skip to main content
10.1145/3404716.3404730acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmsspConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Anomaly Detection of Aerospace Facilities Using Ganomaly

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the field of aerospace, the abnormal detection of data is of great significance. The rapid and effective detection of abnormal parameters is key to find potential failures of spacecraft. Traditional methods of anomaly detection need much manual labour and material resources but cannot satisfy the requirements of real-time accuracy. At the same time, there are far more normal samples than abnormal samples, and the original classification methods cannot be applied. In this paper, we propose a GANomaly-based framework for anomaly detection of aerospace data. GANomaly is a framework that analyzes the underlying relationships of data using potential space, which is more in line with the characteristics of the payload data and the actual scenarios for anomaly detection. This article compares GANomaly with other anomaly detection methods on the public aerospace dataset and payload dataset respectively. The results show that the GANomaly-based anomaly detection framework has good capabilities for detecting abnormality of aerospace datasets.

References

  1. Smolensky P. Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundations of harmony theory. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hinton G E, Zemel R S. Autoencoders, minimum description length and Helmholtz free energy. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Denver, Colorado, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1994. 3--10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bengio Y, Lamblin P, Popovici D, Larochelle H. Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver, BC, Canada: MIT Press, 2007. 153--160Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Schlegl T, Seeböck P, Waldstein S M, et al. Unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks to guide marker discovery[C]//International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Springer, Cham, 2017: 146--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zenati H, Foo C S, Lecouat B, et al. Efficient gan-based anomaly detection[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.06222, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Akcay S, Atapour-Abarghouei A, Breckon T P. Ganomaly: Semi-supervised anomaly detection via adversarial training[C]//Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Cham, 2018: 622--637.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Donahue, J., Krhenbhl, P., and Darrell, T. Adversarial Feature Learning. abs/1605.09782, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.09782.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dumoulin, V., Belghazi, M. I. D., Poole, B., Lamb, A., Arjovsky, M., Mastropietro, O., and Courville, A. Adversarially learned inference. 2017. URL http://arXiv.org/abs/1606.00704.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, "Generative adversarial nets," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, 2014, pp. 2672---2680.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Isola P, Zhu J Y, Zhou T, et al. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2017: 1125--1134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Mattia F, Galeone P, De Simoni M, et al. A survey on gans for anomaly detection[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.11632, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang Z, She Q, Ward T E. Generative adversarial networks: A survey and taxonomy[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.01529, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Silva E, Lochter J. A study on Anomaly Detection GAN-based methods on image data[C]//Anais do XVI Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional. SBC, 2020: 823--831.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kliger M, Fleishman S. Novelty detection with gan[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.10560, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee W, Xiang D. Information-theoretic measures for anomaly detection[C]//Proceedings 2001 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. S&P 2001. IEEE, 2000: 130--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Anomaly Detection of Aerospace Facilities Using Ganomaly

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICMSSP '20: Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Multimedia Systems and Signal Processing
      May 2020
      112 pages
      ISBN:9781450377485
      DOI:10.1145/3404716

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 July 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader