skip to main content
10.1145/3396956.3398250acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

E-government use via social media as a tool to influences young people's trust in government: An empirical study in a Chinese Municipality

Published:16 June 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The conflict in Hong Kong in 2019 again emphasizes young people's trust in government is important. E-government is usually regarded as a tool to improve the levels of trust in government. With the development of Information and Communication Technology in China, social media becomes important channels to provide e-government services. This study investigates whether individual experiences of e-government use via social media can influence the levels of trust in government among young generation. The findings, which based on a survey of 1000 undergraduate students in Chongqing, offer support to a positive relationship between this e-government use via social media and public trust in government. Particularly, e-information service use via social media are linked with greater trust in government in competence and benevolence dimensions. On the other hand, e-transactional service use shows negative impacts on political trust. These results suggest that public sectors in China should improve the qualities of e-government services and create more services contents on social media platforms.

References

  1. Zhang, B., & Zhu, Y. 2020. Comparing attitudes towards adoption of e-government between urban users and rural users: An empirical study in Chongqing municipality, China. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1743361Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bannister, F. & Connolly, R. 2011. The trouble with transparency: a critical review of openness in e-government. Policy & Internet, 3(1), 1-30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Brewer, G. A., Neubauer, B.J., & Geiselhart, K. 2006. Designing and implementing e-government system critical implication for public administration and democracy. Administration and Society, 38(4), 472-499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Morgeson, F. V., VanAmburg, D., & Mithas, S. 2011. Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 257-283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Park, M. J., Choi, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. 2015. Trust in government's social media service and citizens’ patronage behavior. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 629-641.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Zhu, Y., & Kou, G. 2019. Linking Smart Governance to Future Generation: A Study on the Use of Local E-government Service among Undergraduate Students in a Chinese Municipality. Informatics, 6, 45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Yang, Y. 2017. Towards a New Digital Era: Observing Local E-Government Services Adoption in a Chinese Municipality. Future Internet. 9, 53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Carter, L., & Belanger, F. 2005. The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal. 15(1), 5–25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Yang, K., & Holzer, M. 2006. The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114-126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Grimes, M. 2008. Consent, political trust and compliance: rejoinder to Kaina's remarks on organizing consent. European Journal of Political Research, 47(4), 522-535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Fukuyama, F. 1995. Social capital and the global economy: A redrawn map of the world. Foreign affairs, 74(5), 89-103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Abramson, Paul R. 1983. Political attitudes in America: Formation and changes. San Francisco: Freeman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Porumbescu, G. 2016. Linking public sector social media and e-government website use to trust in government. Government Information Quarterly. 33(2), 291-304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hetherington, M. J. 1998. The political relevance of political trust. The American Political Science Review, 791-838.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Levi, M., & Stoker, L. 2000. Political trust and trust worthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475-507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kamar, C. 2002. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information System Research, 13(3), 334-359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kim, S. E. 2005. The role of trust in the modern administrative state and an integrative model. Administration and Society, 37(5), 611-635.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. 2012. Researching news discussion on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), 801-814.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ceron, A. 2015. Internet, news, and political trust: The difference between social media and online media outlets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 487-503.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hong, H. 2013. Government websites and social media's influence on government- public relationships. Public Relations Review. 39(4), 346–356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Alawneh, A., Al-Refai, H., & Batiha, K. 2013. Measuring user satisfaction from e-government services: Lessons from Jordan. Gov. Inf. Q, 30, 277-288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. West, D.M. 2004. e-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review. 64(1), 15–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Nam, T. 2012. Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly. 29(1), 12–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Nam, T. 2014. Determining the type of e-government use. Government Information Quarterly. 31(2), 211-220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Becker J., Niehaves B., Bergener P. & Räckers M. 2008. Digital Divide in eGovernment: The eInclusion Gap Model. In: Wimmer M.A., Scholl H.J., Ferro E. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol 5184, pp. 231-242, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rogers, E. 1995. Diffusion of innovations (4 th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. & Davis, F.D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Choudrie, J. & Dwivedi, Y. 2005. A Survey of Citizens Adoption and Awareness of E-Government Initiatives, the Government Gateway: A United Kingdom Perspective; E-Government Workshop; Brunel University: London, UK, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Curtis, L., Edwards, C., Fraser, K.L., Gudelsky, S., Holmquist, J., Thornton, K.& Sweetser, K.D. 2010. Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relat. Rev.36, 90–92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    dg.o '20: The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
    June 2020
    389 pages
    ISBN:9781450387910
    DOI:10.1145/3396956

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 16 June 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format