceptable weight of lift for polypropylene laminated bags. Industrial Health, 54(6), 550--553.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chen, Y.-L., 2000. Changes in lifting dynamics after localized arm fatigue. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 25, 611--619.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chen, H. C., Chen, C. Y., Lee, C. L., Wu, H. C., and Lou, S. Z., 2006. Data logging and analysis tools for worksite measurement of physical workload. In: 16th World Congress on Ergonomics, July 10--14, Maastricht, Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lavender, S. A., Andersson, G. B., Schipplein, O. D., and Fuentes, H. J. 2003. The effects of initial lifting height, load magnitude, and lifting speed on the peak dynamic L5/S1 moments. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 31(1), 51--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Oliveira, A. B., Silva, L. C., and Coury, H. J., 2011. How do low/high height and weight variation affect upper limb movements during manual material handling of industrial boxes? Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 15(6), 494--502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Waters, T. R., Putz-Anderson, V., and Garg, A., 1994. Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin, C. J., and Cheng, C. F., 2017. Lifting speed preferences and their effects on the maximal lifting capacity. Industrial Health, 55(1), 27--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. De Looze, M. P. de, Kingma, I., Thunissen, W., Wijk, M. J. van, and Toussaint, H. M., 1994. The evaluation of a practical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities. Ergonomics, 37(9), 1495--1502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lavender, S. A., Li, Y. C., Andersson, G. B. J., and Natarajan, R. N., 1999. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments. Ergonomics, 42(1), 111--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Wang, E. M., Wang, M. -J., Yeh, W. -Y., Shih, Y. -C., and Lin, Y.-C., 1999. Development of anthropometric work environment for Taiwanese workers. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 23, 3--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hislop, H. J., Montgomery, J., Connelly, B., and Daniels, L., 1995. Daniels and Worthingham's Muscle testing: Techniques of manual examination. W.B. Saunders Co., MO, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lavender, S.A., and Marras, W.S., 1990. An electromyographic analysis of an ergonomic intervention with the jackleg drill. Applied Ergonomics, 21(2), 90--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Agruss, C. D., Williams, K. R., and Fathallah, F. A., 2004. The effect of feedback training on lumbosacral compression during simulated occupational lifting. Ergonomics, 47(10), 1103--1115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gundogdu, O., Anderson, K. S., and Parnianpour, M., 2005. Simulation of manual materials handling: Biomechanial assessment under different lifting conditions. Technology and Health Care-European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 13(1), 57--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Bernard, T. M., Ayoub, M. M., and Lin, C. J., 1999. Effects of speed of lift on static and inertial moments at the joints. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(1), 39--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. De Looze, M. P., Boeken-Kruger, M. C., Steenhuizen, S., Baten, C. T. M., Kingma, I., and Van Dieën, J. H., 2000. Trunk muscle activation and low back loading in lifting in the absence of load knowledge. Ergonomics, 43(3), 333--344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Load Distribution and Lifting Duration Effects on Upper Limb Strain for Manual Handling

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MSIE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering
      April 2020
      341 pages
      ISBN:9781450377065
      DOI:10.1145/3396743

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 May 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader