skip to main content
10.1145/3397166.3409138acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

TCCI: taming co-channel interference for wireless lans

Published:11 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Co-channel interference is a fundamental issue in wireless local area networks (WLANs). Although many results have been developed to handle co-channel interference for concurrent transmission, most of them require network-wide fine-grained synchronization and data sharing among access points (APs). Such luxuries, however, are not affordable in many WLANs due to their hardware limitation and data privacy concern. In this paper, we present TCCI, a co-channel interference management scheme to enable concurrent transmission in WLANs. TCCI requires neither network-wide fine-grained synchronization nor inter-network data sharing, and therefore is amenable to real-world implementation. The enabler of TCCI is a new detection and beamforming method for an AP, which is capable of taming unknown interference by leveraging its multiple antennas. We have built a prototype of TCCI on a wireless testbed and demonstrated its compatibility with commercial Atheros 802.11 devices. Our experimental results show that TCCI allows co-located APs to serve their users simultaneously and achieves up to 113% throughput gain compared to existing interference-avoidance protocol.

References

  1. Fadel Adib, Swarun Kumar, Omid Aryan, Shyamnath Gollakota, and Dina Katabi. 2013. Interference alignment by motion. In Proc. of ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing & Networking (MobiCom). 279--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Maria Antonieta Alvarez and Umberto Spagnolini. 2018. Distributed time and carrier frequency synchronization for dense wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks 4, 4 (2018), 683--696.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Horia Vlad Balan, Ryan Rogalin, Antonios Michaloliakos, Konstantinos Psounis, and Giuseppe Caire. 2012. Achieving high data rates in a distributed MIMO system. In Proc. of ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing & Networking (MobiCom). 41--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Giuseppe Bianchi, Luigi Fratta, and Matteo Oliveri. 1996. Performance evaluation and enhancement of the CSMA/CA MAC protocol for 802.11 wireless LANs. In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Communications (PIMRC), Vol. 2. 392--396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Zhe Chen, Xu Zhang, Sulei Wang, Yuedong Xu, Jie Xiong, and Xin Wang. 2017. BUSH: Empowering large-scale MU-MIMO in WLANs with hybrid beamforming. In Proc. of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Robson Costa, Jim Lau, Paulo Portugal, Francisco Vasques, and Ricardo Moraes. 2019. Handling real-time communication in infrastructured IEEE 802.11 wireless networks: The RT-WiFi approach. Journal of Communications and Networks 99 (2019), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Robson Costa, Paulo Portugal, Francisco Vasques, and Ricardo Moraes. 2010. A TDMA-based mechanism for real-time communication in IEEE 802.11 e networks. In Proc. of IEEE 15th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2010). 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Der-Jiunn Deng, Ying-Pei Lin, Xun Yang, Jun Zhu, Yun-Bo Li, Jun Luo, and Kwang-Cheng Chen. 2017. IEEE 802.11 ax: Highly efficient WLANs for intelligent information infrastructure. IEEE Communications Magazine 55, 12 (2017), 52--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Petar Djukic and Prasant Mohapatra. 2009. Soft-TDMAC: A software TDMA-based MAC over commodity 802.11 hardware. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM. 1836--1844.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Petar Djukic and Shahrokh Valaee. 2009. Delay aware link scheduling for multihop TDMA wireless networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 17, 3 (2009), 870--883.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Shyamnath Gollakota, Fadel Adib, Dina Katabi, and Srinivasan Seshan. 2011. Clearing the RF smog: making 802.11 n robust to cross-technology interference. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 41. 170--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Shyamnath Gollakota and Dina Katabi. 2008. Zigzag decoding: Combating hidden terminals in wireless networks. Vol. 38. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shyamnath Gollakota, Samuel David Perli, and Dina Katabi. 2009. Interference alignment and cancellation. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 39. 159--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Malik Muhammad Usman Gul, Xiaoli Ma, and Sungeun Lee. 2014. Timing and frequency synchronization for OFDM downlink transmissions using Zadoff-Chu sequences. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 14, 3 (2014), 1716--1729.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ezzeldin Hamed, Hariharan Rahul, Mohammed A Abdelghany, and Dina Katabi. 2016. Real-time distributed MIMO systems. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Conference. 412--425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ezzeldin Hamed, Hariharan Rahul, and Bahar Partov. 2018. Chorus: Truly distributed distributed-MIMO. In Proc. of ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication. 461--475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yao-Win Hong and Anna Scaglione. 2005. A scalable synchronization protocol for large scale sensor networks and its applications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 23, 5 (2005), 1085--1099.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. IEEE 802.11ac. 2014. IEEE Standard for Information technology Local and metropolitan area networks Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 5: Enhancements for Higher Throughput. IEEE Standards 802.11ac (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sachin Katti, Shyamnath Gollakota, and Dina Katabi. 2007. Embracing wireless interference: Analog network coding. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 37. 397--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ruizhi Liao, Boris Bellalta, Miquel Oliver, and Zhisheng Niu. 2014. MU-MIMO MAC protocols for wireless local area networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 18, 1 (2014), 162--183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Shangjuan Lin, Hang Qi, Xiangming Wen, Zhaoming Lu, and Zhiqun Hu. 2018. An Efficient Group-Based OFDMA MAC Protocol for Multiuser Access in Dense WLAN Systems. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ali A Nasir, Hani Mehrpouyan, Steven D Blostein, Salman Durrani, and Rodney A Kennedy. 2011. Timing and carrier synchronization with channel estimation in multi-relay cooperative networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 60, 2 (2011), 793--811.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Xiaoqi Qin, Xu Yuan, Zhi Zhang, Feng Tian, Thomas Hou, and Wenjing Lou. 2019. Joint User-AP Association and Resource Allocation in Multi-AP 60 GHz WLAN. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Qualcomm Atheros. 2019. AR9271 Highly integrated single-chip USB with 802.11n support. www.ath-drivers.eu/qualcomm-atheros-datasheets-for-AR9271.html [Online; accessed 28-Jul-2019] (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Qualcomm Atheros. 2019. open-ath9k-htc-firmware. https://github.com/vanhoefm/modwifi-ath9k-htc [Online; accessed 28-Jul-2019] (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hariharan Rahul, Haitham Hassanieh, and Dina Katabi. 2011. SourceSync: A distributed wireless architecture for exploiting sender diversity. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 41, 4 (2011), 171--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hariharan Shankar Rahul, Swarun Kumar, and Dina Katabi. 2012. JMB: Scaling wireless capacity with user demands. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM. 235--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Clayton Shepard, Hang Yu, Narendra Anand, Erran Li, Thomas Marzetta, Richard Yang, and Lin Zhong. 2012. Argos: Practical many-antenna base stations. In Proc. of ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom). 53--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Teng Wei and Xinyu Zhang. 2016. Random access signaling for network MIMO uplink. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM). 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Wireless Systems Laboratory. 2019. Co-channel Interference Management. https://https://github.com/wsl216/cochnlnterference [Online; accessed 13-Dec-2019] (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wireshark Organization. 2019. Wireshark Go Deep. Available at: available at https://www.wireshark.org/ [Online; accessed 31- Jul- 2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhice Yang, Jiansong Zhang, Kun Tan, Qian Zhang, and Yongguang Zhang. 2015. Enabling TDMA for today's wireless LANs. In IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM). 1436--1444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Junmei Yao, Jun Xu, Sheng Luo, Lu Wang, Chao Yang, Kaishun Wu, and Wei Lou. 2019. Comprehensive Study on MIMO-related Interference Management in WLANs. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Yunze Zeng, Ioannis Pefkianakis, Kyu-Han Kim, and Prasant Mohapatra. 2017. MU-MIMO-Aware AP selection for 802.11ac networks. In Proc. of ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Xinyu Zhang and Kang G Shin. 2011. Delay-optimal broadcast for multihop wireless networks using self-interference cancellation. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 12, 1 (2011), 7--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Xinyu Zhang, Karthikeyan Sundaresan, Mohammad A Amir Khojastepour, Sampath Rangarajan, and Kang G Shin. 2013. NEMOx: Scalable network MIMO for wireless networks. In Proc. of ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom). 453--464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Anfu Zhou, Teng Wei, Xinyu Zhang, Min Liu, and Zhongcheng Li. 2015. Signpost: Scalable MU-MIMO signaling with zero CSI feedback. In Proc. of ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). 327--336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yulong Zou, Jia Zhu, Xianbin Wang, and Lajos Hanzo. 2016. A survey on wireless security: Technical challenges, recent advances, and future trends. Proc. IEEE 104, 9 (2016), 1727--1765.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. TCCI: taming co-channel interference for wireless lans

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        Mobihoc '20: Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Symposium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, and Protocol Design for Mobile Networks and Mobile Computing
        October 2020
        384 pages
        ISBN:9781450380157
        DOI:10.1145/3397166

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 October 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate296of1,843submissions,16%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)40
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader