ABSTRACT
The effects of load distribution and lifting duration on muscular strain of upper limbs were examined in the study. Fifteen task conditions that consisted of 5 load distributions (1 balanced and 4 unbalanced patterns) and 3 lifting durations (1, 2 and 3 s/lift) were performed in the experiment. A total of 15 subjects were recruited. Electromyographic data were measured from 5 muscles of right upper limb. Hand forces were obtained at both handles, which were equipped with load cells. The results showed that the upper limb muscular strains increased when the load distribution of objects lifted was not balanced. The lifting durations had the significant effect on the biomechanical behavior of upper limbs. The risk of musculoskeletal disorders of upper limbs became higher when fast lifting was performed. The study results suggested that the center of mass should be located at the center of the load and the lifting duration should not be shorter to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injury to the operator.
- Harari, Y., Riemer, R., and Bechar, A. 2018. Factors determining workers' pace while conducting continuous sequential lifting, carrying, and lowering tasks. Applied Ergonomics, 67, 61--70.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lin, C. J., Wang, S. J., and Chen, H. J. 2006. A field evaluation method for assessing whole body biomechanical joint stress in manual lifting tasks. Industrial Health, 44(4), 604--612.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meyers, B. M., and Keir, P. J. 2003. Trunk muscle response to lifting unbalanced loads with and without knowledge of centre of mass. Clinical Biomechanics, 18(8), 712--720.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gilad, I., and Boughanim, D. 2002. Three-Dimensional Lifting Model For Non-Homogeneous Loads. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 8(4), 511--524.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen, Y. L., and Ho, T. K. 2016. Psychophysically determining the maximum acceptable weight of lift for polypropylene laminated bags. Industrial Health, 54(6), 550--553.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen, Y.-L., 2000. Changes in lifting dynamics after localized arm fatigue. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 25, 611--619.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen, H. C., Chen, C. Y., Lee, C. L., Wu, H. C., and Lou, S. Z., 2006. Data logging and analysis tools for worksite measurement of physical workload. In: 16th World Congress on Ergonomics, July 10--14, Maastricht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Lavender, S. A., Andersson, G. B., Schipplein, O. D., and Fuentes, H. J. 2003. The effects of initial lifting height, load magnitude, and lifting speed on the peak dynamic L5/S1 moments. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 31(1), 51--59.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oliveira, A. B., Silva, L. C., and Coury, H. J., 2011. How do low/high height and weight variation affect upper limb movements during manual material handling of industrial boxes? Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 15(6), 494--502.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Waters, T. R., Putz-Anderson, V., and Garg, A., 1994. Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.Google Scholar
- Lin, C. J., and Cheng, C. F., 2017. Lifting speed preferences and their effects on the maximal lifting capacity. Industrial Health, 55(1), 27--34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- De Looze, M. P. de, Kingma, I., Thunissen, W., Wijk, M. J. van, and Toussaint, H. M., 1994. The evaluation of a practical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities. Ergonomics, 37(9), 1495--1502.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lavender, S. A., Li, Y. C., Andersson, G. B. J., and Natarajan, R. N., 1999. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments. Ergonomics, 42(1), 111--125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang, E. M., Wang, M. -J., Yeh, W. -Y., Shih, Y. -C., and Lin, Y.-C., 1999. Development of anthropometric work environment for Taiwanese workers. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 23, 3--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hislop, H. J., Montgomery, J., Connelly, B., and Daniels, L., 1995. Daniels and Worthingham's Muscle testing: Techniques of manual examination. W.B. Saunders Co., MO, USA.Google Scholar
- Lavender, S.A., and Marras, W.S., 1990. An electromyographic analysis of an ergonomic intervention with the jackleg drill. Applied Ergonomics, 21(2), 90--100.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Agruss, C. D., Williams, K. R., and Fathallah, F. A., 2004. The effect of feedback training on lumbosacral compression during simulated occupational lifting. Ergonomics, 47(10), 1103--1115.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gundogdu, O., Anderson, K. S., and Parnianpour, M., 2005. Simulation of manual materials handling: Biomechanial assessment under different lifting conditions. Technology and Health Care-European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 13(1), 57--66.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernard, T. M., Ayoub, M. M., and Lin, C. J., 1999. Effects of speed of lift on static and inertial moments at the joints. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(1), 39--47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- De Looze, M. P., Boeken-Kruger, M. C., Steenhuizen, S., Baten, C. T. M., Kingma, I., and Van Dieën, J. H., 2000. Trunk muscle activation and low back loading in lifting in the absence of load knowledge. Ergonomics, 43(3), 333--344.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Load Distribution and Lifting Duration Effects on Upper Limb Strain for Manual Handling
Recommendations
Muscle Synergy Analysis on Upper Limb Movements of Human Arms
ICBBE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Biomedical and Bioinformatics EngineeringUpper limb movements of human arms are natural behaviors which require both the spatial and temporal coordination of multiple muscles. We now investigate how the neural strategy control upper limb movements in the human movement control. These upper ...
A phenomenological model for electrical stimulation of the upper limb
iCREATe '10: Proceedings of the 4th International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive TechnologyNeuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) reanimates the paralyzed limb by using electrical currents to stimulate the motor nerves to produce a muscle contraction. The resulting limb movement is difficult to control, as the relationship between ...
Active Multimodal Stimulation in Rehabilitation of paretic upper limb after stroke: technical procedure
TEEM 2017: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityThe development of non-invasive transcranial stimulation techniques and their influence in Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) rehabilitation is increasing since nineties. There are several treatments for sensitive and motor upper limb recovery after a ...
Comments