skip to main content
10.1145/3401956.3404241acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmocoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Perceiving the Light: Exploring Embodied Cues in Interactive Agents for Dance

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The "Light the Way" project focuses on how intention can be transmitted through a media agent in a dance performance. We are interested in both how the agent may transmit its intention, how it may perceive the intention of humans, as well as how the human perceived and then expresses their intention to fulfill their gesture; particularly in relation to space. We describe a trajectory of interactive performance works that explore embodied cues as intention in space through four steps: 1) a fully autonomous and interactive sonic agent with its own behaviours, 2) a human-operated, non-autonomous or interactive visual agent in a controlled workshop, 3) a dancer-operated, non-autonomous or interactive visual agent in a live performance, and 4) an autonomous, non-interactive visual agent with its own behaviours in a controlled workshop. This work explores the balance between different forms of embodied connections that are developed between human and agent performers, and the ways that this work could be developed in the future to support more intuitive interactions.

References

  1. [n. d.]. Marie Sester: ACCESS, 2003. ([n. d.]). http://www.sester.net/access/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [n. d.]. Verity Studios - Raffaello.name. ([n. d.]). https://raffaello.name/projects/verity-studios/ Library Catalog: raffaello.name.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Michael Argyle. 2017. Social interaction: process and products. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Anne Bogart and Tina Landau. 2004. The Viewpoints Book: A Practical Guide to Viewpoints and Composition. Theatre Communications Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kristin Carlson, Prophecy Sun, Shannon Cuykendall, Maria Lantin, Thecla Schiphorst, and Greg Corness. 2017. Beyond the Here and Now: Exploring Threaded Presence in Mediated, Improvised Performance. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 26, 2 (2017), 97--110. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00288Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Greg Corness and Thecla Schiphorst. 2013. Performing with a System's Intention: Embodied Cues in Performer-system Interaction. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition (C&C '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 156--164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2466627.2466642Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sarah Fdili Alaoui, Jules Françoise, Thecla Schiphorst, Karen Studd, and Frederic Bevilacqua. 2017. Seeing, Sensing and Recognizing Laban Movement Qualities. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4009--4020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025530Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Christopher Frayling. 1994. Research in art and design (Royal College of Art Research Papers, vol 1, no 1, 1993/4). (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Swar Gujrania, Duri Long, and Brian Magerko. 2019. Moving in Virtual Space: A Laban-inspired Framework for Procedural Animation. In Proceedings of the Experimental AI in Games Workshop (EXAG) at the 15th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE '19) (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Guy Hoffman, Rony Kubat, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2008. A hybrid control system for puppeteering a live robotic stage actor. In RO-MAN 2008-The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 354--359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Doris Humphrey. 1959. The Art of Making Dances. Princeton Book Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mikhail Jacob, Alexander Zook, and Brian Magerko. 2013. Viewpoints AI: Procedurally Representing and Reasoning about Gestures. DiGRA conference (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Philippe Pasquier, Eunjung Han, Kirak Kim, and Keechul Jung. 2008. The Video Shadow: an Embodied Agent. In ACM International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technologies (ACE 2008). Yokohama, 71--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Steve Paxton. 1975. Contact improvisation. The Drama Review: TDR (1975), 40--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sita Popat and Scott Palmer. 2005. Creating common ground: dialogues between performance and digital technologies. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 1, 1 (April 2005), 47--65. https://doi.org/10.1386/padm.1.1.47/1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Karen Studd and Laura L Cox. 2013. Everybody is a body. Dog Ear Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mick Wallis, Sita Popat, Joslin McKinney, John Bryden, and David C. Hogg. 2010. Embodied conversations: performance and the design of a robotic dancing partner. Design Studies 31, 2 (March 2010), 99--117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.09.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Perceiving the Light: Exploring Embodied Cues in Interactive Agents for Dance

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MOCO '20: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Movement and Computing
      July 2020
      205 pages
      ISBN:9781450375054
      DOI:10.1145/3401956

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 July 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate50of110submissions,45%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader