ABSTRACT
The conflict in Hong Kong in 2019 again emphasizes young people's trust in government is important. E-government is usually regarded as a tool to improve the levels of trust in government. With the development of Information and Communication Technology in China, social media becomes important channels to provide e-government services. This study investigates whether individual experiences of e-government use via social media can influence the levels of trust in government among young generation. The findings, which based on a survey of 1000 undergraduate students in Chongqing, offer support to a positive relationship between this e-government use via social media and public trust in government. Particularly, e-information service use via social media are linked with greater trust in government in competence and benevolence dimensions. On the other hand, e-transactional service use shows negative impacts on political trust. These results suggest that public sectors in China should improve the qualities of e-government services and create more services contents on social media platforms.
- Zhang, B., & Zhu, Y. 2020. Comparing attitudes towards adoption of e-government between urban users and rural users: An empirical study in Chongqing municipality, China. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1743361Google Scholar
- Bannister, F. & Connolly, R. 2011. The trouble with transparency: a critical review of openness in e-government. Policy & Internet, 3(1), 1-30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brewer, G. A., Neubauer, B.J., & Geiselhart, K. 2006. Designing and implementing e-government system critical implication for public administration and democracy. Administration and Society, 38(4), 472-499.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morgeson, F. V., VanAmburg, D., & Mithas, S. 2011. Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 257-283.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Park, M. J., Choi, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. 2015. Trust in government's social media service and citizens’ patronage behavior. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 629-641.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhu, Y., & Kou, G. 2019. Linking Smart Governance to Future Generation: A Study on the Use of Local E-government Service among Undergraduate Students in a Chinese Municipality. Informatics, 6, 45.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yang, Y. 2017. Towards a New Digital Era: Observing Local E-Government Services Adoption in a Chinese Municipality. Future Internet. 9, 53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carter, L., & Belanger, F. 2005. The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal. 15(1), 5–25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yang, K., & Holzer, M. 2006. The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114-126.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grimes, M. 2008. Consent, political trust and compliance: rejoinder to Kaina's remarks on organizing consent. European Journal of Political Research, 47(4), 522-535.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fukuyama, F. 1995. Social capital and the global economy: A redrawn map of the world. Foreign affairs, 74(5), 89-103.Google Scholar
- Abramson, Paul R. 1983. Political attitudes in America: Formation and changes. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Porumbescu, G. 2016. Linking public sector social media and e-government website use to trust in government. Government Information Quarterly. 33(2), 291-304.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hetherington, M. J. 1998. The political relevance of political trust. The American Political Science Review, 791-838.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Levi, M., & Stoker, L. 2000. Political trust and trust worthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475-507.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kamar, C. 2002. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information System Research, 13(3), 334-359.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, S. E. 2005. The role of trust in the modern administrative state and an integrative model. Administration and Society, 37(5), 611-635.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. 2012. Researching news discussion on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), 801-814.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ceron, A. 2015. Internet, news, and political trust: The difference between social media and online media outlets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 487-503.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hong, H. 2013. Government websites and social media's influence on government- public relationships. Public Relations Review. 39(4), 346–356.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alawneh, A., Al-Refai, H., & Batiha, K. 2013. Measuring user satisfaction from e-government services: Lessons from Jordan. Gov. Inf. Q, 30, 277-288.Google ScholarCross Ref
- West, D.M. 2004. e-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review. 64(1), 15–27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nam, T. 2012. Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly. 29(1), 12–20.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nam, T. 2014. Determining the type of e-government use. Government Information Quarterly. 31(2), 211-220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Becker J., Niehaves B., Bergener P. & Räckers M. 2008. Digital Divide in eGovernment: The eInclusion Gap Model. In: Wimmer M.A., Scholl H.J., Ferro E. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol 5184, pp. 231-242, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogers, E. 1995. Diffusion of innovations (4 th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-339.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. & Davis, F.D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Choudrie, J. & Dwivedi, Y. 2005. A Survey of Citizens Adoption and Awareness of E-Government Initiatives, the Government Gateway: A United Kingdom Perspective; E-Government Workshop; Brunel University: London, UK, 2005.Google Scholar
- Curtis, L., Edwards, C., Fraser, K.L., Gudelsky, S., Holmquist, J., Thornton, K.& Sweetser, K.D. 2010. Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relat. Rev.36, 90–92.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Using social media to increase e-government adoption in developing countries
ICEGOV '11: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceE-government can be a useful tool for governments to improve relationships with their citizens. However, citizen trust in government and the Internet technology is necessary for broad adoption of e-government. Using a survey, this study examines the ...
Trust in government's social media service and citizen's patronage behavior
We investigate trust in government social media and expansion in citizen patronage.We utilize a structural equation model and sample from Korean Facebook uses.Process and characteristic-based trust effect positively on government trust by social ...
How does e-government use affect citizens’ trust in government? Empirical evidence from China
AbstractAlthough much literature has discussed the potential of e-government for improving citizens’ trust in government, the question of how e-government use affects citizens’ trust in government remains underexplored. To investigate the ...
Comments