ABSTRACT
The "Light the Way" project focuses on how intention can be transmitted through a media agent in a dance performance. We are interested in both how the agent may transmit its intention, how it may perceive the intention of humans, as well as how the human perceived and then expresses their intention to fulfill their gesture; particularly in relation to space. We describe a trajectory of interactive performance works that explore embodied cues as intention in space through four steps: 1) a fully autonomous and interactive sonic agent with its own behaviours, 2) a human-operated, non-autonomous or interactive visual agent in a controlled workshop, 3) a dancer-operated, non-autonomous or interactive visual agent in a live performance, and 4) an autonomous, non-interactive visual agent with its own behaviours in a controlled workshop. This work explores the balance between different forms of embodied connections that are developed between human and agent performers, and the ways that this work could be developed in the future to support more intuitive interactions.
- [n. d.]. Marie Sester: ACCESS, 2003. ([n. d.]). http://www.sester.net/access/Google Scholar
- [n. d.]. Verity Studios - Raffaello.name. ([n. d.]). https://raffaello.name/projects/verity-studios/ Library Catalog: raffaello.name.Google Scholar
- Michael Argyle. 2017. Social interaction: process and products. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Anne Bogart and Tina Landau. 2004. The Viewpoints Book: A Practical Guide to Viewpoints and Composition. Theatre Communications Group.Google Scholar
- Kristin Carlson, Prophecy Sun, Shannon Cuykendall, Maria Lantin, Thecla Schiphorst, and Greg Corness. 2017. Beyond the Here and Now: Exploring Threaded Presence in Mediated, Improvised Performance. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 26, 2 (2017), 97--110. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00288Google ScholarDigital Library
- Greg Corness and Thecla Schiphorst. 2013. Performing with a System's Intention: Embodied Cues in Performer-system Interaction. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition (C&C '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 156--164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2466627.2466642Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah Fdili Alaoui, Jules Françoise, Thecla Schiphorst, Karen Studd, and Frederic Bevilacqua. 2017. Seeing, Sensing and Recognizing Laban Movement Qualities. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4009--4020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025530Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher Frayling. 1994. Research in art and design (Royal College of Art Research Papers, vol 1, no 1, 1993/4). (1994).Google Scholar
- Swar Gujrania, Duri Long, and Brian Magerko. 2019. Moving in Virtual Space: A Laban-inspired Framework for Procedural Animation. In Proceedings of the Experimental AI in Games Workshop (EXAG) at the 15th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE '19) (2019).Google Scholar
- Guy Hoffman, Rony Kubat, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2008. A hybrid control system for puppeteering a live robotic stage actor. In RO-MAN 2008-The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 354--359.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Doris Humphrey. 1959. The Art of Making Dances. Princeton Book Company.Google Scholar
- Mikhail Jacob, Alexander Zook, and Brian Magerko. 2013. Viewpoints AI: Procedurally Representing and Reasoning about Gestures. DiGRA conference (2013).Google Scholar
- Philippe Pasquier, Eunjung Han, Kirak Kim, and Keechul Jung. 2008. The Video Shadow: an Embodied Agent. In ACM International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technologies (ACE 2008). Yokohama, 71--75.Google Scholar
- Steve Paxton. 1975. Contact improvisation. The Drama Review: TDR (1975), 40--42.Google Scholar
- Sita Popat and Scott Palmer. 2005. Creating common ground: dialogues between performance and digital technologies. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 1, 1 (April 2005), 47--65. https://doi.org/10.1386/padm.1.1.47/1Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karen Studd and Laura L Cox. 2013. Everybody is a body. Dog Ear Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
- Mick Wallis, Sita Popat, Joslin McKinney, John Bryden, and David C. Hogg. 2010. Embodied conversations: performance and the design of a robotic dancing partner. Design Studies 31, 2 (March 2010), 99--117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.09.001Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Perceiving the Light: Exploring Embodied Cues in Interactive Agents for Dance
Recommendations
A Participatory Live Music Performance with the Open Symphony System
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsOur Open Symphony system reimagines the music experience for a digital age, fostering alliances between performer and audience and our digital selves. Open Symphony enables live participatory music performance where the audience actively engages in the ...
Studying and designing emotions in live interactions with the audience
AbstractIn the last decade, a number of projects have investigated the use of digital technologies to increase the engagement of the audience in live interactive performance. In this paper, we explore the relation between interactive performance and ...
Acting with Technology: Rehearsing for Mixed-Media Live Performances
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDigital technologies provide theater with new possibilities for combining traditional stage-based performances with interactive artifacts, for streaming remote parallel performances and for other device facilitated audience interaction. Compared to ...
Comments