skip to main content
10.1145/3406324.3424586acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Workshop on Designing Technologies for Future Forms of Sustainable Mobility

Published: 25 February 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Human transportation has a significant impact on carbon dioxide emissions. Recently several industries have focused on producing more sustainable transportation technologies. However, exploiting the emerging benefit of such technologies requires behavioral changes to integrate decisions and behaviors towards sustainable mobility in users’ everyday lives. In this workshop, we invite designers, researchers, and practitioners from the sustainable HCI, persuasive design, AutomotiveUI, and mobility communities to collaborate in finding ways to make future mobility more sustainable. Using embodied design improvisation and design fiction methods, we will explore the ways that systems affects behavior which then affect the environment.

References

[1]
Evangelia Anagnostopoulou, Efthimios Bothos, Babis Magoutas, Johann Schrammel, and Gregoris Mentzas. 2016. Persuasive technologies for sustainable urban mobility. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.05957(2016).
[2]
Evangelia Anagnostopoulou, Babis Magoutas, Efthimios Bothos, Johann Schrammel, Rita Orji, and Gregoris Mentzas. 2017. Exploring the links between persuasion, personality and mobility types in personalized mobility applications. In International conference on persuasive technology. Springer, 107–118.
[3]
Oliver Bates, Vanessa Thomas, Christian Remy, Lisa P. Nathan, Samuel Mann, and Adrian Friday. 2018. The Future of HCI and Sustainability: Championing Environmental and Social Justice. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article SIG01, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3185365
[4]
Eugenie L. Birch. 2014. A Review of “Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability” and “Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change”. Journal of the American Planning Association 80, 2(2014), 184–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.954464 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.954464
[5]
Efthimios Bothos, Gregoris Mentzas, Sebastian Prost, Johann Schrammel, and Kathrin Röderer. 2014. Watch your Emissions: Persuasive Strategies and Choice Architecture for Sustainable Decisions in Urban Mobility.PsychNology Journal 12, 3 (2014).
[6]
IPCC Climate Change 2014. Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA(2014).
[7]
WHO Regional Office for Europe. 2007. Steps to health: a European framework to promote physical activity for health. Copenhagen, Denmark.
[8]
Jon Froehlich, Tawanna Dillahunt, Predrag Klasnja, Jennifer Mankoff, Sunny Consolvo, Beverly Harrison, and James A Landay. 2009. UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1043–1052.
[9]
Cornelius Hardt and Klaus Bogenberger. 2019. Usage of e-Scooters in Urban Environments. Transportation Research Procedia 37 (2019), 155 – 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.178 21st EURO Working Group on Transportation Meeting, EWGT 2018, 17th - 19th September 2018, Braunschweig, Germany.
[10]
Marc Hassenzahl and Matthias Laschke. 2015. Pleasurable troublemakers. The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications (2015), 167–195.
[11]
Haneen Khreis and Mark Nieuwenhuijsen. 2016. Car free cities: Pathway to healthy urban living. Environment International 94 (09 2016), 251 – 262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.032
[12]
Andrew L Kun 2018. Human-machine interaction for vehicles: Review and outlook. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 11, 4(2018), 201–293.
[13]
Tim Kurz, Benjamin Gardner, Bas Verplanken, and Charles Abraham. 2015. Habitual behaviors or patterns of practice? Explaining and changing repetitive climate-relevant actions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 6, 1 (2015), 113–128.
[14]
Dan Lockton, David Harrison, and Neville A Stanton. 2010. The Design with Intent Method: A design tool for influencing user behaviour. Applied ergonomics 41, 3 (2010), 382–392.
[15]
Thorsten Luettel, Michael Himmelsbach, and Hans-Joachim Wuensche. 2012. Autonomous Ground Vehicles-Concepts and a Path to the Future.Proc. IEEE 100, Centennial-Issue (2012), 1831–1839.
[16]
Jennifer C Mankoff, Eli Blevis, Alan Borning, Batya Friedman, Susan R Fussell, Jay Hasbrouck, Allison Woodruff, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. Environmental sustainability and interaction. In CHI’07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 2121–2124.
[17]
Gregory James Offer. 2015. Automated vehicles and electrification of transport. Energy & Environmental Science 8, 1 (2015), 26–30.
[18]
Benjamin Pichler and Andreas Riener. 2015. Evaluation of Historical Electric Vehicle (EV) Driving Data to Suggest Improvements in Driving Efficiency. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809730.2809756
[19]
James O Prochaska, Colleen A Redding, Kerry E Evers, 2015. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice (2015), 125–148.
[20]
A. Riener, K. Zia, A. Ferscha, C. Ruiz Beltran, and J. J. Minguez Rubio. 2013. Traffic flow harmonization in expressway merging. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 3 (01 Mar 2013), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0505-6
[21]
Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Susanne C.J. Boll, Wilko Heuten, Heinrich H. Bülthoff, and Lewis Chuang. 2018. Feel the Movement: Real Motion Influences Responses to Take-over Requests in Highly Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 246, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173820
[22]
Thomas F Stocker, Dahe Qin, Gian-Kasper Plattner, Melinda Tignor, Simon K Allen, Judith Boschung, Alexander Nauels, Yu Xia, Vincent Bex, Pauline M Midgley, 2013. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 1535 (2013).
[23]
Richard H Thaler and Cass R Sunstein. [n.d.]. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness.
[24]
Philipp Wintersberger, Clemens Schartmüller, and Andreas Riener. 2019. Attentive User Interfaces to Improve Multitasking and Take-Over Performance in Automated Driving: The Auto-Net of Things. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI) 11, 3(2019), 40–58.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MobileHCI '20: 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
October 2020
248 pages
ISBN:9781450380522
DOI:10.1145/3406324
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 February 2021

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Mobility
  2. automotive UI
  3. behavior change
  4. bicycles.
  5. climate change
  6. micro-mobility
  7. persuasive technology
  8. sustainable HCI
  9. sustainable transportation

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

MobileHCI '20

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 146
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media