skip to main content
10.1145/3397536.3422254acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Geocoding Framework Powered by Delivery Data

Published:13 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over the last decade, India has witnessed an explosion in the ecommerce industry. There is increasing adoption of e-commerce in smaller towns and cities over and above the densely populated urban centers. In this paper, we discuss the practical challenges involved with developing high-precision geocoding engines for these geographical regions in India. These challenges motivate the next iteration of our geocoding framework. In particular, we focus on addressing three core areas of improvement: 1) leveraging customer delivery data for geocoding, 2) understanding and solving for the diversity and variations in addresses for these new regions, and 3) overcoming the limited coverage of our reference corpus. To this end, we present GeoCloud. Key contributions of GeoCloud are 1) a training algorithm for learning reference-representations from delivery coordinates and 2) a retrieval algorithm for geocoding new addresses. We perform extensive testing of GeoCloud across India to capture the regional, socio-economical and linguistic diversity of our country. Our evaluation data is sampled from 72 cities and 21 states from the delivery addresses of a large e-commerce platform in India. The results show a significant improvement in precision and recall over the state-of-the-art geocoding system for India, and demonstrate the effectiveness of our intuitive, robust and generic approach. While we have shown the effectiveness of the framework for Indian addresses, we believe the framework can be applied to other countries as well, particularly where addresses are unstructured. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first instance of geocoding by learning reference-representations from large-scale delivery data.

References

  1. T. Ravindra Babu, Abhranil Chatterjee, Shivram Khandeparker, A. Vamsi Subhash, and Sawan Gupta. 2015. Geographical Address Classification without Using Geolocation Coordinates. In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval (Paris, France) (GIR '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2837689.2837696 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Pavel Berkhin, Michael R. Evans, Florin Teodorescu, Wei Wu, and Dragomir Yankov. 2015. A New Approach to Geocoding: BingGC. In Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (Seattle, Washington) (SIGSPATIAL '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2820783.2820827 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kalaari Capital. 2017. Kalaari-KStart - Internet Growth in India. http://kstart.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/India_Internet_Report_2017.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Abhranil Chatterjee, Janit Anjaria, Sourav Roy, Arnab Ganguli, and Krishanu Seal. 2016. SAGEL: Smart Address Geocoding Engine for Supply-Chain Logistics. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (Burlingame, California) (SIGSPACIAL '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 42, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2996913.2996917 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. DescriptionPricewaterhouseCoopers. 2014. PWC e-Commerce Growth Report for 2014. https://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/publications/2015/ecommerce-in-india-accelerating- growth.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ernst and Young. 2017. EY Growth Report, 2017. https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-indias-growth-paradigm/$FILE/ey- indias- growth-paradigm.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Martin Ester, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Jörg Sander, and Xiaowei Xu. 1996. A Density-based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters a Density-based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Portland, Oregon) (KDD'96). AAAI Press, 226--231. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3001460.3001507 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Indian Brand Equity Foundation. 2018. IBEF e-Commerce Review 2018. https://www.ibef.org/download/Ecommerce-February-20181.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wolf Garbe. 2019. Sym Spell Compound. https://github.com/wolfgarbe/SymSpellGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. GeoNames. 2017. GeoNames Geographical Database. http://www.geonames.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gisgraphy. 2020. Gisgraphy World Geocoding. http://www.gisgraphy.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniel W Goldberg. 2008. A geocoding best practices guide. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Daniel W Goldberg. 2011. Improving Geocoding Match Rates with Spatially-Varying Block Metrics. Transactions in GIS 15, 6 (2011), 829--850.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Daniel W Goldberg, John P Wilson, and Craig A Knoblock. 2007. From text to geographic coordinates: the current state of geocoding. URISA-WASHINGTON DC- 19, 1 (2007), 33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Chandigarh Government. 2018. Interactive Map of Chandigarh. http://chandigarh.gov.in/knowchd_map.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Komoot. 2020. Photon. https://github.com/komoot/photonGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. MapQuest. 2020. MapQuest Developer Network. https://developer.mapquest.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Office of the Registrar General and India Census Commissioner. 2001. Census Data 2001, India at a glance. https://www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/India_at_glance/glance.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. OpenStreetMap. 2020. Nominatim Opensource Search. https://github.com/twain47/NominatimGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. OpenStreetMap. 2020. OpenStreetMap Nominatim. http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Google Maps Platform. 2020. Google Maps Geocoding API. https://developers.google.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sina Rashidian, Xinyu Dong, Amogh Avadhani, Prachi Poddar, and Fusheng Wang. 2017. Effective Scalable and Integrative Geocoding for Massive Address Datasets. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (Redondo Beach, CA, USA) (SIGSPATIAL '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 26, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139958.3139986 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. RedSeer. 2018. RedSeer 2018 e-Tailing Perspective. http://redseer.com/reports/e-tailing-in-india-redseer-perspective/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Anil Kumar Singh. 2006. A Computational Phonetic Model for Indian Language Scripts. In Proceedings of Constraints on Spelling Changes: Fifth International Workshop on Writing Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Here Technologies. 2020. HERE Geocoder API. https://developer.here.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Duck-Hye Yang, Lucy Mackey Bilaver, Oscar Hayes, and Robert Goerge. 2004. Improving geocoding practices: evaluation of geocoding tools. Journal of medical systems 28, 4 (2004), 361--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Paul A Zandbergen. 2009. Geocoding quality and implications for spatial analysis. Geography Compass 3, 2 (2009), 647--680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Geocoding Framework Powered by Delivery Data

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGSPATIAL '20: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
          November 2020
          687 pages
          ISBN:9781450380195
          DOI:10.1145/3397536

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 November 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader