skip to main content
10.1145/3403676.3403678acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschinese-chiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Marketplace for Choice and Independence: Young Chinese’s Social Commerce Practices on WeChat

Published: 23 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In recent years, journalists report that many young Chinese students studying abroad use online technologies to resell overseas products to customers in China. One of the technologies these young people use is WeChat, the most popular mobile social platform in China. We sought to gain a formative understanding of young Chinese’s social commerce practices of buying and selling on WeChat. We interviewed 15 young people in Beijing and Shenzhen about their buying and selling practices on WeChat and their motivations to participate in these practices. Participants considered WeChat convenient, ubiquitous, good for leveraging social relationships, and easy to start new businesses. WeChat supports young people in earning money and exploring their future, which in turn helps them gain autonomy from their parents. We discuss learnings from this study to shed light on youth’s technology use, social commerce, and technology design under the context of China.

References

[1]
Paul J C Adachi and Teena Willoughby. 2013. Do Video Games Promote Positive Youth Development?Journal of Adolescent Research 28, 2 (2013), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558412464522
[2]
Monica Anderson and Jingjing Jiang. 2018. Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018. http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
[3]
Craig B Barkacs. 1997. Multilevel marketing and antifraud statutes: Legal enterprises or pyramid schemes?Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25, 2 (1997), 176. https://search.proquest.com/docview/224862795?pq-origsite=gscholar
[4]
BBC News. 2015. Explainer: What was China’s one-child policy?http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-34667551
[5]
Wiebe E. Bijker. 1997. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. The MIT Press.
[6]
Brad J Bushman and L Rowell Huesmann. 2014. Twenty-Five Years of Research on Violence in Digital Games and Aggression Revisited. European Psychologist 19, 1 (2014), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000164
[7]
Philip A Chan and Terry Rabinowitz. 2006. A cross-sectional analysis of video games and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in adolescents. Annals of General Psychiatry 5, 1 (oct 2006), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-5-16
[8]
Kathy Charmaz. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.11.003 arxiv:arXiv:1011.1669v3
[9]
Jinyun Chen. 2017. Can online social networks foster young adults’ civic engagement?Telematics and Informatics 34, 5 (2017), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.09.013
[10]
Yujie Chen, Zhifei Mao, and Jack Linchuan Qiu. 2018. Super-sticky WeChat and Chinese society. Emerald Publishing Limited.
[11]
Renata Gonçalves Curty and Ping Zhang. 2011. Social commerce: Looking back and forward. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801096
[12]
danah michele Boyd. 2008. Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley. https://search.proquest.com/docview/304697239?pq-origsite=gscholar
[13]
Betsy DiSalvo and Amy Bruckman. 2011. From Interests to Values. Commun. ACM 54, 8 (2011), 27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978542.1978552
[14]
Harry T Dyer. 2017. The Presentation of Selfie in Everyday Life: Considering the Relationship Between Social Media Design and User in the Online Actions and Interactions of Young People. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society(#SMSociety17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6:1—-6:11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097292
[15]
Hayley I Evans, Marisol Wong-Villacres, Daniel Castro, Eric Gilbert, Rosa I Arriaga, Michaelanne Dye, and Amy Bruckman. 2018. Facebook in Venezuela: Understanding Solidarity Economies in Low-Trust Environments. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 228:1—-228:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173802
[16]
Vanessa L. Fong. 2004. Heavy is the Head of the ”Little Emperor”: Pressure, Discipline, and Competition in the Stratification System. In Only Hope: Coming of Age Under China’s One-Child Policy. Stanford University Press, 87–126.
[17]
Ross Garnaut, Ligang Song, and Cai Fang (Eds.). 2018. China’s 40 Years of Reform and Development: 1978–2018. ANU Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv5cgbnk
[18]
James Paul Gee. 2007. Good video games + good learning: collected essays on video games, learning, and literacy. P. Lang. 194 pages. https://books.google.com/books/about/Good_Video_Games_+_Good_Learning.html?id=6NY2i9stxZwC
[19]
Omer Abdelhamid Ibrahim Gibreel, Dhari A AlOtaibi, Seongmin Jeon, and Byungjoon Yoo. 2015. Will Insta-Business Be the Electronic Contemporary Bazaar?: An Exploratory Analysis on Electronic Commerce in Kuwait. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Electronic Commerce 2015(ICEC ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10:1—-10:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2781562.2781573
[20]
Thomas Gold, Doug Guthrie, and David Wank (Eds.). 2002. Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture, and the Changing Nature of Guanxi. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=37tl46NFxqQC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=guanxi+in+china&ots=287KvkoocR&sig=tgDmnYTp4xgycVHzpFlqVdm0a48#v=onepage&q=guanxi in china&f=false
[21]
Leo A. Goodman. 1961. Snowball Sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32, 1 (1961), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.2307/2237615
[22]
Elisheva F. Gross. 2004. Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 25, 6 (nov 2004), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPDEV.2004.09.005
[23]
Elisheva F. Gross, Jaana Juvonen, and Shelly L. Gable. 2002. Internet Use and Well-Being in Adolescence. Journal of Social Issues 58, 1 (jan 2002), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00249
[24]
Zhao Huang and Morad Benyoucef. 2013. From e-commerce to social commerce: A close look at design features. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12, 4 (jul 2013), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELERAP.2012.12.003
[25]
Lilly Irani, Janet Vertesi, Paul Dourish, Kavita Philip, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2010. Postcolonial Computing: A Lens on Design and Development. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’10(CHI ’10). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1311–1320. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753522
[26]
Mizuko Ito and Okabe Daisuke. 2005. Mobile Phones, Japanese Youth, and the Re-Placement of Social Contact. In Mobile Communication and the Renegotiation of the Social Sphere, Rich Ling and Per Pedersen (Eds.). Springer.
[27]
Mizuko Itō, Sonja Baumer, Matteo Bittanti, Danah Boyd, Rachel Cody, Becky Herr-Stephenson, Heather A. Horst, Patricia G. Lange, Dilan Mahendran, Katynka Z. Martinez, C. J. Pascoe, Dan Perhel, Laura Robinson, Christo Sims, and Lisa Tripp. 2010. Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. The MIT Press. 419 pages.
[28]
Margaret Jack, Jay Chen, and Steven J Jackson. 2017. Infrastructure As Creative Action: Online Buying, Selling, and Delivery in Phnom Penh. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6511–6522. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025889
[29]
Paul Kariuki and Lizzy Oluwatoyin Ofusori. 2017. WhatsApp-Operated Stokvels Promoting Youth Entrepreneurship in Durban, South Africa: Experiences of Young Entrepreneurs. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance(ICEGOV ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047397
[30]
Marianne Kinnula, Netta Iivari, and Tuula Ijäs. 2012. On the Brink of Adulthood: A Qualitative Study of Adolescent Engagement with the Internet. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design(NordiCHI ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 418–427. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399081
[31]
Yong Ming Kow, Xinning Gui, and Waikuen Cheng. 2017. Special Digital Monies: The Design of Alipay and WeChat Wallet for Mobile Payment Practices in China. In 16th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 10516. 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68059-0
[32]
Dune Lawrence. 2016. Life in the People’s Republic of WeChat. Bloomberg Businessweek (jun 2016). https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-09/life-in-the-people-s-republic-of-wechat
[33]
Nan Lin. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=fvBzIu5-yuMC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=social+capital&ots=UW0vl5uEFS&sig=dYgNPHfnQhv9vORnPr_OvESfwtc#v=onepage&q=social capital&f=false
[34]
Silvia Lindtner, Ken Anderson, and Paul Dourish. 2012. Cultural Appropriation: Information Technologies As Sites of Transnational Imagination. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145220
[35]
Baozhou Lu, Weiguo Fan, and Mi Zhou. 2016. Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior 56 (mar 2016), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2015.11.057
[36]
Niall McCarthy. 2018. China Now Boasts More Than 800 Million Internet Users And 98% Of Them Are Mobile. https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/08/23/china-now-boasts-more-than-800-million-internet-users-and-98-of-them-are-mobile-infographic
[37]
Steven Millward. 2018. 7 years of WeChat. https://www.techinasia.com/history-of-wechat
[38]
Carol Moser, Paul Resnick, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2017. Community Commerce: Facilitating Trust in Mom-to-Mom Sale Groups on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4344–4357. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025550
[39]
Joel Penney. 2018. Young People As Political Influencers on Social Media: Skepticism and Network Thinking. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society(SMSociety ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1145/3217804.3217944
[40]
Jean-Christophe Plantin and Gabriele de Seta. 2019. WeChat as infrastructure: the techno-nationalist shaping of Chinese digital platforms. Chinese Journal of Communication 0, 0 (2019), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1572633
[41]
Inés Ruiz Requies, Eduardo Fernandez Rodriguez, José Miguel Gutiérrez Pequeño, and Rocio Anguita Martinez. 2016. The Construction of Identity of Young People in an Interconnected Society. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality(TEEM ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 603–610. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012430.3012581
[42]
Irving Seidman. 2006. Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/032390
[43]
Statista. 2020. Most popular social networks worldwide as of April 2020, ranked by number of active users. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
[44]
Andrew T. Stephen and Olivier Toubia. 2010. Deriving Value from Social Commerce Networks. Journal of Marketing Research 47, 2 (apr 2010), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.2.215
[45]
Gayatri Swamynathan, Christo Wilson, Bryce Boe, Kevin Almeroth, and Ben Y Zhao. 2008. Do Social Networks Improve e-Commerce?: A Study on Social Marketplaces. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Online Social Networks(WOSN ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/1397735.1397737
[46]
The Economist. 2017. An army of Chinese shoppers dictates the fate of Australian brands: How firms Down Under cam to embrace daigou. The Economist (dec 2017). https://www.economist.com/news/asia/21732127-how-firms-down-under-came-embrace-daigou-army-chinese-shoppers-dictates-fate
[47]
Xiaobo Wang and Baotong Gu. 2016. The communication design of WeChat: ideological as well as technical aspects of social media. Communication Design Quarterly Review 4, 1 (jan 2016), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/2875501.2875503
[48]
WeChat. 2011. Weixin 1.0 for iPhone (beta) Newly Released. https://weixin.qq.com/cgi-bin/readtemplate?lang=zh_CN&t=weixin_faq_ios
[49]
Jacqueline Williams and Xiuzhong Xu. 2017. China Craves Foreign Goods. Students in Australia Supply Them.The New York Times (2017). https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/02/world/australia/china-students-daigou.html
[50]
Langdon Winner. 1986. Do Artifacts Have Politics?In The Whale and The Reactor: A Search for Limites in An Age of High Technology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Chapter 2, 19–39.
[51]
Jill Palzkill Woelfer and David G Hendry. 2012. Homeless Young People on Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2825–2834. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208686
[52]
Jill Palzkill Woelfer, Amy Iverson, David G Hendry, Batya Friedman, and Brian T Gill. 2011. Improving the Safety of Homeless Young People with Mobile Phones: Values, Form and Function. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1707–1716. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979191
[53]
Ziming Wu and Xiaojuan Ma. 2017. Money As a Social Currency to Manage Group Dynamics: Red Packet Gifting in Chinese Online Communities. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2240–2247. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053153
[54]
Xiuzhong Xu. 2016. A Day in the Life of a Daigou. The World of Chinese(2016). http://www.theworldofchinese.com/2016/07/a-day-in-the-life-of-a-daigou/
[55]
Rui Zhou, Zhonghe Wen, Muchao Tang, and Betsy DiSalvo. 2017. Navigating Media Use : Chinese Parents and Their Overseas Adolescent Children on WeChat. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064701

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Social Agriculture: Examining the Affordances of Social Media for Agricultural PracticesProceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/3530190.3534806(476-489)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2022

Index Terms

  1. Marketplace for Choice and Independence: Young Chinese’s Social Commerce Practices on WeChat
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    Chinese CHI '20: Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop of Chinese CHI
    April 2020
    88 pages
    ISBN:9781450388153
    DOI:10.1145/3403676
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. China
    2. WeChat
    3. social commerce
    4. social network
    5. teens
    6. young people

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    Chinese CHI 2020

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 17 of 40 submissions, 43%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Social Agriculture: Examining the Affordances of Social Media for Agricultural PracticesProceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/3530190.3534806(476-489)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media