skip to main content
10.1145/3406499.3415076acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Domestic Drones: Context of Use in Research Literature

Published: 10 November 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Domestic robotic entities are on the rise, out of which, domestic drones are taking place in our society as one of the upcoming interactive technologies that we will see in our daily lives. In this paper, we scope for research literature that addresses the use of domestic drones within our environments to understand the current usage as well as identifying future research directions. After performing a search based collection of relevant papers in the ACM digital library (N=61 papers), we analysed the drone's application areas, their interaction modalities, the target users, and the level of autonomy of the proposed systems. The results show interesting trends in the modalities of interaction (visual projection combined with hand/foot gestures) as well as important research gaps such as child-drone interaction, and the use of drones for healthcare or education, given that currently most use cases for domestic drones are generic in nature.

References

[1]
Parastoo Abtahi, Benoit Landry, Jackie (Junrui) Yang, Marco Pavone, Sean Follmer, and James A. Landay. 2019. Beyond The Force: Using Quadcopters to Appropriate Objects and the Environment for Haptics in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300589
[2]
Parastoo Abtahi, David Y. Zhao, Jane L. E., and James A. Landay. 2017. Drone Near Me: Exploring Touch-Based Human-Drone Interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (Sept. 2017), 34:1--34:8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130899
[3]
Maxime Agor, Damien Clergeaud, Antoine Clée, and Martin Hachet. 2017. Human-drones interaction for gravity-free juggling. In Proceedings of the 29th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM '17). Association for Computing Machinery, Poitiers, France, 309--314. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132129.3132163
[4]
Majed Al Zayer, Sam Tregillus, Jiwan Bhandari, Dave Feil-Seifer, and Eelke Folmer. 2016. Exploring the Use of a Drone to Guide Blind Runners. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '16). Association for Computing Machinery, Reno, Nevada, USA, 263--264. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982204
[5]
Muhammad Yeasir Arafat and Sangman Moh. 2019. Routing protocols for unmanned aerial vehicle networks: A survey. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 99694--99720.
[6]
Dante Arroyo, Cesar Lucho, Silvia Julissa Roncal, and Francisco Cuellar. 2014. Daedalus: a sUAV for human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, Bielefeld, Germany, 116--117. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2563709
[7]
Mauro Avila, Markus Funk, and Niels Henze. 2015. Drone Navigator: Using Drones for Navigating Visually Impaired Persons. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '15). Association for Computing Machinery, Lisbon, Portugal, 327--328. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2811362
[8]
Mauro Avila Soto, Markus Funk, Matthias Hoppe, Robin Boldt, Katrin Wolf, and Niels Henze. 2017. Drone Navigator: Using Leashed and Free-Floating Quadcopters to Navigate Visually Impaired Travelers. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 300--304. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132556
[9]
Burchan Aydin. 2019. Public acceptance of drones: Knowledge, attitudes, and practice. Technology in Society 59 (2019), 101180.
[10]
Mehmet Aydin Baytas, Damla Çay, Yuchong Zhang, Mohammad Obaid, Asim Evren Yantaç, and Morten Fjeld. 2019. The design of social drones: A review of studies on autonomous flyers in inhabited environments. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[11]
Mehmet Aydin Baytas, Damla Çay, Yuchong Zhang, Mohammad Obaid, Asim Evren Yantaç, and Morten Fjeld. 2019. The Design of Social Drones: A Review of Studies on Autonomous Flyers in Inhabited Environments. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300480
[12]
Tony Belpaeme, James Kennedy, Aditi Ramachandran, Brian Scassellati, and Fumihide Tanaka. 2018. Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics 3, 21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954 arXiv:https://robotics.sciencemag.org/content/3/21/eaat5954.full.pdf
[13]
Sean Braley, Calvin Rubens, Timothy Merritt, and Roel Vertegaal. 2018. Grid-Drones: A Self-Levitating Physical Voxel Lattice for Interactive 3D Surface Deformations. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Berlin, Germany, 87--98. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242587.3242658
[14]
Anke M. Brock, Julia Chatain, Michelle Park, Tommy Fang, Martin Hachet, James A. Landay, and Jessica R. Cauchard. 2018. FlyMap: Interacting with Maps Projected from a Drone. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Munich, Germany, 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205877
[15]
Guowei Cai, Jorge Dias, and Lakmal Seneviratne. 2014. A survey of smallscale unmanned aerial vehicles: Recent advances and future development trends. Unmanned Systems 2, 02 (2014), 175--199.
[16]
Jessica R Cauchard, Jane L E, Kevin Y Zhai, and James A Landay. 2015. Drone & me: an exploration into natural human-drone interaction. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 361--365.
[17]
Jessica R. Cauchard, Jane L. E, Kevin Y. Zhai, and James A. Landay. 2015. Drone & me: an exploration into natural human-drone interaction. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). Association for Computing Machinery, Osaka, Japan, 361--365. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2805823
[18]
Jessica R. Cauchard, Alex Tamkin, Cheng Yao Wang, Luke Vink, Michelle Park, Tommy Fang, and James A. Landay. 2019. Drone.io: A Gestural and Visual Interface for Human-Drone Interaction. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 153--162. https://doi.org/10.1109/ HRI.2019.8673011 ISSN: 2167--2148.
[19]
Jessica R. Cauchard, Kevin Y. Zhai, Marco Spadafora, and James A. Landay. 2016. Emotion encoding in Human-Drone Interaction. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 263--270. https: //doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451761 ISSN: 2167--2148.
[20]
Victoria Chang, Pramod Chundury, and Marshini Chetty. 2017. Spiders in the Sky: User Perceptions of Drones, Privacy, and Security. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, Denver, Colorado, USA, 6765--6776. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/3025453.3025632
[21]
Chien-Fang Chen, Kang-Ping Liu, and Neng-Hao Yu. 2015. Exploring interaction modalities for a selfie drone. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Posters (SA '15). Association for Computing Machinery, Kobe, Japan, 1--2. https://doi.org/10.1145/2820926. 2820965
[22]
Yu-An Chen, Te-Yen Wu, Tim Chang, Jun You Liu, Yuan-Chang Hsieh, Leon Yulun Hsu, Ming-Wei Hsu, Paul Taele, Neng-Hao Yu, and Mike Y. Chen. 2018. ARPilot: designing and investigating AR shooting interfaces on mobile devices for drone videography. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Barcelona, Spain, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229475
[23]
Ashley Colley, Lasse Virtanen, Pascal Knierim, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2017. Investigating drone motion as pedestrian guidance. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '17). Association for Computing Machinery, Stuttgart, Germany, 143--150. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3152832.3152837
[24]
Kerstin Dautenhahn, Sarah Woods, Christina Kaouri, Michael L Walters, Kheng Lee Koay, and Iain Werry. 2005. What is a robot companion-friend, assistant or butler?. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, 1192--1197.
[25]
Julia Dawe, Craig Sutherland, Alex Barco, and Elizabeth Broadbent. 2019. Can social robots help children in healthcare contexts? A scoping review. BMJ paediatrics open 3, 1 (2019).
[26]
Tinglin Duan, Parinya Punpongsanon, Daisuke Iwai, and Kosuke Sato. 2018. FlyingHand: extending the range of haptic feedback on virtual hand using drone based object recognition. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2018 Technical Briefs (SA '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Tokyo, Japan, 1--4. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3283254.3283258
[27]
Jane L. E, Ilene L. E, James A. Landay, and Jessica R. Cauchard. 2017. Drone & Wo: Cultural Influences on Human-Drone Interaction Techniques. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6794--6799. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025755
[28]
Sara Eriksson, Kristina Höök, Richard Shusterman, Dag Svanes, Carl Unander Scharin, and Åsa Unander-Scharin. 2020. Ethics in Movement: Shaping and Being Shaped in Human-Drone Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3313831.3376678
[29]
Terrence Fong, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and autonomous systems 42, 3--4 (2003), 143--166.
[30]
Jérémie Garcia, Luc Chevrier, Yannick Jestin, and Anke M. Brock. 2019. HandiFly: Towards Interactions to Support Drone Pilots with Disabilities. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19). Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312957
[31]
Antonio Gomes, Calvin Rubens, Sean Braley, and Roel Vertegaal. 2016. BitDrones: Towards Using 3D Nanocopter Displays as Interactive Self-Levitating Programmable Matter. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, California, USA, 770--780. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858519
[32]
Michael A Goodrich and Alan C Schultz. 2008. Human-robot interaction: a survey. Now Publishers Inc.
[33]
Jeonghye Han and Ilhan Bae. 2018. Social Proxemics of Human-Drone Interaction: Flying Altitude and Size. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Chicago, IL, USA, 376. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3177527
[34]
Chie Hieida, Hiroaki Matsuda, Shunsuke Kudoh, and Takashi Suehiro. 2016. Action elements of emotional body expressions for flying robots. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 439--440. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451795 ISSN: 2167--2148.
[35]
Matthias Hoppe, Marinus Burger, Albrecht Schmidt, and Thomas Kosch. 2019. Dron OS: a flexible open-source prototyping framework for interactive drone routines. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '19). Association for Computing Machinery, Pisa, Italy, 1--7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365610.3365642
[36]
Meriel Huggard and Ciarán Mc Goldrick. 2016. Droning On: Reflections on Integrating UAV Technology into a Computer Engineering Design Laboratory. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (Memphis, Tennessee, USA) (SIGCSE '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 504--509. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844650
[37]
Walther Jensen, Simon Hansen, and Hendrik Knoche. 2018. Knowing You, Seeing Me: Investigating User Preferences in Drone-Human Acknowledgement. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173939
[38]
Wafa Johal. 2020. Research Trends in Social Robots for Learning. Current Robotics Reports (June 2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-020-00008-3
[39]
Brennan Jones, Kody Dillman, Richard Tang, Anthony Tang, Ehud Sharlin, Lora Oehlberg, Carman Neustaedter, and Scott Bateman. 2016. Elevating Communication, Collaboration, and Shared Experiences in Mobile Video through Drones. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). Association for Computing Machinery, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 1123--1135. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901847
[40]
Reza Kachouie, Sima Sedighadeli, Rajiv Khosla, and Mei-Tai Chu. 2014. Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Literature Review. International journal of human-computer interaction 30, 5 (2014), 369--393.
[41]
Kari Daniel Karjalainen, Anna Elisabeth Sofia Romell, Photchara Ratsamee, Asim Evren Yantac, Morten Fjeld, and Mohammad Obaid. 2017. Social Drone Companion for the Home Environment: a User-Centric Exploration. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction (HAI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, Bielefeld, Germany, 89--96. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3125739.3125774
[42]
Mohamed Khamis, Anna Kienle, Florian Alt, and Andreas Bulling. 2018. GazeDrone: Mobile Eye-Based Interaction in Public Space Without Augmenting the User. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks, Systems, and Applications (DroNet'18). Association for Computing Machinery, Munich, Germany, 66--71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3213526.3213539
[43]
Md. Nafiz Hasan Khan, Carman Neustaedter, and Alissa. Antle. 2019. Flight Chair: An Interactive Chair for Controlling Emergency Service Drones. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19). Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1--5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313031
[44]
Bomyeong Kim, Hyun Young Kim, and Jinwoo Kim. 2016. Getting home safely with drone. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (UbiComp '16). Association for Computing Machinery, Heidelberg, Germany, 117--120. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2968219.2971426
[45]
Heesoon Kim and James A. Landay. 2018. Aeroquake: Drone Augmented Dance. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Hong Kong, China, 691--701. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196798
[46]
Klen Čopič Pucihar, Mark Lochrie, and Paul Egglestone. 2015. StreetGamez: A Moving Projector Platform for Projected Street Games. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '15). Association for Computing Machinery, London, United Kingdom, 589--594. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2810305
[47]
Pascal Knierim, Thomas Kosch, Alexander Achberger, and Markus Funk. 2018. Flyables: Exploring 3D Interaction Spaces for Levitating Tangibles. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Stockholm, Sweden, 329--336. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173273
[48]
Pascal Knierim, Steffen Maurer, Katrin Wolf, and Markus Funk. 2018. Quadcopter Projected In-Situ Navigation Cues for Improved Location Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174007
[49]
Sarah Kriz, Toni D Ferro, Pallavi Damera, and John R Porter. 2010. Fictional robots as a data source in HRI research: Exploring the link between science fiction and interactional expectations. In Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 458--463.
[50]
Siya Kunde and Brittany Duncan. 2020. Intuitive Autonomy for Real Users of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (sUAV). In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 576--578. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/3371382.3377440
[51]
Joseph La Delfa, Mehmet Aydin Baytas, Rakesh Patibanda, Hazel Ngari, Rohit Ashok Khot, and Florian 'Floyd' Mueller. 2020. Drone Chi: Somaesthetic Human-Drone Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376786
[52]
Joseph La Delfa, Mehmet Aydin Baytas, Olivia Wichtowski, Rohit Ashok Khot, and Florian Floyd Mueller. 2019. Are Drones Meditative?. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19). Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1--4. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313274
[53]
Jangwon Lee, Haodan Tan, David Crandall, and Selma Šabanović. 2018. Forecasting Hand Gestures for Human-Drone Interaction. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 167--168. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3176967
[54]
Chun Fui Liew and Takehisa Yairi. 2020. Companion Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04637 (2020).
[55]
Sara Ljungblad, Jirina Kotrbova, Mattias Jacobsson, Henriette Cramer, and Karol Niechwiadowicz. 2012. Hospital Robot at Work: Something Alien or an Intelligent Colleague?. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CSCW '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 177--186. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145233
[56]
Mikhail Matrosov, Olga Volkova, and Dzmitry Tsetserukou. 2016. LightAir: a novel system for tangible communication with quadcopters using foot gestures and projected image. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Emerging Technologies (SIGGRAPH '16). Association for Computing Machinery, Anaheim, California, 1--2. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2929464.2932429
[57]
Omar Mubin, Max Manalo, Muneeb Ahmad, and Mohammad Obaid. 2017. Scientometric analysis of the HAI conference. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction. 45--51.
[58]
Omar Mubin, Kewal Wadibhasme, Philipp Jordan, and Mohammad Obaid. 2019. Reflecting on the Presence of Science Fiction Robots in Computing Literature. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 8, 1, Article 5 (March 2019), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3303706
[59]
Florian 'Floyd' Mueller and Matthew Muirhead. 2015. Jogging with a Quadcopter. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2023--2032. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702472
[60]
Wai Shan Ng and Ehud Sharlin. 2011. Collocated interaction with flying robots. In 2011 RO-MAN. 143--149. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005280 ISSN: 1944--9437.
[61]
Mohammad Obaid, Gökçe Elif Baykal, Asim Evren Yantaç, and Wolmet Barendregt. 2018. Developing a Prototyping Method for Involving Children in the Design of Classroom Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0450--7
[62]
Mohammad Obaid, Felix Kistler, Gabrielundefined Kasparavićiūtundefined, ¯ Asim Evren Yantaç, and Morten Fjeld. 2016. How would you gesture navigate a drone? a user-centered approach to control a drone. In Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (AcademicMindtrek '16). Association for Computing Machinery, Tampere, Finland, 113--121. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2994310.2994348
[63]
Mohammad Obaid, Omar Mubin, Christina Anne Basedow, A. Ayça Ünlüer, Matz Johansson Bergström, and Morten Fjeld. 2015. A Drone Agent to Support a Clean Environment. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, Daegu, Kyungpook, Republic of Korea, 55--61. https://doi.org/10.1145/2814940.2814947
[64]
Mohammad Obaid, Omar Mubin, Scott Andrew Brown, Asim Evren Yantac, Mai Otsuki, and Hideaki Kuzuoka. 2020. DroEye: Introducing a Social Eye Prototype for Drones. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 378--380. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378313
[65]
Alena Otto, Niels Agatz, James Campbell, Bruce Golden, and Erwin Pesch. 2018. Optimization approaches for civil applications of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or aerial drones: A survey. Networks 72, 4 (2018), 411--458.
[66]
Kevin Pfeil, Seng Lee Koh, and Joseph LaViola. 2013. Exploring 3d gesture metaphors for interaction with unmanned aerial vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. 257--266.
[67]
Mai T Pham, Andrijana Rajić, Judy D Greig, Jan M Sargeant, Andrew Papadopoulos, and Scott A McEwen. 2014. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research synthesis methods 5, 4 (2014), 371--385.
[68]
Andrzej Romanowski, Sven Mayer, Lars Lischke, Krzysztof Grudzieundefined, Tomasz Jaworski, Izabela Perenc, Przemysŀaw Kucharski, Mohammad Obaid, Tomasz Kosizski, and Paweŀ W. Wozniak. 2017. Towards Supporting Remote Cheering during Running Races with Drone Technology. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI EA '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2867--2874. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053218
[69]
Calvin Rubens, Sean Braley, Julie Torpegaard, Nicklas Lind, Roel Vertegaal, and Timothy Merritt. 2020. Flying LEGO Bricks: Observations of Children Constructing and Playing with Programmable Matter. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, Sydney NSW, Australia, 193--205. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374948
[70]
Jürgen Scheible and Markus Funk. 2016. In-Situ-Displaydrone: Facilitating CoLocated Interactive Experiences via a Flying Screen. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Oulu, Finland) (PerDis '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 251--252. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2914920.2940334
[71]
Jürgen Scheible, Achim Hoth, Julian Saal, and Haifeng Su. 2013. Displaydrone: A Flying Robot Based Interactive Display. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Mountain View, California) (PerDis '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 49--54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491568.2491580
[72]
Stefan Schneegass, Florian Alt, Jürgen Scheible, Albrecht Schmidt, and Haifeng Su. 2014. Midair displays: exploring the concept of free-floating public displays. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). Association for Computing Machinery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2035--2040. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581190
[73]
Daniel Szafir, Bilge Mutlu, and Terrence Fong. 2014. Communication of intent in assistive free flyers. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, Bielefeld, Germany, 358--365. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559672
[74]
Daniel Szafir, Bilge Mutlu, and Terry Fong. 2015. Communicating Directionality in Flying Robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, Portland, Oregon, USA, 19--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454. 2696475
[75]
Haodan Tan, Jangwon Lee, and Gege Gao. 2018. Human-Drone Interaction: Drone Delivery & Services for Social Events. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '18 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, Hong Kong, China, 183--187. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3205433
[76]
Katherine M Tsui, James M Dalphond, Daniel J Brooks, Mikhail S Medvedev, Eric McCann, Jordan Allspaw, David Kontak, and Holly A Yanco. 2015. Accessible human-robot interaction for telepresence robots: A case study. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 1, open-issue (2015).
[77]
Michael Walker, Hooman Hedayati, Jennifer Lee, and Daniel Szafir. 2018. Communicating Robot Motion Intent with Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Chicago, IL, USA, 316--324. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171253
[78]
Yuta Watanabe, Yuya Onishi, Kazuaki Tanaka, and Hideyuki Nakanishi. 2019. Trainability Leads to Animacy: A Case of a Toy Drone. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, Kyoto, Japan, 234--235. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349537. 3352776
[79]
Kaito Yamada, Hiroki Usuba, and Homei Miyahita. 2019. Modeling Drone Pointing Movement with Fitts? Law. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19). Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312835
[80]
Wataru Yamada, Hiroyuki Manabe, and Daizo Ikeda. 2019. ZeRONE: Safety Drone with Blade-Free Propulsion. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300595
[81]
Kotaro Yamaguchi, Ginga Kato, Yoshihiro Kuroda, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa, and Haruo Takemura. 2016. A Non-grounded and Encountered-type Haptic Display Using a Drone. In Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (SUI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, Tokyo, Japan, 43--46. https://doi.org/10. 1145/2983310.2985746
[82]
Alexander Yeh, Photchara Ratsamee, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa, Yuki Uranishi, Tomohiro Mashita, Haruo Takemura, Morten Fjeld, and Mohammad Obaid. 2017. Exploring Proxemics for Human-Drone Interaction. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction (HAI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, Bielefeld, Germany, 81--88. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125739.3125773
[83]
Jian Zhang, Zhitao Yu, Xiangyu Wang, Yibo Lyu, Shiwen Mao, Senthilkumar CG Periaswamy, Justin Patton, and Xuyu Wang. 2018. RFHUI: An Intuitive and Easyto-Operate Human-UAV Interaction System for Controlling a UAV in a 3D Space. In Proceedings of the 15th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (MobiQuitous '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 69--76. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3286978.3286983
[84]
Sergej G. Zwaan and Emilia I. Barakova. 2016. Boxing against drones: Drones in sports education. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '16). Association for Computing Machinery, Manchester, United Kingdom, 607--612. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2935991

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Artificial Intelligence Algorithms and Models for Embodied Agents: Enhancing Autonomy in Drones and RobotsBuilding Embodied AI Systems: The Agents, the Architecture Principles, Challenges, and Application Domains10.1007/978-3-031-68256-8_5(103-132)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2025
  • (2024)Signal Strength-Based Alien Drone Detection and Containment in Indoor UAV Swarm SimulationsIECE Transactions on Intelligent Systematics10.62762/TIS.2024.8077141:2(69-78)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2024
  • (2024)GUFO: Three studies in the initial development of an assistive drone for older people living independentlyProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685409(1-16)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Domestic Drones: Context of Use in Research Literature

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HAI '20: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
      November 2020
      304 pages
      ISBN:9781450380546
      DOI:10.1145/3406499
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 10 November 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. domestic drones
      2. drone applications
      3. human-drone interaction
      4. social drones

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      HAI '20
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 121 of 404 submissions, 30%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)63
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2025)Artificial Intelligence Algorithms and Models for Embodied Agents: Enhancing Autonomy in Drones and RobotsBuilding Embodied AI Systems: The Agents, the Architecture Principles, Challenges, and Application Domains10.1007/978-3-031-68256-8_5(103-132)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2025
      • (2024)Signal Strength-Based Alien Drone Detection and Containment in Indoor UAV Swarm SimulationsIECE Transactions on Intelligent Systematics10.62762/TIS.2024.8077141:2(69-78)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2024
      • (2024)GUFO: Three studies in the initial development of an assistive drone for older people living independentlyProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685409(1-16)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Social Drones for Health, Well-Being, Sports and PlayAdjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3677045.3685462(1-4)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Exploring Intended Functions of Indoor Flying Robots Interacting With Humans in ProximityProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642791(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Challenges and Future Directions for Human-Drone Interaction Research: An Expert PerspectiveInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2400756(1-17)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2024
      • (2023)Drone-Driven Running: Exploring the Opportunities for Drones to Support Running Well-being through a Review of Running and Drone Interaction TechnologiesProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3623809.3623831(209-220)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
      • (2023)Exploring Runners' Preferences of Drone Based Feedback to Support their Well-BeingProceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the ACM Greek SIGCHI Chapter10.1145/3609987.3609997(1-10)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
      • (2023)The Effects of Natural Sounds and Proxemic Distances on the Perception of a Noisy Domestic Flying RobotACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/357985912:4(1-32)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2023
      • (2023)Wisp: Drones as Companions for BreathingProceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3569009.3572740(1-16)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media