ABSTRACT
Understanding brain connectivity patterns that may spontaneously emerge in response to biofeedback training remains of great interest to neuroscientists. Along those lines, Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) mediated by EEG signals that dynamically evolve as the user attempts to control a cursor on the screen, has helped identify brain areas recruited during the learning process. There is an adaptive process that takes place between the computer algorithm and the solution that the brain arrives at to mentally control the instructed cursor direction through intentional thoughts. Using new personalized techniques, we here address how different participants learn during this co-adaptive process, in which bodily motions are curtailed in favor of mental motion. First, the person uses mental imagery of directional movements to attempt the cursor control, but as the computer algorithm and the brain work together to gain accuracy, this mental imagery reportedly reaches a different level of abstraction to the point when the participants are mentally controlling the external computer cursor, yet no longer imagining the movement direction. We compared the evolution of a participant without proprioception owing to neuronopathy, to that of participants with intact afferent nerves and found fundamentally different patterns of activation. In the former, the connectivity patterns were far higher and distributed across the entire brain during the initial stages of learning, along with the changes across the learning stages being more pronounced in contrast to the other participants. We infer from this result that in the absence of kinesthetic reafference, heavy reliance on other senses like vision and hearing, may endow the brain with higher capacity to handle the excess cognitive load.
- M. Kawato and D.M. Wolpert. 1998. Internal models for motor control. Novartis Foundation Symposia. 218: p. 291--304; discussion 304--7.Google Scholar
- D.M. Wolpert and M. Kawato. 1998. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks. 11(7--8): p. 1317--29.Google Scholar
- D. M Wolpert, R.C. Miall, and M. Kawato. 1998. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends in Cognitive Science. 2(9): p. 338--47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Von Holst and H. Mittelstaedt. 1950. The principle of reafference: Interactions between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. In: Perceptual Processing: Stimulus equivalence and pattern recognition (Dodwell PC, ed). pp 41--72. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- E.B. Torres. 2018. Objective Biometric Methods for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Nervous System Disorders. Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- J. Cole. 1995. Pride and a daily marathon. 1st MIT Press ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. p. 194.Google Scholar
- J. Cole. 1998. Rehabilitation after sensory neuronopathy syndrome. Journal of The Royal Society of Medicine 91:30--32.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Cole and J. Paillard. 1995. Living without touch and peripheral information about body position and movement: studies with deafferented subjects. In: The body and self (Bermudez JL, Marcel AJ, eds), p. 245--266. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- J. Cole and E. M. Sedgwick. 1992. The perceptions of force and of movement in a man without large myelinated sensory afferents below the neck. Journal of Physiology. 449:p. 503--515.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Cole, W. L. Merton, G. Barrett, H. A. Katifi, and R. D. Treede.1995. Evoked potentials in subject with a large-fibre sensory neuronopathy below the neck. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 73:p. 234--245.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Balakrishnan and D. Madigan. 2008. Algorithms for sparse linear classifiers in the massive data setting. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9:313--337.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Ding and R. F. Harrison. 2011. A sparse multinomial probit model for classification. Pattern Analysis and Applications 146:p. 47--55.Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Choi and E.B. Torres. 2013. Intentional signal in prefrontal cortex generalizes across different sensory modalities. Journal of Neurophysiology. 112 (1): p. 61--80.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Makeig, S. Debener, J. Onton, and A. Delorme. 2004. Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Science 8:204--210Google ScholarCross Ref
- A.J. Bell and T. Sejnowski. 1997. The "independent components" of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research. Volume 37, Issue 23, December 1997, Pages 3327--3338.Google Scholar
- J. Ryu and E.B. Torres. 2018. Characterization of Sensory-Motor Behavior Under Cognitive Load Using a New Statistical Platform for Studies of Embodied Cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.12: p. 116.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Lleonart, J. Salat, and G.J Torres. 2000. Removing allometric effects of body size in morphological analysis. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 205, 85--93.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O. Sporns. Networks of the Brain. 2010. MIT PressGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- J. Ryu, J. Vero, and E.B.Torres. 2017. Methods for Tracking Dynamically Coupled Brain-Body Activities during Natural Movement. In Proceedings of MOCO'17. London, UnitedKingdom, June 28--30.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Aydorea, D. Pantazis, and R.M Leahy. 2013. A note on the phase locking value and its properties. NeuroImage. 74: p. 231--244Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Xia, J. Wang, and Y. He. 2013. BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics. PLoS ONE 8(7).Google Scholar
- G. Monge. 1781. Memoire sur la theorie des deblais et des remblais. In Histoire de l'Academie Royale des Science; avec les Memoired de Mathematique et de Physique. De L'imprimerie Royale: Paris, France. 1781.Google Scholar
- Y. Rubner, C. Tomasi, L. J. Guibas. 1998. Metric for Distributions with Applications to Image Databases. In Proceedings of the ICCV. Bombay, India, 4--7 January 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Neural Connectivity Evolution during Adaptive Learning with and without Proprioception
Recommendations
Discriminating and understanding brain states in children with epileptic spasms using deep learning and graph metrics analysis of brain connectivity
Abstract Background and objectiveEpilepsy is a brain disorder consisting of abnormal electrical discharges of neurons resulting in epileptic seizures. The nature and spatial distribution of these electrical signals make epilepsy a ...
Brain stimulation and brain computer interfacing
HCI '18: Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction ConferenceIn this workshop paper, we present two of our team's findings on the effect of brain electrical stimulation on BCI performance, reflecting a trend in neuro-engineering research. In many applications, BCI technology targets users with impaired neural ...
Detecting error-related negativity for interaction design
CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis paper examines the ability to detect a characteristic brain potential called the Error-Related Negativity (ERN) using off-the-shelf headsets and explores its applicability to HCI. ERN is triggered when a user either makes a mistake or the ...
Comments