skip to main content
10.1145/3403782.3403812acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbibeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Graphical Representation of Protein Sequences and Its Applications

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Based on the chaos game representation, a three-dimensional graphical representation of protein sequence was proposed to describe protein sequence. Then, a numerical characterization methodwas proposed to compare protein sequences. Finally, the nine ND5 proteins are compared based on the numerical characterization to illustrate the method.

References

  1. E. Hamori, J. Ruskin (1983). H curves, a novel method of representation of nucleotide series especially suited for long DNA sequences.J BiolChem, 258(2), 1318--1327.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M.A. Gates (1986). A simple way to look at DNA. J TheorBiol, 119(3), 319--328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P.M. Leong, S. Morgenthaler (1995). Random walk and gap plots of DNA sequences. J. Comput. Appl. Biosci, 11, 503--511.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Nandy (1996). A new graphical representation and analysis of DNA sequence structure. I: Methodology and application to globin genes. CurrSci, 70,611--668Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. N. Jafarzadeh, A. Iranmanesh (2012). A novel graphical and numerical representation for analyzingDNA sequences based on codons. MATCH, 68, 611--620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H.I. Jeffrey (1990). Chaos game representation of gene structure, Nucleic Acids Res, 18, 2163--2170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. P. Wąż, D. Bielińska-Wąż, A. Nandy (2013). Descriptors of 2D-dynamic graphs as a classificationtool of DNA sequences. J Math Chem, 52(1), 132--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. K. Yamaguchi, S. Mizuta (2014). A new graphical representation of DNA sequences using symmetricalvector assignment. Review of Bioinformatics and Biometrics, 3, 14--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Y. Kobori, S. Mizuta (2016). Similarity estimation between DNA sequences based on local patternhistograms of binary images. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics. 14(2),103--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. X. Jin, Q. Jiang, Y.Y. Chen, S.J. Lee, R. Nie, S.W. Yao, D.M. Zhou, K.J. He (2017). Similarity/dissimilarity calculation methods of DNA sequences: A survey. J MolGraph Model, 76, 342--355.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J.S. Almeida (2014). Sequence analysis by iterated maps, a review. Brief Bioinformitcs, 15(3), 369--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Ren, X. Bai, Y.Y. Lu, K.J. Tang, Y. Wang, G. Reinert, F.Z. Sun (2018). Alignment-free sequence analysis and applications. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci, 1, 93--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. C.T. Zhang, R. Zhang (1991). Analysis of distribution of bases in the coding sequences by a diagrammatic technique, NuclAcids Rev, 19, 6313--6317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Randić, M. Vračko, S.C. Basak (2000). On 3-D graphical representation of DNA primary sequences and their numerical characterization, JChemInfComputSci, 40, 1235--1244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. N. Jafarzadeh, A. Iranmanesh (2013). C-curve: A novel 3D graphical representation of DNAsequence based on codons. Mathematical Biosciences, 241(2):217--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. P.Wąż, D. Bielińska-Wąż (2014). 3D-dynamic representation of DNA sequences. JMol Model, 20(3):2141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. Randic (2004). 2-D graphical representation of proteins based on virtual genetic code, SAR QSAR Environ Res, 15(3), 147--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. Randic (2007). 2-D graphical representation of proteins based on physicochemical properties of amino acids. ChemPhys Lett, 444(1-3), 176--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. P.A. He, X.F. Li, J.L. Yang, J. Wang (2011). A novel descriptor for protein similarity analysis. MATCH Commun Math ComputChem, 65, 445--458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Z.H. Qi, M.Z. Jin, S.L. Li, J. Feng (2015). A protein mapping method based on physicochemical properties and dimension reduction. ComputBiol Med, 57, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. W. Hou, Q. Pan, M. He (2016). A new graphical representation of protein sequences and its applications. Phys A Stat MechAppl, 444(C), 996--1002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Randic, D. Butina, J. Zupan (2006). Novel 2-D graphical representation of proteins, ChemPhysLett, 419, 528--532.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. P.A. He (2010) A new graphical representationof similarity/dissimilaritystudies of protein sequences.SAR QSAR Environ Res, 21(5-6): 571--580.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. P.A. He, D. Li, Y.P. Zhang, X. Wang, Y.H. Yao (2012). A 3D graphical representation of protein sequences based on the Gray code. J TheorBiol, 304(7), 81--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Y. X. Liu, D. Li, K. B. Lu, Y. D. Jiao, P.A. He (2013). P-H Curve, a Graphical Representation of Protein Sequences for Similarities Analysis, MATCH Commun. Math ComputChem, 70 (1): 451--466.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. T.T. Ma, Y.X. Liu, Q. Dai, Y.H. Yao, P.A. He (2014). A graphical representation of protein sequences based on a novel iterated function system. Phys A Stat MechAppl, 403(1), 21--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. P.A. He, S.N. Xu, Q. Dai, Y.H. Yao (2016). A generalization of CGR representation for analyzing and comparing protein sequences. Int J Quantum Chem, 116(6), 476--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Z. H. Qi, K. C. Li, J. L. Ma, Y. H. Yao, L.Y. Liu (2018) Novel Method of 3-Dimensional GraphicalRepresentation for Proteins and Its Application. Evolutionary Bioinformatics, 14, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. J. Lin, J. Wei, D. Adjeroh, B.H. Jiang, Y Jiang (2018) SSAW: A new sequence similarity analysis method based on the stationary discrete wavelet transform. BMC Bioinformatics, 19(1),165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. M. M. Abo-Elkhier, M. A. A. Elwahaab, M. A. E. Maaty (2019) Measuring Similarity among Protein Sequences Using aNew Descriptor. Biomed Res Int, 2796971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. X. F. Cadet, R. Dehak, S. P. Chin, M. Bessafi (2019) Non-Linear Dynamics Analysis of Protein Sequences. Application to CYP450. Entropy, 21, 852.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. J. D. Thompson, D. G. Higgins, T. J. Gibson (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res, 22(2), 4673--4680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Graphical Representation of Protein Sequences and Its Applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      BIBE2020: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Biological Information and Biomedical Engineering
      July 2020
      219 pages
      ISBN:9781450377096
      DOI:10.1145/3403782

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 July 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      BIBE2020 Paper Acceptance Rate36of116submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate36of116submissions,31%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader