skip to main content
10.1145/3403782.3403799acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbibeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Buffer Conductivity Optimization for Single Bacteria Detection Based on Electrical Impedance Flow Cytometry

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Electrical impedance flow cytometry (EIFC) based on microfluidic chip has been applied to the analysis of cells and micron particles, but the sensitivity needs further optimization for bacterial detections. In this paper, we propose an optimization of buffer conductivity to improve the sensitivity of EIFC. In this paper, polystyrene microspheres and yeast were suspended in buffers with different conductivity and detected by EIFC chip respectively. After analysing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and coefficient of variation (CV) of the data, the optimum buffer conductivities for detection were obtained for Polystyrene microspheres (~1.6 S/m) and bacteria (~6.4 S/m), respectively. Then using this optimized microfluidic detection system, the Ø1.0 and Ø0.8 μm microspheres, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus albicans were analyzed, respectively. The results proved that the sensitivity of the EIFC chip can be improved by optimizing the buffer conductivity, which promotes a foundation for the detection, differentiation and analysis of submicron particles/bacteria in the future.

References

  1. D. A. Boehm, P. A. Gottlieb and S. Z. Hua (2007). On-chip microfluidic biosensor for bacterial detection and identification. Sensors & Actuators B Chemical, B126(2), 508--514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. V. Velusamy, K. Arshak and O. Korostynska (2010). An overview of foodborne pathogen detection: In the perspective of biosensors[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2010, 28(2), 232--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. C. Bernabini, D. Holmes and H. Morgan (2011). Micro-impedance cytometry for detection and analysis of micron-sized particles and bacteria. Lab on A Chip, 11, 407--412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. G. M. Tahsin and B. Ismail (2018). Capacitive detection of single bacterium from drinking water with a detailed investigation of electrical flow cytometry. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 269, 454--463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. N. Haandbæk, O. With, S. C. Bürgel, F. Heer and A. Hierlemann (2014). Resonance-enhanced microfluidic impedance cytometer for detection of single bacteria. Lab on A Chip, 14(17), 3313--3324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. C. H. Clausen, G. E. Skands, C. V. Bertelsen and W. E. Svendsen (2015). Coplanar Electrode Layout Optimized for Increased Sensitivity for Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy. Micromachines, 6(1), 110--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. H. Clausen, M. Dimaki and C. Bertelsen (2018). Bacteria Detection and Differentiation Using Impedance Flow Cytometry. Sensors, 18(10), 3496--3507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Cottet, A. Kehren, H. v. Lintel, M. Frénéa-Robin and P. Renaud (2019). How to improve the sensitivity of coplanar electrodes and micro channel design in electrical impedance flow cytometry: a study. Microfluidics and nanofluidics, 23(1):94--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. B. Ismail, G. M. Tahsin, S. Murat, K. Talip and E. Caglar Elbuken (2020). Focusing-free impedimetric differentiation of red blood cells and leukemia cells: A system optimization. Sensors & Actuators: B. Chemical, 307, 127531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. X. Xie, Z. Cheng, Y. Xu, R. Liu, Q. Li and J. Cheng (2017). A sheath-less electric impedance micro-flow cytometry device for rapid label-free cell classification and viability testing. Analytical Methods, 9(7):1201--1212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. X. Xie, Z. Zhang, X. Ge, X. Zhao, L. Hao, Z. Cheng, Y. Du, W. Zhou, L. Wang, F. Tian and X. Xu (2019). Particle Self-aligning, Focusing, and Electric Impedance Microcytometer Device for Label-free Single Cell Morphology Discrimination and Yeast Budding Analysis. Analytical Chemistry, 91(21):13398--13406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The Buffer Conductivity Optimization for Single Bacteria Detection Based on Electrical Impedance Flow Cytometry

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      BIBE2020: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Biological Information and Biomedical Engineering
      July 2020
      219 pages
      ISBN:9781450377096
      DOI:10.1145/3403782

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 July 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      BIBE2020 Paper Acceptance Rate36of116submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate36of116submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader