skip to main content
10.1145/3396743.3396796acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmsieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Ergonomic Design of Passenger Cabin for Public Utility Jeepney

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Public Utility Jeepney (PUJ) is one of the most popular and indispensable mode of public transport, and has been providing a practical means of transportation almost everywhere in the Philippines. Recently, there has been a decline in commuter's patronage of PUJs due to the fact that the jeepneys had not received any significant innovation since its introduction in the 50s and, also the decrease of service level attributed to the worsening traffic congestion, economic, socio cultural and the rise of much more convenient alternative mode of transportation such as Asian utility vehicles, buses and railway transport have contributed to the situation.

Nowadays, it's not enough for commuters to reach their intended destinations in a cheap and quick way; there are also some other qualitative factors that can affect how passengers experience traveling. The study was conducted to improve the existing jeepney passenger cabin design using ergonomic solutions by identifying ergonomic hazards and discomfort area of the passenger while riding the jeepney cabin. The findings of the study revealed that the current jeepney passenger cabin is poorly designed or lacking proper ergonomic application. And, the passengers were likely to experience discomfort and are at risk of injury as reflected in the RULA and REBA scores of the passengers. This was also corroborated by the survey and statistical analyses that were done in the study. The existing cabin dimension do not conform and match to the anthropometric measurements of Filipino passengers and thus, they were subjected to awkward postures and movements. Because of this, the authors were able to design an ergonomic passenger cabin for public utility jeepney by applying the pinciples of anthropometry and quality function deployment.

References

  1. Cascio, Wayne & Montealegre, Ramiro. (2016). How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 3. 349--375. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015--062352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Steiner, F., & Harmon, R. (2009). The impact of intangible value on the design and marketing of new products and services: An exploratory approach. PICMET 09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology. doi: 10.1109/picmet.2009.5261890Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Engineering Emotional Values in Product Design: Kansei (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277845481_Engineering_Emotional_Values_in_Product_Design_Kansei_Engineering_in_DevelopmentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Leder, H., & Carbon, C.-C. (2005). Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(5), 603--618. doi: 10.1002/acp.1088Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. KOVCH, I. M. R. E. (2017). Leadership and local power in european rural development. Place of publication not identified: ROUTLEDGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Annual Report 2014. Retrieved from https://www.jica.go.jp/english/publications/reports/annual/2014/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gkikas, N. (n.d.). Impact of Conversational Demand on Driver Distraction. Contemporary Ergonomics 2007, 115- 120. doi: 10.1201/9781315106595--18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gumasing, M.J.J., Zerrudo, M.O.V., & German, J.D. (2019). An Ergonomic Design of light Rail Transit (LRT) in the Philippines for Persons with Special Needs. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM), pp. 810--818Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gumasing, M. J. J., & Cruz, C. H. C. D. (2018). Ergonomic Design of Public Bus in The Philippines with Provision for Senior Citizens and Persons with Disability. MATEC Web of Conferences, 150, 05006. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201815005006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Silva, M. C. G. D. (2002). Measurements of comfort in vehicles. Measurement Science and Technology, 13(6). doi: 10.1088/0957--0233/13/6/201Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gumasing, M. J. J., & Sasot, Z. B. (2019). An Occupational Risk Analysis of Garbage Collection Tasks in the Philippines. 2019 IEEE 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA). doi: 10.1109/iea.2019.8715109Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gumasing, M.J.J., & Pacheco, M.E.G. (2018). Predictive Model on the Severity of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Accidents of truck Drivers in the Philippines. 2018 Proceedings of the International Conference on industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gumasing, M. J. J., Villapando, A. C., & Pernia, K. C. (2019). An Ergonomic Design of Wheelchair Bed Transfer for Post Stroke Patients. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering - MSIE 2019. doi: 10.1145/3335550.3339900Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gumasing, M.J.J., Villapando, A.C., & Siggaoat, C.D. (2019). An Ergonomic Design of Breastfeeding Chair for Filipino Mothers. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering - MSIE 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3335550.3339901Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Johannaber, K., & Fathallah, F. A. (2011). Disc Hydration Response to Simulated Stooped and Erect Postures. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 1017--1021. doi:10.1177/1071181311551212Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Pheasant, S., & Haslegrave, C. M. (2018). Principles and Practice of Anthropometrics. Bodyspace, 17--54. doi: 10.1201/9781315375212--2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Brinckmann, P., Biggemann, M., & Hilweg, D. (1988). Fatigue fracture of human lumbar vertebrae. Clinical Biomechanics, 3. doi: 10.1016/s0268--0033(88)80001--9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bhise, V. D. (2016). Ergonomics in the Automotive Design Process. doi: 10.1201/b11237Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An Ergonomic Design of Passenger Cabin for Public Utility Jeepney

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MSIE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering
      April 2020
      341 pages
      ISBN:9781450377065
      DOI:10.1145/3396743

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 May 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader