skip to main content
10.1145/3396851.3397727acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ORC: An Online Competitive Algorithm for Recommendation and Charging Schedule in Electric Vehicle Charging Network

Published:18 June 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

There is an increasing need for spatial and temporal schedule tailored to the requests and preferences of electric vehicles (EVs) in a network of charging stations. From the perspective of a charging network operator, this paper considers an online decision-making problem that recommends charging stations and the corresponding energy prices to sequential EV arrivals, and schedules the charging allocation to maximize the expected total revenue. To address the uncertainties from future EV arrivals and EVs' choices with respective to recommendations, we propose an Online Recommendation and Charging schedule algorithm (ORC) that is parameterized by a value function for customized designs. Under the competitive analysis framework, we provide a sufficient condition on the value function that can guarantee ORC to be online competitive. Moreover, we design a customized value function based on the sufficient conditions in an asymptotic case, and then rigorously prove the competitive ratio of ORC in the general case. Through extensive experiments, we show that ORC achieves significant increase of revenues compared to benchmark online algorithms.

References

  1. B. Alinia, M. H. Hajiesmaili, and N. Crespi. 2019. Online EV Charging Scheduling With On-Arrival Commitment. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 20, 12 (Dec 2019), 4524--4537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Alinia, M. H. Hajiesmaili, Z. J. Lee, N. Crespi, and E. Mallada. 2020. Online EV Scheduling Algorithms for Adaptive Charging Networks with Global Peak Constraints. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing (2020), 1--1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. B. Alinia, M. S. Talebi, M. H. Hajiesmaili, A. Yekkehkhany, and N. Crespi. 2018. Competitive Online Scheduling Algorithms with Applications in Deadline-Constrained EV Charging. In 2018 IEEE/ACM 26th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS). 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Alizadeh, H. Wai, M. Chowdhury, A. Goldsmith, A. Scaglione, and T. Javidi. 2017. Optimal Pricing to Manage Electric Vehicles in Coupled Power and Transportation Networks. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems 4, 4 (Dec 2017), 863--875.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Niv Buchbinder, Joseph Seffi Naor, et al. 2009. The design of competitive online algorithms via a primal-dual approach. Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science 3, 2--3 (2009), 93--263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. K. Clement-Nyns, E. Haesen, and J. Driesen. 2010. The Impact of Charging Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles on a Residential Distribution Grid. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 25, 1 (Feb 2010), 371--380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. L. Gan, U. Topcu, and S. H. Low. 2013. Optimal decentralized protocol for electric vehicle charging. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 28, 2 (May 2013), 940--951.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Negin Golrezaei, Hamid Nazerzadeh, and Paat Rusmevichientong. 2014. Real-Time Optimization of Personalized Assortments. Management Science 60, 6 (2014), 1532--1551.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L. Guo, K. F. Erliksson, and S. H. Low. 2017. Optimal online adaptive electric vehicle charging. In 2017 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. Guo, P. You, and Z. Yang. 2017. Recommendation of geographic distributed charging stations for electric vehicles: A game theoretical approach. In 2017 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhiyi Huang and Anthony Kim. 2019. Welfare maximization with production costs: A primal dual approach. Games and Economic Behavior 118 (2019), 648--667.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Will Ma and David Simchi-Levi. 2019. Algorithms for online matching, assortment, and pricing with tight weight-dependent competitive ratios. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.04770 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Moradipari and M. Alizadeh. 2020. Pricing and Routing Mechanisms for Differentiated Services in an Electric Vehicle Public Charging Station Network. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 11, 2 (2020), 1489--1499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sarah G. Nurre, Russell Bent, Feng Pan, and Thomas C. Sharkey. 2014. Managing operations of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) exchange stations for use with a smart grid. Energy Policy 67 (2014), 364--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. B. Sun, X. Tan, and D. H. K. Tsang. 2019. Eliciting Multi-Dimensional Flexibilities From Electric Vehicles: A Mechanism Design Approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 34, 5 (Sep. 2019), 4038--4047.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kalyan Talluri and Garrett Van Ryzin. 1998. An Analysis of Bid-Price Controls for Network Revenue Management. Manage. Sci. 44, 11 (Nov. 1998), 1577--1593.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. X. Tan, A. Leon-Garcia, Bo Sun, and D. H. K. Tsang. 2019. A Novel Online Mechanism for Demand-Side Flexibility Management under Arbitrary Arrivals. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems (Phoenix, AZ, USA) (e-Energy '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 391--392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. X. Tan, A. Leon-Garcia, Y. Wu, and D. H. K. Tsang. 2020. Online Combinatorial Auctions for Resource Allocation with Supply Costs and Capacity Limits. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (2020), 1--1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. W. Tang, S. Bi, and Y. J. Zhang. 2014. Online coordinated charging decision algorithm for electric vehicles without future information. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 5, 6 (Nov 2014), 2810--2824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Z. Tian, T. Jung, Y. Wang, F. Zhang, L. Tu, C. Xu, C. Tian, and X. Li. 2016. Real-Time Charging Station Recommendation System for Electric-Vehicle Taxis. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 17, 11 (Nov 2016), 3098--3109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. P. You, Z. Yang, Y. Zhang, S. H. Low, and Y. Sun. 2016. Optimal Charging Schedule for a Battery Switching Station Serving Electric Buses. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 31, 5 (Sep. 2016), 3473--3483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Xiaoxi Zhang, Zhiyi Huang, Chuan Wu, Zongpeng Li, and Francis C. M. Lau. 2017. Online Auctions in IaaS Clouds: Welfare and Profit Maximization With Server Costs. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 25, 2 (April 2017), 1034--1047.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Zhao, X. Lin, and M. Chen. 2015. Peak-minimizing online EV charging: Price-of-uncertainty and algorithm robustification. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM). 2335--2343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Zizhan Zheng and Ness Shroff. 2014. Online Welfare Maximization for Electric Vehicle Charging with Electricity Cost. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Future Energy Systems (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (e-Energy '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 253--263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Zhu, X. Liu, and X. Wang. 2018. Joint Transportation and Charging Scheduling in Public Vehicle Systems---A Game Theoretic Approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 19, 8 (Aug 2018), 2407--2419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. ORC: An Online Competitive Algorithm for Recommendation and Charging Schedule in Electric Vehicle Charging Network

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        e-Energy '20: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems
        June 2020
        601 pages
        ISBN:9781450380096
        DOI:10.1145/3396851

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 June 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        e-Energy '20 Paper Acceptance Rate77of173submissions,45%Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader