skip to main content
10.1145/3405758.3405786acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbbtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparison of Different Image Processing Methods with Spatial Information in Clinical Brain MRI

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The technology expansion in medical imaging has been become important part of clinical practice particularly in interdisciplinary research field. A computer aided diagnostic processing has crucially contribute to the development of algorithm and computing languages in imaging technology especially in medical field. However various methods and technique has been applied on processing the MRI images without any golden standard procedures or methods. This paper is studied different methods of image processing methods for image filtering, image enhancement and image segmentation by using global spatial techniques on MRI brain images of clinical routine. A common standard method for processing the MRI images has been varied depending on clinical applications and intentions. As more challenges arise, the processing and analyzing MRI images with different modalities are also significant so that high quality information can be produced for disease diagnosis and treatment planning. Therefore, this study is conducted to study the comparison of various methods for processing the clinical MRI images for most important elements in image processing that are filtering, enhancement and segmentation. All the comparisons methods are computationally developed and tested using MATLAB programming and the performance of each methods are evaluated based on qualitative and quantitative measurement. The results present most suitable methods for filtering, enhancing and segmenting the T2-WI MRI images particularly for determine the WMH lesions on brain image.

References

  1. Q. Li and R. M. Nishikawa, Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis in Medical Imaging. CRC Press, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. H. Arimura, T. Magome, Y. Yamashita, and D. Yamamoto, "Computer-aided diagnosis systems for brain diseases in magnetic resonance images," Algorithms, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 925--952, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. U. Rudrapatna et al., "NeuroImage Can diffusion kurtosis imaging improve the sensitivity and specificity of detecting microstructural alterations in brain tissue chronically after experimental stroke? Comparisons with diffusion tensor imaging and histology," Neuroimage, vol. 97, pp. 363--373, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. İ. Güler, A. Demirhan, and R. Karakış, "Interpretation of MR images using self-organizing maps and knowledge-based expert systems," Digit. Signal Process., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 668--677, Jul. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. A. Balafar, A. R. Ramli, M. I. Saripan, and S. Mashohor, "Review of brain MRI image segmentation methods," Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 261--274, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. X. Wei et al., "Quantitative analysis of MRI signal abnormalities of brain white matter with high reproducibility and accuracy.," J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 203--9, Feb. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. H. Uzunova, S. Schultz, H. Handels, and J. Ehrhardt, "Evaluation of Image Processing Methods for Clinical Applications Mimicking Clinical Data Using Conditional GANs," Bild. für die Medizin 2019, vol. 17, no. 19, pp. 15--20, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Uziel, P. Malla, C. V. Hernández, M. F. Rachmadi, and T. Komura, "Evaluation of Enhanced Learning Techniques for Segmenting Ischaemic Stroke Lesions in Brain Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Images Using a Convolutional Neural Network Scheme," Front. Neuroinform., vol. 13, no. May, pp. 1--16, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. X. M. T. Duong et al., "Convolutional Neural Network for Automated FLAIR Lesion Segmentation on Clinical Brain MR Imaging," AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., pp. 1282--1290, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Jin, Z. Xu, A. P. Harrison, and D. J. Mollura, "White matter hyperintensity segmentation from T1 and FLAIR images using fully convolutional neural networks enhanced with residual connections," in Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. V. Manjón et al., "MRI white matter lesion segmentation using an ensemble of neural networks and overcomplete patch-based voting," Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Dadar et al., "Performance comparison of 10 different classification techniques in segmenting white matter hyperintensities in aging," Neuroimage, vol. 157, no. May, pp. 233--249, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. N. Sulaiman, N. A. Non, I. S. Isa, and N. Hamzah, "Segmentation of brain MRI image based on clustering algorithm," in ISIEA 2014 - 2014 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. I. S. Isa, S. N. Sulaiman, M. Mustapha, and N. K. Karim, "Automatic contrast enhancement of brain MR images using Average Intensity Replacement based on Adaptive Histogram Equalization (AIR-AHE)," Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 24--34, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. N. Saidin, H. A. Mat Sakim, U. K. Ngah, and I. L. Shuaib, "Computer aided detection of breast density and mass, and visualization of other breast anatomical regions on mammograms using graph cuts," Comput. Math. Methods Med., vol. 2013, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. E. A. El-Dahshan, H. M. Mohsen, K. Revett, and A.-B. M. Salem, "Computer-aided diagnosis of human brain tumor through MRI: A survey and a new algorithm," Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 5526--5545, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. I. S. I. S. Isa, S. N. S. N. Sulaiman, M. Mustapha, and S. Darus, "Evaluating Denoising Performances of Fundamental Filters for T2-Weighted MRI Images," Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 760--768, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. K. S. Sivasundari, R. Siva Kumar, "Performance Analysis of Image Filtering Algorithms for MRI Images," Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 438--440, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. T. T. T. Hah, J. Y. Kim, and S. H. Choi, "White Matter Hyperintensities Extraction Based T2-FLAIR MRI Using Non-Local Means Filter and Nearest Neighbor Algorithm," in 2014 International Conference on IT Convergence and Security (ICITCS), 2014, pp. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. M. A. Raj, N. Khadeeja, and M. H. Supriya, "Implementation of Histogram Based Image Fusion Technique for Underwater Image Enhancement in Reconfigurable Platform," vol. 10, no. July, pp. 1--7, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. V. Govind, A. A. Balakrishnan, and D. Mathew, "A Novel Approach for Contrast Enhancement and Noise Removal of Medical Images," in 2013 International Conference on Control Communication and Computing (ICCC), 2013, pp. 153--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. I. S. Isa, S. N. Sulaiman, M. F. Abdullah, N. M. Tahir, M. Mustapha, and N. K. A. Karim, "New Image Enhancement Technique for WMH Segmentation of MRI FLAIR Image," in 2016 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE2016), 2016, pp. 30--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. Rani, "MRI brain image enhancement using Histogram equalization Techniques," IEEE WiSPNET 2016 Conf., no. 1, pp. 770--773, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. K and M. M, "CADIST: Comparative Analysis Of Diverse Image Segmentation Techniques," Int. J. Electr. Electron. Eng. Telecommun., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 21--28, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. B. S. Saini and S. Pai, "Local Intensity Information Based Improved Level Set Method for Image Segmentation," Int. J. Electr. Electron. Eng. Telecommun., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 58--67, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. I. S. Isa, S. N. Sulaiman, N. M. Tahir, M. Mustapha, and N. K. A. Karim, "A new technique for k-means cluster centers initialization of WMH segmentation," ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., vol. Part F1313, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. M. Dadar et al., "Validation of a Regression Technique for Segmentation of White Matter Hyperintensities in Alzheimer's Disease," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 99, no. PP, pp. 1--1, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Yoshita, E. Fletcher, and C. DeCarli, "Current concepts of analysis of cerebral white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging.," Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 399--407, Dec. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. K. Im, J. M. Lee, O. Lyttelton, S. H. Kim, A. C. Evans, and S. I. Kim, "Brain size and cortical structure in the adult human brain," Cereb. Cortex, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 2181--2191, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. J. Rani, "MRI brain image enhancement using Histogram equalization Techniques," IEEE WiSPNET 2016 Conf., no. 1, pp. 770--773, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. I. S. Isa, S. N. Sulaiman, M. F. Abdullah, N. M. Tahir, M. Mustapha, and N. K. A. Karim, "New Image Enhancement Technique for WMH Segmentation of MRI FLAIR Image," in 2016 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE2016), 2016, pp. 30--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. C.-M. Chen et al., "Automatic Contrast Enhancement of Brain MR Images Using Hierarchical Correlation Histogram Analysis," J. Med. Biol. Eng., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 724--734, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. F. Alam, S. Ur, S. Ullah, and K. Gulati, "ScienceDirect Medical image registration in image guided surgery: Issues, challenges and research opportunities," Integr. Med. Res., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 71--89, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. L. Dora, S. Agrawal, R. Panda, A. Abraham, and S. Member, "State-of-the-Art Methods for Brain Tissue Segmentation: A Review," IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 10, pp. 235--249, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Comparison of Different Image Processing Methods with Spatial Information in Clinical Brain MRI

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICBBT '20: Proceedings of the 2020 12th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Technology
      May 2020
      163 pages
      ISBN:9781450375719
      DOI:10.1145/3405758

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 July 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader