Cinthya Nila Kristy
ABSTRACT
Construction is typically more dynamic than any other business sector because of construction have a high uncertainty which can be affected by weathers, political-economy conditions, and unpredictable situation along the process. Supplier selection is an important key in construction, delay in supply materials and tools can affect the project's duration. There are many studies for supplier selection to solve the problem of supplier selection in construction. Recent studies using Decision-Making Method with a deterministic mathematical model. The aim of this study is to build a model for supplier selection with a probabilistic mathematical model to solve the uncertain problem in construction. This paper proposes an integrated MCDM methodology. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to determine the weight of the criteria for supplier selection, which needs an opinion from the experts. And Monte Carlo Method is used as a simulation for selected uncertain-criteria in construction using a case study from a construction company. The contribution of this research is to propose a probabilistic model MCDM for supplier selection in construction to conquer the uncertainty.
- Gilang Axelline Andriani, Amelia Sarah, and Kurnia Rahmasari. 2018. Konstruksi Dalam Angka-Construction in Figures 2018. BPS-Statistic Indonesia, Jakarta.Google Scholar
- Patrick Dallasega, Rafael A. Rojas, Giulia Bruno, and E. Rauch. 2019. An agile scheduling and control approach in ETO construction supply chains. Computers in Industry 112: 103122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.08.003.Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Randolph Thomas and Victor E. Sanvido. 2000. ROLE OF THE FABRICATOR IN LABOR PRODUCTIVITY. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2, October: 358--365.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wen Yi and Albert P.C. Chan. 2014. Critical review of labor productivity research in construction journals. Journal of Management in Engineering 30, 2: 214--225. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000194Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carlos H. Caldas, Jung Yeol Kim, Carl T. Haas, Paul M. Goodrum, and Di Zhang. 2015. Method to assess the level of implementation of productivity practices on industrial projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 141, 1. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000919Google ScholarCross Ref
- Manoj Kumar Dash Anil Kumar, Amit Pal, Ashwani Vohra, Sachin Gupta, Suryakant Manchanda. 2017. Article information: Construction of Capital Procurement Decision Making Models to Optimize Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy Delphi and AHP-DEMATEL. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2017-0005Google Scholar
- Abhishek Kumar, Bikash Sah, Arvind R. Singh, Yan Deng, Xiangning He, Praveen Kumar, and R. C. Bansal. 2017. A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 69, October 2016: 596--609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. P. Kaliyamurthi. 2017. A Comparison of strength and weakness for analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 116, 8: 29--33.Google Scholar
- R. D. Raut, H. V. Bhasin, S. S. Kamble, and S. Banerjee, "An integrated fuzzy-AHP-LP (FAHLP) approach for supplier selection and purchasing decisions," Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 400--425, 2011.Google Scholar
- Jana Fabianova, Peter Kacmary, and Jaroslava Janekova. 2020. Operative production planning utilising quantitative forecasting and Monte Carlo simulations. Open Engineering 9, 1: 613--622. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2019-0071Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fikri Dweiri, Sameer Kumar, Sharfuddin Ahmed, and Vipul Jain. 2016. Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. 62: 273--283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.030Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khurrum S Bhutta. 2006. Research paper Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540210436586Google Scholar
- Hesham A. Hefny, Hamed M. Elsayed, and Hisham F. Aly. 2013. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for different scenarios of electrical power generation in Egypt. Egyptian Informatics Journal 14, 2: 125--133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2013.04.001Google ScholarCross Ref
- Siti Komsiyah, Rini Wongso, and Syali Widia Pratiwi. 2019. Applications of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for decision support systems of cement vendor selection. In Procedia Computer Science, 479--488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.003Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gholam Ali Montazer, Hamed Qahri Saremi, and Maryam Ramezani. 2009. Design a new mixed expert decision aiding system using fuzzy ELECTRE III method for vendor selection. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 8: 10837--10847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.019Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sanjay Kumar, Saurabh Kumar, and Asim Gopal Barman. 2018. Supplier selection using fuzzy TOPSIS multi criteria model for a small scale steel manufacturing unit. Procedia Computer Science 133: 905--912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.097Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ying-ming Wang and Kwai-sang Chin. 2011. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology q. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 52, 4: 541 -553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2010.12.004.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fariborz Jolai, Seyed Ahmad, Kamran Shahanaghi, and Mohammad Azari. 2011. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management Integrating fuzzy TOPSIS and multi-period goal programming for purchasing multiple products from multiple suppliers. 17: 42--53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2010.06.004Google Scholar
- Devika Kannan, Roohollah Khodaverdi, Laya Olfat, Ahmad Jafarian, and Ali Diabat. 2013. Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi- objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. 47.Google Scholar
- Chin Nung Liao and Hsing Pei Kao. 2011. An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP approach to supplier selection in supply chain management. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 9: 10803--10811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.031Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan A. Schachter and Pierluigi Mancarella. 2016. Demand Response Contracts as Real Options: A Probabilistic Evaluation Framework under Short-Term and Long-Term Uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 7, 2: 868--878. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2015.2405673Google Scholar
- Yumiko Iwafune, Kazuhiko Ogimoto, Yuki Kobayashi, and Kensuke Murai. 2020. Driving Simulator for Electric Vehicles Using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method and Evaluation of the Demand Response Effect in Residential Houses. IEEE Access 8: 47654--47663. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978867Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. W. Geda and C. K. Kwong. 2019. Forecasting of Used Product Returns for Remanufacturing. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2019-December: 889--893. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607362Google Scholar
- Nicole Ludwig, Lukas Barth, Dorothea Wagner, and Veit Hagenmeyer. 2019. Industrial demand-side flexibility: A benchmark data set. e-Energy 2019 - Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems: 460--473. https://doi.org/10.1145/3307772.3331021Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Saaty. Tutorial on Complex Decision Models (ANP).Google Scholar
- Bushra Luzon and Sameh M El-sayegh. 2016. Evaluating supplier selection criteria for oil and gas projects in the UAE using AHP and Delphi. 3599, March. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1146112Google Scholar
- Tl Saaty and Lg Vargas. 2012. Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6Google Scholar
- Chia Nan Wang, Ying Fang Huang, I. Fang Cheng, and Van Thanh Nguyen. 2018. A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Approach Using Hybrid SCOR Metrics, AHP, and TOPSIS for supplier evaluation and selection in the gas and oil industry. Processes 6, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6120252Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reuven Y. Rubinstein and Dirk P. Kroese. 2008. SIMULATION AND THE MONTE CARLO METHOD. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Richard B. Chase, F.Robert Jacobs, and Nicholas J. Aqiulano. 2006. Operations Management for Competitive Advantage. xix+ 806.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- An Integrated Analytical Hierarchy Process and Monte Carlo Method Approach for Supplier Selection in Construction's Supply Chain
Recommendations
Supplier selection on agrifood supply chain: a Delphi-AHP-TOPSIS methodology
Supplier selection is important strategic decision for agrifood supply chain management. This decision problem is frequently complex and unstructured. This paper aim presents a Delphi-AHP-TOPSIS framework for supplier selection problem. The making-...
Sustainable supplier selection for smart supply chain considering internal and external uncertainty: An integrated rough-fuzzy approach
AbstractThis study proposes a novel framework to identify smart-sustainable SCMP (supply chain management practices) as supplier selection criteria for a smart supply chain. Supplier selection consists of two parts: criteria weights ...
Highlights- New topic on sustainable supplier selection for smart supply chain is put forward.
An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP approach to supplier selection in supply chain management
Supplier selection is an important issue in supply chain management. In recent years, determining the best supplier in the supply chain has become a key strategic consideration. However, these decisions usually involve several objectives or criteria, ...
Comments