skip to main content
10.1145/3401956.3404225acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmocoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing Glitch Procedures and Visualisation Workflows for Markerless Live Motion Capture of Contemporary Dance

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a case study in the exploration and creative usage of errors and glitches in the real-time markerless motion capture of contemporary dance. We developed a typology of MoCap failures comprised of seven categories, allowing the user to situate each distinct error in the respective stage of the motion capture pipeline. This way, glitch procedures for the creative use of 'bad' MoCap data were designed, resulting in uncommon avatar visualisations. We propose an additional 're-visualisation' module in our motion capture pipeline and avatar staging approach, which enables choreographers and digital artists to rapidly prototype their ideas in a mixed reality performance environment. Finally, we discuss how our extended MoCap pipeline and avatar staging set-up can support artists and researchers who aim at a flexible and adaptive workflow in real-time motion visualization.

References

  1. Michael Betancourt. 2016. Glitch Art in Theory and Practice: Critical Failures and Post-Digital Aesthetics. Focal Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kim Cascone. 2000. The Aesthetics of Failure: "Post-Digital" Tendencies in Contemporary Computer Music. Computer Music Journal 24, 4 (Dec. 2000), 12--18. https://doi.org/10.1162/014892600559489Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Paul Dourish. 2004. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Georges Gagneré and Cédric Plessiet. 2018. Experiencing avatar direction in low cost theatrical mixed reality setup. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Movement and Computing (MOCO '18). ACM, Genoa, Italy, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3212721.3212892Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Joe Geigel and Marla Schweppe. 2011. Motion capture for realtime control of virtual actors in live, distributed, theatrical performances. In Face and Gesture 2011. 774--779. https://doi.org/10.1109/FG.2011.5771347 ISSN: null.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Raul Masu, Nuno N. Correia, Stephan Jurgens, Ivana Druzetic, and William Primett. 2019. How do Dancers Want to Use Interactive Technology? Appropriation and Layers of Meaning Beyond Traditional Movement Mapping. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (ARTECH 2019). ACM, Braga, Portugal, 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359852.3359869Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rosa Menkman. 2011. Glitch Studies Manifesto. In Video Vortex Reader II. Institute of Network Cultures. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0732/56f0c90a712365890f379f7dc55bd1377f3e.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Bill Miller. 2015. Experimenting with Noise in Markerless Motion Capture. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Workshop on Movement and Computing (MOCO '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 128--131. https://doi.org/10.1145/2790994.2791019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mark Nunes. 2010. Error: Glitch, Noise, and Jam in New Media Cultures. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chris Salter. 2010. Entangled: Technology and the Transformation of Performance. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Georgios Tsampounaris, Katerina El Raheb, Vivi Katifori, and Yannis Ioannidis. 2016. Exploring Visualizations in Real-time Motion Capture for Dance Education. In Proceedings of the 20th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics (PCI '16). ACM, Patras, Greece, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003733.3003811Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Designing Glitch Procedures and Visualisation Workflows for Markerless Live Motion Capture of Contemporary Dance

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          MOCO '20: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Movement and Computing
          July 2020
          205 pages
          ISBN:9781450375054
          DOI:10.1145/3401956

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 July 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate50of110submissions,45%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader