skip to main content
10.1145/3401895.3401898acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageseatis-orgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Benchmarking performance of different noise detection techniques on data stream clustering

Published: 29 January 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Numerous internet-based applications produce data streams. A data stream is a succession of available data that may shift over time. Data from the Internet of Things (IoT), social media, traffic lights, financial institutions, phone records, sensor data, banking and healthcare systems are examples of data streams. Obtaining knowledge from data streams presents defiances. The noise reduction process is one of them. Detecting and reducing noise is essential to improve the performance of any machine intelligence technique. In this paper, we create a performance evaluation of four different noise detection algorithms on data stream clustering that are implemented in MOA: Micro-cluster-based Continuous Outlier Detection (MCOD), AbstractC, SimpleCOD and AnyOut. We use each of these techniques to assess the quality of clustering produced by the clustering algorithm known as ClusCTA-MEWMA (Clustering based on Centroid Tracking and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Chart Detection Method). We reference this algorithm as CM. We set up and monitor experiments using datasets created using a random data generator. The results evidence that CM gets better model quality with with Micro-cluster-based Continuous Outlier Detection algorithm.

References

[1]
J. Gama, Knowledge Discovery from Data Streams, 1st ed., Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2010.
[2]
Jaramillo, Londoño and Cardona, Rastreo de centroides en streams de datos, [Online]. Available: http://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n59/17385927.html, 2108. [Accessed 11 marzo 2019]
[3]
S. Jaramillo, J. Londoño and S. A. Cardona, [Online]. Available: Una técnica de clustering con rastreo de centroides y MEWMA. http://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n59/17385927.html, 2108. [Accessed 11 marzo 2019].
[4]
Toliopoulos and Gounaris. Multi-parameter streaming outlier detection. WI '19, 2019.
[5]
Oh and Iyengar. Sequential Anomaly Detection using Inverse Reinforcement Learning. KDD '19, 2019.
[6]
Cheng, Zou and Dong. F Outlier detection using isolation forest and local outlier factor. RACS '19, 2019.
[7]
Palyvos-Giannas, Gulisano and Papatriantafilou. Haren: A Middleware for Ad-Hoc Thread Scheduling Policies in Data Streaming. Middleware '19, 2019
[8]
Friggstad, Khodamoradi, Rezapour and SalavatipourApproximation Schemes for Clustering with Outliers. TALG, 2019
[9]
G. Sunitha, C. Jaswitha. Data Stream Clustering Algorithms. IJITEE, Vol 8 (11), 2019tra
[10]
Ma, Wang, Zhao and Dian. Weighted LS-SVMR-Based System Identification with Outliers. CACRE2019, 2019.
[11]
Carnein M and Trautmann H (2019), "Optimizing Data Stream Representation: An Extensive Survey on Stream Clustering Algorithms", Business & Information Systems Engineering (BISE)., 1, 2019. Vol. 61, pp. 277--297.
[12]
Ndirangu, Mwangi and Nderu. An Ensemble Filter Feature Selection Method and Outlier Detection Method for Multiclass Classification. CSCA '19 Proceedings, 2019.
[13]
Tran, Fan and Shahabi. Outlier Detection in Non-stationary Data Streams. SDBM '19 Proceedings, 2019.
[14]
D. Yang, E. A. Rundensteiner and M. O. Ward, Neighbor-based Pattern Detection for Windows over Streaming Data, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology, New York, NY, USA, 2009.
[15]
AMiner Efficient Distributed Outlier Detectionin Data Streams Available: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02100486/document. [Accessed 04 december 2019].
[16]
Cano, Krawczyk and Roseberry. Multi-Label Punitive kNN with Self-Adjusting Memory for Drifting Data Streams. CM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD). Volume 13 Issue 6, November 2019
[17]
Benjello, Oussousa, Bennanib, Belfkiha, Ait and Lahcen, Improving outliers detection in data streams using LiCS and voting. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 2019.
[18]
Yang, Zhou, Shu and Zhang. A Fast and Efficient Local Outlier Detection in Data Streams. IVSP, 2019
[19]
Manzoor, Lamba and Akoglu. xStream: Outlier Detection in Feature-Evolving Data Streams. KDD '18, 2018.
[20]
L. Cao, Outlier Detection in Big Data, in Doctoral dissertation, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2016.
[21]
Friggstad, Khodamoradi, Rezapour and Salavatipour. Approximation Schemes for Clustering with Outliers. TALG, 2019.
[22]
Yoon, Lee and Lee. NETS: extremely fast outlier detection from a data stream via set-based processing. VLDB Endowment, 2019.
[23]
Waikato, Stream Clustering, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://moa.cms.waikato.ac.nz/details/stream-clustering/. [Accessed 04 december 2019].
[24]
S. Jaramillo, Centroid tracking for data streams with concept drift, Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga, vol. Vol.38(38) 2017.
[25]
R. Kirkby, RandomRBFGeneratorEvents, Available: https://rdrr.io/cran/streamMOA/man/DSD_RandomRBFGeneratorEvents.html. [Accessed 04 december 2019].
[26]
Ceccarello, Pietracaprina and Pucci. Solving k-center clustering (with outliers) in MapReduce and streaming, almost as accurately as sequentially. VLDB Endowment. 12 (7), 2019
[27]
Pang, Shen and Hengel. Deep Anomaly Detection with Deviation Networks. KDD '19, 2019.

Index Terms

  1. Benchmarking performance of different noise detection techniques on data stream clustering

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EATIS '20: Proceedings of the 10th Euro-American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems
    November 2020
    388 pages
    ISBN:9781450377119
    DOI:10.1145/3401895
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 January 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. big data
    2. data stream clustering
    3. noise
    4. outliers

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    EATIS 2020

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 17 of 64 submissions, 27%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 50
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media