skip to main content
10.1145/3400934.3400959acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Model Conceptualization of Battery Swapping Industry Development Using System Dynamics

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 August 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Government of Indonesia (GOI) has targeted the commercialization of the electric motorcycle as an attempt to reduce Greenhouse Gases (GHG) emissions. However, there are several impediments such as the short mileage, the long charging time, and the costly purchase price that must be addressed before the mass-scale adoption of the electric motorcycle. A battery swapping scheme has appeared to offer a solution for the prior impediments. However, battery swapping development is a complex system that needs a holistic view in order to understand the system structure and causal relationship between elements. This study aims to develop a conceptual model of how a profitable battery swapping industry is developed, using system dynamics modeling. Through a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) and a system diagram, the conceptual model shows that the potential user of electric motorcycle and the battery swapping capacity are the key variables that give a significant impact on the battery swapping industry profitability.

References

  1. Permadi, D.A., A. Sofyan, and N.T. Kim Oanh. 2017. Assessment of emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants in Indonesia and impacts of national policy for elimination of kerosene use in cooking. Atmospheric Environment. 154: p. 82--94Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Setiawan, I.C., Indarto, and Deendarlianto. 2019. System Dynamics Modeling of Indonesia Road Transportation Energy Demand and Scenario Analysis to achieve National Energy Policy Target. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 546: p. 52070.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Adegbohun, F., A. von Jouanne, and K. Lee. 2019. Autonomous Battery Swapping System and Methodologies of Electric Vehicles. Energies. 12(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Amiri, S.S., S. Jadid, and H. Saboori. 2018. Multi-objective optimum charging management of electric vehicles through battery swapping stations. Energy. 165: p. 549--562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Infante, W., J. Ma, and A. Liebman. 2018. Operational strategy analysis of electric vehicle battery swapping stations. IET Electrical Systems in Transportation. 8(2): p. 130--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lidicker, J., T. Lipman, and B. Williams. 2011. Business Model for Subscription Service for Electric Vehicles Including Battery Swapping, for San Francisco Bay Area, California. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2252(1): p. 83--90Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mak, H.-Y., Y. Rong, and Z.-J.M. Shen. 2013. Infrastructure Planning for Electric Vehicles with Battery Swapping. Management Science. 59(7): p. 1557--1575.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Nie, Y. and M. Ghamami. 2013. A corridor-centric approach to planning electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part B. 57: p. 172--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Sarker, M.R., H. Pandzic, and M.A. Ortega-Vazquez. Electric vehicle battery swapping station: Business case and optimization model. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sarker, M.R., H. Pandzic, and M.A. Ortega-Vazquez. 2015. Optimal Operation and Services Scheduling for an Electric Vehicle Battery Swapping Station. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 30(2): p. 901--910.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Wu, H., et al. 2018. An Optimization Model for Electric Vehicle Battery Charging at a Battery Swapping Station. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 67(2): p. 881--895.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Zhang, X. and R. Rao. 2016. A Benefit Analysis of Electric Vehicle Battery Swapping and Leasing Modes in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 52(6): p. 1414--1426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Langbroek, J.H.M., et al. 2016. The effect of policy incentives on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy. 94: p. 94--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Rietmann, N. and T. Lieven. 2019. How policy measures succeeded to promote electric mobility - Worldwide review and outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production. 206: p. 66--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Liu, X., et al. 2019. Distributed Operation Management of Battery Swapping-Charging Systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 10(5): p. 5320--5333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Yang, S., et al. 2014. Dynamic operation model of the battery swapping station for EV (electric vehicle) in electricity market. Energy. 65: p. 544--549.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Zhang, L., et al. 2019 Demand-Side Management Optimization in Electric Vehicles Battery Swapping Service. IEEE Access. 7: p. 95224--95232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Presidential Regulation Number 55 of 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Syamnur, F.H., et al. 2019. Barriers to the adoption, acceptance and public perceptions of Electric Vehicles (EV) in Indonesia: Case studies in the city of Surakarta. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Li, W., et al. 2017. A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 78: p. 318--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Neubauer, J., A. Brooker, and E. Wood. 2012. Sensitivity of battery electric vehicle economics to drive patterns, vehicle range, and charge strategies. Journal of Power Sources. 209: p. 269--277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Bonges, H.A. and A.C. Lusk. 2016. Addressing electric vehicle (EV) sales and range anxiety through parking layout, policy and regulation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 83: p. 63--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Kempton, W. 2016. Electric vehicles: Driving range. Nature Energy. 1(9).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kester, J., et al. 2018. Policy mechanisms to accelerate electric vehicle adoption: A qualitative review from the Nordic region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 94: p. 719--731.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Berkeley, N., et al. 2017. Assessing the transition towards Battery Electric Vehicles: A Multi-Level Perspective on drivers of, and barriers to, take up. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 106: p. 320--332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Tran, M., et al. 2012. Realizing the electric-vehicle revolution. Nature Climate Change. 2(5): p. 328--333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Sierzchula, W., et al. 2014. The influence of financial incentives and other socioeconomic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy. 68: p. 183--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Lin, Z. and D.L. Greene. 2011. Promoting the Market for Plug-In Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles: Role of Recharge Availability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2252(1): p. 49--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Lundin, B.V. 2013. EV infrastructure business booming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lieven, T., et al. 2011 Who will buy electric cars? An empirical study in Germany. Transportation Research Part D. 16(3): p. 236--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Lévay, P.Z., Y. Drossinos, and C. Thiel. 2017. The effect of fiscal incentives on market penetration of electric vehicles: A pairwise comparison of total cost of ownership. Energy Policy. 105: p. 524--533.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Zarazua de Rubens, G. 2019. Who will buy electric vehicles after early adopters? Using machine learning to identify the electric vehicle mainstream market. Energy. 172: p. 243--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. King, C. and B. Datta. 2018. EV charging tariffs that work for EV owners, utilities and society. The Electricity Journal. 31(9): p. 24--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Mukherjee, S.C. and L. Ryan. 2020. Factors influencing early battery electric vehicle adoption in Ireland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jain, P. 2018. The Charging Conundrum: Charging Vs Swapping. What Will Win the Consumer?Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Ko, W. and T.-K. Hahn. 2013. Analysis of Consumer Preferences for Electric Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 4(1): p. 437--442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Fahma, W.S.M.N.B.R.F. 2018. A Review of Electric Vehicles Charging Standard Development: Study Case in Indonesia. 5th International Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology (ICEVT).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. J. Sterman. 2002. System Dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Pruyt, E. 2013. Small system dynamics models for big issues: Triple jump towards real-world complexity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Lannon, C.J.S.T. 2012. Causal loop construction: The basics. 23(8).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Model Conceptualization of Battery Swapping Industry Development Using System Dynamics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      APCORISE '20: Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
      June 2020
      410 pages
      ISBN:9781450376006
      DOI:10.1145/3400934

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 August 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      APCORISE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader