skip to main content
10.1145/3400934.3400954acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Stuck Pipe Prediction in Geothermal Well Drilling at Darajat Using Statistical and Machine Learning Application

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 August 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Stuck pipe during Geothermal well drilling is one of the problems that affect non-productive time (NPT) which prolong the drilling schedule. This problem directly increases drilling cost due to increasing overall drilling time, consumables, mud, drill bit and as well as sacrifices its well when there is no more progress to reach the targeted reservoir depth. Also the stuck pipe problem will create a domino effect that might impact next well drilling and another site drilling schedule. Stuck pipe problem is made from many contributor factors and also related to other problem cases such as lost circulation, wellbore instability, temporary zone closure, and cementing job trouble. The current analytical method mostly uses one or two dominant variables to predict stuck pipe problems which limitedly represents drilling conditions, lithology and wellbore conditions. A combination of statistical method and machine learning approach is developed and comprehensively used to predict stuck pipe problem that represents different well lithology, wellbore and drilling condition. Historical data that represents the conditional situation and electronic data recorder is used to predict the stuck pipe problem which different for each of the well. Many factors contribute to successful drilling activities and no one single factor, which dominantly becomes the root cause of the problem. A statistical approach such as principal component analysis, logistic regression and discriminant analysis is very helpful to interpret data before the next step of the analysis. Those statistical analyses should be the baseline of data interpretation before creating an algorithm to use predictive analysis using machine learning and deep learning.

References

  1. Nugroho Agung Pambudi. 2018. Geothermal power generation in Indonesia, a country within the ring of fire: Current status, future development and policy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81, July 2017: 2893--2901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.096Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Austin Anderson and Behnaz Rezaie. 2019. Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future. Applied Energy 248, April: 18--34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.102Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Rindu G. Intani, Glenn U. Golla, Yunia Syaffitri, Hanna M. Paramitasari, Gregg A. Nordquist, Chris Nelson, Ginanjar, Gede K.D.S. Giri, and Arias Sugandhi. 2020. Improving the conceptual understanding of the Darajat Geothermal Field. Geothermics 83, December 2018: 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2019.101716Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. James Stimac, Gregg Nordquist, Aquardi Suminar, and Lutfhie Sirad-Azwar. 2008. An overview of the Awibengkok geothermal system, Indonesia. Geothermics 37, 3: 300--331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2008.04.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Chad Augustine, Jefferson W. Tester, Brian Anderson, and Susan Petty. 2006. A Comparison of Geothermal with Oil and Gas Well Drilling Costs. Thirty-First Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering: 15. Retrieved from https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/IGAstandard/record_detail.php?id=3082Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kent Salminen, Curtis Cheatham, Mark Smith, Khaydar Valiulin, Root Causes, Best Practices, and Company Task Forces. 2016. Stuck Pipe Prediction Using Automated Real-Time Modeling and Data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. John Finger and Doug Blankenship. 2010. Handbook of Best Practices for Geothermal Drilling. Sandia Report (SAND2010-6048). ..., December: 84, Figure 2. Retrieved from http://artikel-software.com/file/geothermal drilling handbook.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Trina Y. Du. 2019. Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Visualizing Morphometric Data: Comparing Principal Component Analysis to Nonlinear Methods. Evolutionary Biology 46, 1: 106--121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-018-9464-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Eric McKinney, Minwoo Chang, Marc Maguire, and Yan Sun. 2019. Prediction of Stress Increase at Ultimate in Unbonded Tendons Using Sparse Principal Component Analysis. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials 13, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-019-0339-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Anders Willersrud, Mogens Blanke, Lars Imsland, and Alexey Pavlov. 2015. Drillstring Washout Diagnosis Using Friction Estimation and Statistical Change Detection. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 23, 5: 1886--1900. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2015.2394243Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lianzhong Sun and Deli Gao. 2011. A numerical method for determining the stuck point in extended reach drilling. Petroleum Science 8, 3: 345--352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-011-0151-zGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jun Li, Miao He, Hui Zhang, Gonghui Liu, and Tengfei Sun. 2017. Numerical Model for Evaluating Well Kick and Lost Circulation During Managed Pressure Drilling. Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils 53, 4: 557--568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-017-0836-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Hicham Ferroudji, Ahmed Hadjadj, Ahmed Haddad, and Titus Ntow Ofei. 2019. Numerical study of parameters affecting pressure drop of power-law fluid in horizontal annulus for laminar and turbulent flows. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-0706-xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Khaled Al-Azani, Salaheldin Elkatatny, Abdulwahab Ali, Emad Ramadan, and Abdulazeez Abdulraheem. 2019. Cutting concentration prediction in horizontal and deviated wells using artificial intelligence techniques. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-0672-3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Stuck Pipe Prediction in Geothermal Well Drilling at Darajat Using Statistical and Machine Learning Application

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      APCORISE '20: Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
      June 2020
      410 pages
      ISBN:9781450376006
      DOI:10.1145/3400934

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 August 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      APCORISE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader