skip to main content
10.1145/3400302.3415616acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccadConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Symbolic uniform sampling with XOR circuits

Published:17 December 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Uniform sampling is an important method in statistics and has various applications in model counting, system verification, algorithm design, among others. Symbolic sampling in a Boolean space is a recently proposed technique that combines sampling and symbolic representation for effective Boolean reasoning. Under the framework of symbolic sampling, we propose a method to construct compact XOR circuits achieving uniform sampling in a given Boolean space. The method is further extended to biased sampling within a focused subspace of interest. Experimental results show the effectiveness of compact sampling circuit generation and its potential to facilitate Boolean reasoning.

References

  1. M. Bellare, O. Goldreich, and E. Petrank. 2000. Uniform Generation of NP-Witnesses Using an NP-Oracle. Information and Computation 163 (12 2000), 510--526.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Brayton and A. Mishchenko. 2010. ABC: An Academic Industrial-Strength Verification Tool. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV). 24--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Chakraborty, D. Fremont, K. Meel, S. Seshia, and M. Vardi. 2015. On Parallel Scalable Uniform SAT Witness Generation. In Proceedings of International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS). 304--319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Chakraborty, K. Meel, and M. Vardi. 2013. A Scalable and Nearly Uniform Generator of SAT Witnesses. In Proceedings of International Conerence on Computer Aided Verification (CAV). 608--623.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Chakraborty, K. Meel, and M. Vardi. 2013. A Scalable Approximate Model Counter. In Proceedings of International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP). 200--216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Chakraborty, K. Meel, and M. Vardi. 2014. Balancing Scalability and Uniformity in SAT Witness Generator. In Proceedings of Design Automation Conference (DAC). 60:1--60:6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. A. Fisher. 1992. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. In Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution, Samuel Kotz and Norman L. Johnson (Eds.). Springer New York, 66--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Gentle. 2003. Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods. Springer New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. Gomes, A. Sabharwal, and B. Selman. 2006. Model Counting: A New Strategy for Obtaining Good Bounds.. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). 54--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. C. Gomes and B. Selman. 2006. Near-Uniform Sampling of Combinatorial Spaces Using XOR Constraints. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). 481--488.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C.-S Han and J.-H R. Jiang. 2012. When Boolean Satisfiability Meets Gaussian Elimination in a Simplex Way. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV). 410--426.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Jerrum, L. Valiant, and V. Vazirani. 1986. Random Generation of Combinatorial Structures from a Uniform Distribution. Theoretical Computer Science 43 (12 1986), 169--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. V. N. Kravets, J.-H. R. Jiang, and H. Riener. 2020. Learning to Automate the Design Updates From Observed Engineering Changes in the Chip Development Cycle. In Proceedings of Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE). 738--743.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. V. N. Kravets, N.-Z. Lee, and J.-H. R. Jiang. 2019. Comprehensive Search for ECO Rectification Using Symbolic Sampling. In Proceedings of Design Automation Conference (DAC). 71:1--71:6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Pearson. 1992. On the Criterion that a Given System of Deviations from the Probable in the Case of a Correlated System of Variables is Such that it Can be Reasonably Supposed to have Arisen from Random Sampling. In Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution, Samuel Kotz and Norman L. Johnson (Eds.). Springer New York, 11--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. P. Schmidt, A. Siegel, and A. Srinivasan. 1995. Chernoff-Hoeffding Bounds for Applications with Limited Independence. SIAM J. Discret. Math. 8, 2 (1995), 223--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Sipser. 1983. A complexity theoretic approach to randomness. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). 330--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. F. Somenzi. 2005. CUDD: CU Decision Diagram Package (release 2.4.1). University of Colorado at Boulder (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ICCAD '20: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Computer-Aided Design
    November 2020
    1396 pages
    ISBN:9781450380263
    DOI:10.1145/3400302
    • General Chair:
    • Yuan Xie

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 17 December 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate457of1,762submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

    ICCAD '24
    IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design
    October 27 - 31, 2024
    New York , NY , USA
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader