skip to main content
10.1145/3400934.3400968acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Green Warehouse Performance Measurement Model for 3PL Warehousing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 August 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The usage level of outsourcing logistics services in Indonesia from year to year was grow continuously. It makes logistics service outsourcing companies have to compete in terms of improving services to consumers by evaluating the performance level of logistics services offered. By evaluating the performance level of the logistics service outsourcing company (3PL Warehouse), it is expected that the warehouse performance level will achieve the target. In addition, evaluating the level of performance of logistics services is expected to make outsourcing companies get advantages. Therefore, this study integrated two models that were used to measure the Warehouse KPI, namely Supply Chain Operation Reference (SCOR) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) by considering green warehousing criteria. By using these two models, the result was in the form of performance metrics that functioned as a scale to evaluate and measure the performance of the warehouse.

References

  1. M. P. Isaksson and H. Forslund, "Environmentally Sustainable Logistics Performance Management Process Integration between Buyers and," Sustainability, vol. 11, pp. 1--19, doi: 10.3390/su11113061.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Chopra, Supply Chain Management, Sixth Edit. United States of America: Pearson, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Parji, "Model Peningkatan Kinerja Warehouse 5, Services And Warehousing (S&W)-Procurement Pt. Pertamina (Persero) Refinery Unit V Balikpapan," Wareh. Perform., 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Chandra, "Pengukuran Kinerja Gudang Dengan Menggunakan Metode Balanced Scorecard - Studi Kasus Pada PT. GMS - Jakarta," J. Metris, vol. 15, pp. 105--110, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. H. Frazelle, World-Class Warehousing and Material Handling, Second Edi. New York: Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names:, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Kusrini, F. Novendri, and V. N. Helia, "Determining key performance indicators for warehouse performance measurement - A case study in construction materials warehouse," MATEC Web Conf., vol. 154, pp. 6--9, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201815401058.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Republik Indonesia, "Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 3 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perindustrian," 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/fullText/2014/3TAHUN2014UU.HTM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Green Building Council Indonesia, "Greenship Homes Version 1.0," pp. 1--22, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Rahayu, A. Y. Ridwan, and M. Saputra, "Designing Green Warehouse Systems Based on Enterprise Resource Planning for The Leather Tanning Industry," pp. 1--6, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. N. Rachmaniar, Y. Sumantri, and R. Yuniarti, "Evaluation Of Consumer Goods Warehouse's Performance With Supply Chain Operation Reference and Scoring System," REKAYASA DAN Manaj. Sist. Ind., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1--9, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. E. Lepori, D. Damand, and B. Barth, "Benefits and limitations of the SCOR model in warehousing," IFAC Proc. Vol., vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 424--429, doi: 10.3182/20130619-3-RU-3018.00174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. S. C. Council, Supply Chain Operations Reference Model, 11th ed., vol. 10, no. 2. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Paul, Supply Chain Transformation with the SCOR Model of 15 Years of Practical Cross-Industrial Applications. Central Jakarta: PPM, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. "Analisis Produktivitas Menggunakan Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX): Studi Kasus Pada Bagian Produksi Sari Roti PT NIPPON INDOSARI CORPINDO, TBK Pasuruan," J. Teknol. Pertan. Anal. Produkt., vol. 14 no. 3, pp. 215--222, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. B. Yosan, Modul Elearning 13 Metode Omax. Jakarta: Universitas Mercubuana, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. H. M. K. Ahmad Mubin, "Analysis Of Fish Processing Productivity Using Objective Matrix (OMAX) and Traffic Light System (TLS) Methods," Malang, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. N. K. Siregar, "Identification of Opportunities for Failure and Reliability by the FMEA, RCA and RBD Methods and Analysis of the Effectiveness of OEE on Steam Turbines of PT. Perkebunan Nusantara IV Adolina," North Sumatra, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. D. Darnotoputri, D. Arleni, and Pujotomo, "Analisis Produktivitas Pada Produksi Normal Noodle Menggunakan Metode Root Cause Analysis (RCA)," 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. G. Kou, Y. Peng, D. Ergu, and Y. Shi, "Data Processing for the AHP/ANP," Quant. Manag., 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Green Warehouse Performance Measurement Model for 3PL Warehousing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      APCORISE '20: Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
      June 2020
      410 pages
      ISBN:9781450376006
      DOI:10.1145/3400934

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 August 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      APCORISE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader